Skip to content

Validity and Reliability of the Dual-task Questionnaire

Validity and Reliability of the Dual-task Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05188937
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-01-12
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2022-05-05
Last updated
2022-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Dual-Task, Validity, Reliability

Brief summary

It is important to increase the independence of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients in activities of daily living. Almost all activities of daily living require managing many activities at the same time. For example, walking or standing while talking on the phone. There is a need for easily applicable, reliable and valid scales to evaluate dual-task performance in MS patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to establish the Turkish cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Dual-Task Questionnaire scale in MS patients. This study included a total of 50 patients with MS \[age (18-65) years\]. Dual-task Questionnaire (DTQ), Timed Up and Go test (TUG) with dual-task and Nine Hole Peg test (9-HPT) with dual-task were applied to the patients. The second evaluation (retest) was carried out by the same physiotherapist one week following the first evaluation (test) in order to measure test-retest reliability.

Detailed description

This study included patients with MS between 0-5,5 score according to the Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS). DTQ was used to assess the frequency of difficulties associated with daily tasks involving the dual-task. Additionally TUG with dual-task and 9-HPT with dual-task were applied to the patients. An experienced physiotherapist applied all these tests. In order to measure test-retest reliability, a retest was carried out by the same physiotherapist one week following the first evaluation. The construct validity of DTQ was tested by Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Interventions

Validity and reliability assessment of the Dual-task Questionnaire

Sponsors

Gazi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cross-Sectional

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis * Must be able to ambulatory status (Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤ 6 ) * No relapse in the last 3 mounts

Exclusion criteria

* Orthopedic problems * Visual, perception, and hearing problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Validity and reliability of Dual-Task Questionnaire in patients with MSone weekValidity and reliability

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026