Skip to content

Comparison of Biocompatibility of Plasmapheresis Procedures With Citrate and Heparin Anticoagulation

Comparison of Biocompatibility of Plasmapheresis Procedures With Citrate and Heparin Anticoagulation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05191290
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-01-13
Start date
2022-01-21
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2023-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apheresis, Anticoagulation

Brief summary

Membrane plasmapheresis is one of the methods for treating immune diseases. Plasmapheresis removes autoantibodies and immune complexes, paraproteins, lipoproteins and reduces the concentration of cytokines. In membrane plasmapheresis, plasma is separated from blood cells by a highly permeable membrane. The filtered plasma is then discarded and replaced with replacement fluid. During the procedure, there is an activation of the coagulation system, because of the extracorporeal blood circulation. The anticoagulation during the procedure is therefore necessary.

Detailed description

Standard heparin or citrate is routinely used as a method of anticoagulation in plasmapheresis. Citrate provides effective anticoagulation that is completely limited to extracorporeal circulation. Patients who are at increased risk for bleeding, anticoagulation with citrate is a more appropriate method than standard heparin, while in other patients both methods are equivalent. Citrate anticoagulation is performed by infusing citrate into the arterial line of the extracorporeal system. Citrate binds to plasma calcium and thus inhibits coagulation in the system. Calcium is added to the venous line of the system (when blood returns to the patient) to maintain a normal plasma ionized calcium concentration. Lowering the ionized calcium in the blood in the extracorporeal circulation inhibits the coagulation and activation of other systems (platelets, leukocytes, complement), which affects the biocompatibility of the artificial material and the whole procedure. Biocompatibility is extremely important, since the contact of blood with artificial material activates both the humoral and cellular systems. As part of the humoral immune system, complement is activated by the production of C3, C4 and C5, factor XIIa, there is also an increase in the production of bradykinin, kallikrein, quinine and plasmin, and some proteins are denatured (gamma globulins, fibrinogen, albumins). When the cellular immune system is activated, lymphocytosis can occur and the is also change in function of phagocytes. All previous studies show that regional anticoagulation with citrate improves biocompatibility in hemodialysis procedures (compared to heparin anticoagulation), but no direct comparison in plasmapheresis has been observed in the literature so far. Therefore, the investigators want to conduct a prospective randomized study comparing several parameters of heparin and citrate anticoagulation biocompatibility during plasmapheresis. The aim of the study is to demonstrate better biocompatibility in citrate anticoagulation compared to heparin.

Interventions

DRUGunfractionated heparin

standard heparin at 2500 IU i.v. bolus and then 2000 IU/h continuously i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

8% sodium citrate at approx. 27 mmol/h i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

Sponsors

University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* older than 18 years * an indication for plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) with albumin solution as a replacement solution

Exclusion criteria

* contraindication for systemic heparinisation * acute bleeding * known active malignancy * severe infection * anticoagulant therapy at therapeutic dose

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in serum myeloperoxidase from baseline to the end of plasmapheresisat the end of plasmapheresis proceduremyeloperoxidase
change in serum platelet factor 4 from baseline to 30 minutes30 minutes after start of plasmapheresisplatelet factor 4
change in serum platelet factor 4 from baseline to the end of plasmapheresisat the end of plasmapheresis procedureplatelet factor 4
change in serum C5a from baseline to 30 minutes30 minutes after start of plasmapheresiscomplement component C5a
change in serum C5a from baseline to the end of plasmapheresisat the end of plasmapheresis procedurecomplement component C5a
change in serum myeloperoxidase from baseline to 30 minutes30 minutes after start of plasmapheresismyeloperoxidase
change in serum thrombin-antithrombin complex from baseline to 30 minutes30 minutes after start of plasmapheresisthrombin-antithrombin complex
change in serum thrombin-antithrombin complex from baseline to the end of plasmapheresisat the end of plasmapheresis procedurethrombin-antithrombin complex

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
comparison of measured platelet factor 4 in patients' serum and filtered plasma30 minutes after start of plasmapheresisA Bland-Altman agreement analysis
comparison of measured thrombin-antithrombin complex in patients' serum and filtered plasma30 minutes after start of plasmapheresisA Bland-Altman agreement analysis
comparison of measured C5a in patients' serum and filtered plasma30 minutes after start of plasmapheresisA Bland-Altman agreement analysis
comparison of measured myeloperoxidase in patients' serum and filtered plasma30 minutes after start of plasmapheresisA Bland-Altman agreement analysis
complications during plasmapheresis (hypocalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, clotting)during plasmapheresiscomplications during plasmapheresis (hypocalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, clotting)

Countries

Slovenia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026