Skip to content

Efficacy of Collagen Sponge Versus Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation of Periodontally Compromised Teeth

Efficacy of Collagen Sponge Versus Collagen Membrane in Combination With Collagenated Bovine Bone Mineral on Ridge Preservation of Compromised Extraction Sockets in Periodontitis Patients: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05188196
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-01-12
Start date
2022-04-30
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2024-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis

Brief summary

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ridge preservation with collagen sponge or collagen membrane in combination with collagenated bovine bone mineral in extraction sockets of periodontally diseased teeth.

Detailed description

The study aims to evaluate the changes of clinical and radiographic outcomes following ridge preservation with collagen sponge or collagen membrane in combination with collagenated bovine bone mineral in extraction sockets of periodontally diseased teeth. The included patients will be randomized into two groups. The patients in control group will be treated with collagen membrane + collagenated bovine bone mineral, and those in the test group will be treated with collagen sponge + collagenated bovine bone mineral. The horizontal width of ridge, the vertical height of ridge at the buccal and palatal/lingual plates, width of keratinized tissue and thickness of mucosa will be measured before surgery and at 6 months postoperatively.

Interventions

PROCEDUREalveolar ridge preservation

Alveolar ridge preservation and augmentation commonly are performed immediately after tooth extraction to preserve or increase ridge volume within or beyond the skeletal envelope that exists at the time of extraction.

Sponsors

The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. Need for molar extraction due to periodontal disease and plan for late implantation 3. No acute infection, such as abscess or effusion 4. Presence of bone defects on at one or two socket walls, where the height of the horizontal (suprabony) component of the defect (alveolar bone crest - cement-enamel junction) is \>50% of the corresponding root length and the bone height of socket walls is at least 3 mm 5. Presence of one adjacent tooth to the extraction site

Exclusion criteria

1. Smoking 2. Pregnancy or lactation 3. Untreated periodontal disease 4. Severe systemic conditions that contraindicate surgery (such as diabetes, heart disease, cancer etc.) 5. Under radiotherapy 6. Systemic disease or medication that influences bone metabolism and mucosal healing (such as immunosuppressants, phenytoin, bisphosphonates etc.) 7. Extraction of multiple adjacent teeth 8. Allergy to any of the materials used in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change from baseline horizontal width of ridge at 6 monthsbaseline, at 6 monthshorizontal width of ridge at 1, 3, 5mm below crest
change from baseline vertical height of ridge at 6 monthsbaseline, at 6 monthsvertical height of ridge at the buccal and palatal/lingual plates

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
width of keratinized tissueat 6 monthsmeasured from the MGJ to the mucosa margin at the mid-buccal aspect using a periodontal probe
thickness of mucosaat 6 monthsmeasured at the mid-buccal aspect using an endodontic file with a rubber stop
postoperative painat 2 weeksusing a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWeida Li, master
kyb@zjkq.com.cn0571-87219287

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026