Skip to content

Effects of Kinesio Taping in Addition to Routine Physical Therapy on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome

Effects of Kinesio Taping in Addition to Routine Physical Therapy on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05191043
Enrollment
68
Registered
2022-01-13
Start date
2021-11-24
Completion date
2022-02-05
Last updated
2022-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Pain

Keywords

Upper Cross Syndrome, kinesio taping, Neck disability index, goniometer, pain

Brief summary

Objective of the study is to compare the effects of kinesio taping and routine physical therapy on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with upper cross syndrome.It is a single blinded randomized controlled trial using non probability purposive sampling technique. ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS: There is a significant difference in the effects of routine physical therapy with and without kinesio taping on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with upper cross syndrome. NULL HYPOTHESIS: There is no significant difference in the effects of routine physical therapy with and without kinesio taping on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with upper cross syndrome.

Detailed description

It will be a prospectively registered ,parallel designed, randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation. Subjects will be selected from the outpatient Department of Physical Therapy, The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital,Lahore, Pakistan. Patients who met eligibility criteria will be informed about the aim of study.all the eligible participants who will agree to participate will sign a consent form. After baseline assessment selected participants will be divided into 2 groups by random allocation method.Subjects will be randomized into two groups using computer generated random numbers.The outcome assessor will be unaware of treatment given to both groups.The calculated sample size using Numeric pain rating scale as outcome measure is 28 in each group, but after adding 20% dropout, the sample size will be 28+6=34 in each group, allowing statistical power of 80%and alpha level of 5%.

Interventions

Kinesio taping is a thin, stretchy, elastic cotton strip with an acrylic adhesive that is approximately the same thickness as the epidermis of the skin. When the taping method is followed correctly, the tape effects on the muscle by facilitating a weakened muscle or relaxing an over-used muscle,decreasing pain, fatigue and increasing tissue recovery. Kinesio Taping facilitation technique will be used with fifty percent stretch on rhomboids bilaterally.

OTHERRoutine Physical Therapy

routine physical therapy includes thermotherapy and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), the strengthening exercises of lower and middle trapezius, rhomboids and deep neck flexors. Stretching exercises of upper trapezius, pectoralis major and minor. Mobilization of cervicothoracic junction and postural education. Thermotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will be used for 10 minutes in each session. Each exercise will be performed in 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Treatment session will have a duration of 30-45 minutes.

Sponsors

University of Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

single

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both gender * Participants with an age between 18 to 40 * Participants diagnosed with chronic upper cross syndrome by orthopedic department for physical therapy treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Trauma, Tumor and Fracture of upper limb and shoulder * Congenital deformities of upper limb * History of any systemic disease * History of any neurological disease (epilepsy &seizure, Parkinson's disease) * History of recent surgery of spine or shoulder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric pain rating scale( assessing change in pain at between baseline, at 1st week, 2nd week and at the end of 4th week of treatment)baseline, 1st week ,2nd week and 4th weekThis is 11 points scale ranges from 0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 is the worst pain. The values ranges from 1-3 means mild pain; 4-6 is considered moderate pain; 7-10 is severe pain. the average of three readings is considered as pain value.
Universal Goniometer (to assess change in range of motion at baseline,1st,2nd and 4th week.)baseline, 1st week ,2nd week and 4th weekA universal goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits rotation of an object to a definite position. It is designed like a protractor and may form a full or a half-circle from 0 to 180 degrees or 180 to 0 degrees for half circle models or 0 to 360 degrees on full circle.Normal range of motion of flexion 0-45 ₒ extension, 0-45 ₒ, side flexion 0-45 ₒ , rotation 0-80.
Neck disability Index ( assessing change in neck functional activities at baseline, 1st,2nd and 4th week)baseline, 1st,2nd and 4th weekThis is the Patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items for measuring disability in patients with neck pain.It contains 10 pain-related questions scored from 0 (no pain) to 5 (most severe pain).

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026