Phantom Limb Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
The investigators have designed a pragmatic trial of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for phantom limb pain (PLP), the PLP-EVEREST trial (PLP-EffectiVEness pRagmatic Stimulation Trial) to test a portable device that would reach underrepresented populations and would validate this therapy in a more pragmatic setting. Subjects will be randomized to home-based tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) with somatosensory training or usual care only (including their current pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, and occupational therapy). The investigators will therefore test the effectiveness of home-based tDCS and somatosensory training in a real-world, home-based setting. The Investigator will compare patients randomized to this combined strategy vs. usual care alone (subjects from this group will be offered combined treatment at the end of the trial). The investigators hypothesize that the combined strategy will be associated with a significantly larger Cohen's d effect size (at least 1) compared to the control group.
Detailed description
The investigators have designed a pragmatic trial of home-based tDCS for PLP, the PLP-EVEREST trial (PLP-EffectiVEness pRagmatic Stimulation Trial) to test a portable device that would reach underrepresented populations and would validate this therapy in a more pragmatic setting. Subjects will be randomized to home-based tDCS of the M1 with somatosensory training or usual care only (including their current pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, and occupational therapy). The investigators will therefore test the effectiveness of home-based tDCS and somatosensory training in a real-world, home-based setting. The investigator will compare patients randomized to this combined strategy vs. usual care alone (subjects from this group will be offered combined treatment at the end of the trial). The investigators hypothesize that the combined strategy will be associated with a significantly larger Cohen's d effect size (at least 1) compared to the control group. The investigators will perform a pragmatic, parallel randomized clinical trial. Investigators will recruit 290 participants with upper and/or lower bilateral or unilateral limb amputation and phantom limb pain in the chronic phase. All participants will be randomized to receive 20 daily sessions (4 weeks) of active anodal M1 home-based tDCS combined with somatosensory training or usual care. The participants will participate in 23 visits over 12 weeks.
Interventions
DEVICEM1 anodal home-based tDCS
During tDCS, low amplitude direct currents are applied via scalp electrodes and penetrate the skull to enter the brain. Direct current will be transferred by a saline-soaked pair of surface sponge electrodes (35 cm2) and delivered by a specially developed, battery-driven, constant current stimulator with a maximum output of 10 mA.
BEHAVIORALSomatosensory Training
The somatosensory training will be performed during the self-administration of tDCS, including 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Sessions will start with relaxation exercises using a body scan technique, whereby subjects in a relaxed state will be instructed to sequentially interchange their mind to different regions of the body while perceiving it and establishing contact with the body part. Subjects will be asked to concentrate on any feeling (kinetic, kinesthetic or exteroceptive) related to each body part. Phantom exercises will involve the use of imagined movements of the phantom limb. Therefore, patients will be asked to perform general exercises with their phantom limb. Exercises will include hip, knee, ankle, and toe movements.
OTHERUsual Care
Usual care includes pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, occupational therapy and/or behavioral therapy that the subject is receiving.
Sponsors
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age - older than 18 years 2. Limb amputation 3. Patients who experience PLP regularly (at least once a week) 4. Pain not attributable to other causes, such as peripheral inflammation 5. Current chronic pain as defined by an average pain of at least 4 on the numeric rating scale (NRS, 0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)
Exclusion criteria
1. Any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder 2. History of substance abuse in the past 6 months (according to the DSM-V criteria for substance use disorder with six or more symptoms) 3. Uncompensated psychiatric disorder 4. Previous significant neurological history with current significant neurological deficits 5. Previous neurosurgical procedure with craniectomy that would affect current distribution of tDCS 6. Contraindications to tDCS (implanted brain medical devices)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Phantom Limb Pain | From Baseline to Visit 22 (at 4 weeks) | The VAS is a common assessment that asks subjects to self-reportedly measure their pain on a visual scale (i.e., unbearable to none). Investigators will use the VAS to determine subjects' pain scores. Subjects will rate their pain from 0 - indicating no pain at all, to 10 - indicating the worst pain felt. This scale is also colored, from green (at 0) to red (at 10), as a visual indicator of pain. This assessment tool is frequently used in many research studies evaluating pain levels in phantom limb. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactFelipe Fregni, MD, PhD, MPH, MMSc
Backup ContactKevin Pacheco-Barrios, MS, MSc, MPH
Outcome results
None listed