Skip to content

Comparison of Techniques Between Concave Distraction and Convex Resection in the Treatment of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis

Comparison of Techniques Between Concave Distraction and Convex Resection in the Treatment of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05190393
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-01-13
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2021-12-01
Last updated
2022-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Scoliosis, Congenital Scoliosis Due to Bony Malformation

Keywords

Congenital cervical scoliosis, hemivertebra resection, distraction and lateral opening, spinal fusion

Brief summary

To treat congenital cervical scoliosis, previous literature introduced surgical technique, like hemivertebra resection by anterior and posterior approach. Although this technique is effective, it has a lot of disadvantages. So investigators introduce another surgical technique.

Detailed description

Although hemivertebra resection technique can obtain satisfactory clinical outcome, it has its disadvantages. Because of the presence of vertebral arteries, the procedure of cervical hemivertebra resection is not only difficult and risky, but also time and labor consuming. The operation is a great challenge to the skill, physical strength and energy of the surgical team. Meanwhile, hemivertebra resection and compression on convex side may lead to iatrogenic foraminal stenosis and increase the incidence of nerve root palsy at the corresponding segment after surgery. The shortening of the convex side may further aggravate the patient's existing short neck deformity, which is not conducive to the recovery of patient's appearance. Therefore, our department pioneer a new surgical technique to avoid hemivertebra resection in 2015, which is distraction and lateral opening on concave side. This technique extends the concave side through intervertebral space where the concave apex locates or adjacent intervertebral space to achieve the purpose of scoliosis correction. The avoidance of hemivertebra resection significantly reduces the difficulty and risk of the surgery. This procedure tries to make up for the patient's congenital anatomical deficiency and lengthen the concave side. Although there is no need to expose vertebral artery, preoperative CTA(computed tomography angiography) should be performed routinely to determine whether there is abnormality in vertebral artery and whether it will interfere with the distraction on concave side and the placement of prosthesis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREhemivertebra resection on convex side

Patients were used hemivertebra resection procedure to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.

PROCEDUREconcave distraction group

Patients were used distraction and lateral opening procedure to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.

Sponsors

Peking University Third Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* the presence of torticollis caused by congenital cervical scoliosis (defined as a Cobb angle of \>10°) * operation and follow-up were performed in our hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with other causes of torticollis appearance, such as muscular torticollis, ocular torticollis, neurogenic torticollis, etc. * Patients with other spinal deformity or disease, such as cervical kyphosis or kyphoscoliosis, congenital deformity of middle and lower thoracic vertebra, lumbar vertebra, ankylosing spondylitis, severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament, etc. * Cervical infectious diseases, cervical primary or metastatic tumor * Have a history of spinal trauma or surgery * Imaging data are incomplete or of poor quality.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the structural Cobb angleone week pre operationthe large curve in the segments with vertebral deformities causing clinical asymmetry or head deviation and needs to be surgically corrected
distal compensatory Cobb angleone week pre operationthe small curve without vertebral deformities
mandibular inclineone week pre operationthe angle between the horizontal line and the line through the mandibular angles on both sides
clavicle angleone week pre operationthe angle between the horizontal line and the line through the clavicular distal end on both sides

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
surgical time durationduring operationsurgical time duration during operation
complicationsperoperative periodcomplications during and after operation
blood lossduring operationblood loss during operation

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026