Skip to content

Randomized Feasibility Trial for Mesh in Pre-Pectoral Reconstruction

Randomized Feasibility Trial for Mesh in Pre-Pectoral Reconstruction

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05190978
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-01-13
Start date
2022-10-20
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Breast Implant; Complications, Infection or Inflammation

Keywords

breast cancer, breast reconstruction, breast implant

Brief summary

Surgical mesh products, particularly acellular dermal matrices (ADM), are now used by the majority of plastic surgeons to assist with the nearly 100,000 prosthetic breast reconstruction procedures in the United States, despite never being approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. As surgeons transition to placing breast implants above the chest muscle (pre-pectoral), there has been an increasing reliance on these often expensive mesh products without robust evidence to understand their risks and benefits. Our pilot study is a randomized multi-center trial to evaluate surgical mesh assistance in pre-pectoral tissue expander to breast implant reconstruction to address vital questions for women's public health.

Detailed description

One in eight women will develop breast cancer in her lifetime, causing both physical and psychological trauma due to invasive treatments and the distress associated with removal of a breast. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy has become a critical procedure for many women to restore psychological wellbeing, with implant-based reconstruction the most common approach. Nearly 100,000 patients undergo reconstruction with implants every year in the United States. Surgical mesh devices, particularly acellular dermal matrices, are now used off-label by most reconstructive surgeons performing prosthetic breast reconstruction. In the past decade, surgeons have advocated a transition from submuscular reconstruction (placement of the implant under the pectoralis muscle) to pre-pectoral (placement above the pectoralis) and often consider mesh to be necessary for this procedure. Surgical mesh has not been approved by the FDA for breast reconstruction for either anatomic location. These mesh devices are considered Class III medical devices and FDA recently prioritized the evaluation of these products during a panel meeting in 2019. No Level I randomized trial has been successfully performed to determine the actual risks and benefits of mesh devices in breast reconstruction. This study proposes a pilot study as the first ever randomized, multi-center trial for mesh assistance in two-stage prosthetic pre-pectoral breast reconstruction, across the major manufacturers. The goals are to demonstrate feasibility of such a study and to generate high level data toward the evaluation of safety and effectiveness of these products for the benefit of women's public health

Interventions

Acellular dermal matrix will surgically implanted around the tissue expanders in patients in the ADM cohort.

PROCEDUREReconstruction without ADM

Acellular dermal matrix will not be surgically implanted around the tissue expanders in patients in the control cohort.

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Davis
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients will blinded to whether they receive ADM products during their reconstruction.

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
22 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients age 22 to 75 undergoing unilateral or bilateral immediate pre-pectoral reconstruction with tissue expanders * Prophylactic and oncologic mastectomies are both acceptable * Nipple sparing and skin sparing mastectomy techniques are both acceptable

Exclusion criteria

* Intraoperative assessment demonstrates unfavorable conditions (ie poor mastectomy skin flap thickness or viability) for immediate pre-pectoral reconstruction in any breast * Bilateral reconstruction patients undergoing contralateral submuscular reconstruction * Direct-to-implant reconstruction * Pregnancy * Delayed reconstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety - Major Complications2 yearsRelative rate of major complications (requiring unplanned re-admission or re-operation)
Effectiveness - BREASTQ2 yearsBREAST-Q validated patient reported questionnaire to assess results of final reconstruction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Effectiveness2 yearsTime from expander placement to implant exchange
Secondary Safety2 yearsIndividual complication rates
Capsular Contracture2 yearsRate of capsular contracture

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMichael Delong, MD
mdelong@mednet.ucla.edu(310) 825-5510
CONTACTJaco Festekjian, MD
(310) 825-5510
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Delong, MD

University of California, Los Angeles

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026