Skip to content

Clinical Study on the Application of a Specimen Retrieving Bag to Reduce the Polyp Fragmentation Rate

Clinical Study on the Application of a Specimen Retrieving Bag in Endoscopic Polypectomy to Reduce the Polyp Fragmentation Rate

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05189912
Enrollment
204
Registered
2022-01-13
Start date
2022-01-17
Completion date
2022-08-14
Last updated
2024-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyp

Keywords

Colonic Polyp, Specimen retrieval bag, Polyp fragmentation

Brief summary

It is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a larger diameter (\>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive polyps by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. But it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received by this method, many polyps were fragmented. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal. By removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port, the polyp fragmentation rate was reduced greatly. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and colon insertions, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.

Detailed description

After polyp resection, it is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a small diameter (≤5mm), usually by pressing the suction valve button of the colonoscope, polyps could be completely retrieved through a trap. For polyps with a larger diameter (\>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive resected polyps with larger diameters by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. However, it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received, many polyps were fragmented, and the polyp fragmentation rate can be as high as 36.6%\ 60.3%. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal. Due to the possibility of malignant transformation in some polyps, the completeness of polyp resection is essential to guide the following treatment. Some effective methods were developed to reduce polyp fragmentation, including removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port. The resulting polyp fragmentation rates are 22.4-43.0% and 18.5%, respectively. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and improving the efficiency of the operation, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. In a previous pilot study, the polyp receiving bag has been applied in clinical practice, and its polyp fragmentation rate and polyp recovery failure rate are quite low. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the Polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.

Interventions

DEVICESpecimen retrieving bag

Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.

BEHAVIORALSucking polyps to the instrument channel port

Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.

Sponsors

Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients were not informed about their randomization allocation in order to increase reliability during follow-up.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Single polyp, with a diameter of 5-15mm, 2. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Polyps that were not removed en bloc, 2. Underlying bleeding disorder, 3. The platelet count less than 50×10\^9/L, 4. Serious cardio-pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease, 5. Intolerance to endoscopy, 6. Other high-risk conditions or disease (such as massive ascites, etc.), 7. Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Polyp fragmentation rate1 dayThe proportion of fragmented polyps to all polyps.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retrieving failure rate1 dayThe proportion of polyps that failed to be retrieved to all polyps removed.
The duration time of polyp resection1dayThe duration time of polyp resection to the colonoscopy withdraw from body.
The insertion times of colonoscopy1 dayThe insertion times of colonoscopy during the operation.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026