Skip to content

Ventilatory Responses to Hypercapnic and Hypoxic Conditions in Hyperventilants

Ventilatory Responses to Hypercapnic and Hypoxic Conditions in Hyperventilants

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05189158
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-01-12
Start date
2021-10-15
Completion date
2021-10-15
Last updated
2022-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercapnia, Hyperventilation Syndrome, Hypoxia

Brief summary

For almost a century, many hypotheses have converged on the idea of altered chemosensitivity in patients suffering from hyperventilation syndrome (HVS). Given the evolution of current technical equipment and the ability to maximise true positives in HVS ( using the revised hyperventilation provocation test), it seems reasonable to investigate central and peripheral chemosensitivities in HVS subjects.

Detailed description

In the inter-war period, many medical investigators who studied the hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) had already questioned the chemosensitivity to CO2 in HVS patients, without being able to explore it for all intents and purposes. It was subsequently observed that although HVS is not systematically linked to manifest resting hypocapnia, it is nevertheless systematically correlated with significant variability and complexity of ventilation. This is consistent with the observations of an increased plant gain in HVS, to be related to an increased loop gain (due to instability of controller gain feedback). On the other hand, some authors already noted that, when capnia is chronically compromised in HVS, it can be greatly altered by small, transient and barely perceptible increases in VE: a 10% increase in VE could indeed halve PetCO2, while a sigh would be able to decrease PetCO2 by up to 15mmHg. More recently, teh assumption was made that peripheral chemosensitivity may be impaired in HVS patients. For all these considerations, it seems reasonable to investigate central and peripheral chemosensitivities in identified HVS subjects on the basis of an objective test, such as the induced hyperventilation test.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHypercapnic hyperoxic ventilatory response

The hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR) described by Read in 1967 (Read's rebreathing method) is a clinical way to assess the central and peripheric sensitivity to CO2, using a small bag (4-6 l) to achieve prompt equilibrium between the apparatus compartments and the lungs. By rebreathing a hyperoxic mixture with an initial composition of 70% O2, 7% CO2 and 23% N2, this equilibrium is assumed to be achieved after 15 seconds of rebreathing, when the relationship between VE and PetCO2 has become linear.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHypoxic eucapnic ventilatory response

The hypoxic eucapnic ventilatory response (HOVR) is a clinical way to assess the peripheric chemosensitivity to O2, using a small bag (4-6 l) to rebreathe a gas mixture initially composed of 20% O2, 0% CO2 and Δ% N2. Eucapnia is achieved by the activation of a CO2 reabsorption cell during the course of the test.

Sponsors

Université Libre de Bruxelles
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* A plethysmography within subject's predicted values * A negative metacholine test (no documented allergy) * A hyperventilation provocation test result that is consistent with the Nijmegen questionnaire score, confirming either group classification (HVS+ or HVS-)

Exclusion criteria

* Each of the following known or documented conditions: chronic bronchitis (COPD), emphysema, asthma, cardiac disorder, neurological disorder, gastrointestinal disorder, thyroid disorder or psychological/psychiatric disorder * Suspicious cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with cardiac or respiratory limitation * Pregnant women or women in the process of becoming pregnant * Persons with a diving practice (amateur or professional), * High-level athletes, * Active smokers and * persons using morphine, and/or barbiturates, and/or anxiolytics and/or sleeping pills

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The slope of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia (HCVR)baseline - during the testVentilation increase (litres/min) per unit increase in PetCO2 (mmHg) using Read's method
The slope of the ventilatory response to hypoxia (HOVR)baseline - during the testVentilation increase (litres/min) per unit decrease in SpO2 (%) using Read's method
Ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT) of the HCVRbaseline - during the testFrom the average baseline ventilation and PetCO2, the VRT id the PetCO2 level at which the ventilatory response is activated
Ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT) of the HOVRbaseline - during the testFrom the average baseline ventilation and SpO2, the VRT is the level of SpO2 at which the ventilatory response is activated

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extrapolated apnoeic threshold of the HCVRbaseline - during the testPetCO2 level above which apnoea (zero ventilation) is disrupted, obtained from the extrapolation of the HCVR at the X-axis intersection (when VE=0 l/min)
Dyspneabaseline, end of the testVisual analogic scale (VAS) of dyspnea, from 0 (no dyspnea) to 10 (maximal dyspnea)

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026