Skip to content

Real-world Dapagliflozin Experience in Patients With Heart Failure in United Kingdom.

Early Treatment of Heart Failure: a Non-interventional Observational Study Program of Patients With Heart Failure and Initiated on Dapagliflozin (EVOLUTION-HF - UK)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05188144
Acronym
EVOLUTION-HF
Enrollment
237
Registered
2022-01-12
Start date
2021-11-29
Completion date
2024-03-02
Last updated
2025-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

Heart failure (HF) is a global, public health issue that affects more than 63 million people worldwide; this burden is expected to increase substantially as the population ages. Despite advancements in treatment, a HF diagnosis still leads to significant morbidity and mortality; there is also an immense impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). On May 5, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the approval of dapagliflozin for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), regardless of whether the patient has diabetes. Subsequently, there have been additional approvals for this indication by regulatory authorities across the globe. Real-world observational data are necessary to describe dapagliflozin use in real-world settings with detailed clinical data on heart failure symptoms, outcomes, and HRQoL

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years as of study index date; the study index date is date of initiation of treatment with dapagliflozin * Patient received/receiving treatment with dapagliflozin for HFrEF (EF ≤40%) in accordance with the local dapagliflozin product label * Signed and dated informed consent prior to enrolment in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is enrolled less than 14 days or more than 60 days following initiation of dapagliflozin * Prior treatment with dapagliflozin or other SGLT2i treatment * Initiation of dapagliflozin outside of local HF label * Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes prior to enrolment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of glucose lowering medication discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants who discontinue treatment with glucose lowering medication other than dapagliflozin.
Number of glucose lowering medication dosage changesBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants with dosage changes for glucose lowering medication other than dapagliflozin.
Percentage of glucose lowering medication dosage changesBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants with dosage changes for glucose lowering medication other than dapagliflozin.
Number of glucose lowering medication discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants who discontinue treatment with glucose lowering medication other than dapagliflozin.
Time to dapagliflozin treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsTime from dapagliflozin treatment initiation until the time at which participants stop taking the medication for any reason.
Number of reasons for dapagliflozin treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsNumber of reason for dapagliflozin treatment discontinuation as noted by a health care professional will extracted and described as the number and proportion of participants who have discontinued dapagliflozin according to each reasons presented.
Proportion of reasons for dapagliflozin treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsProportion of reasons for dapagliflozin treatment discontinuation as noted by a health care professional will extracted and described as the number and proportion of participants who have discontinued dapagliflozin according to each reasons presented.
Number of dapagliflozin treatment changesBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants who switch to another HF medication other than dapagliflozin.
Percentage of dapagliflozin treatment changesBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants who switch to another HF medication other than dapagliflozin.
Number of dapagliflozin treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants who discontinued treatment with dapagliflozin.
Percentage of dapagliflozin treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with dapagliflozin.
Time to other heart failure treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsTime from initiation of heart failure medication other than dapagliflozin until the time at which participants discontinued treatment with that medication.
Number of other heart failure treatment initiationBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants who initiate new heart failure medication other than dapagliflozin.
Percentage of other heart failure treatment initiationBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants who initiate new heart failure medication other than dapagliflozin.
Number of other heart failure treatment dosage changesBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants with dosage changes for heart failure medication other than dapagliflozin.
Percentage of other heart failure treatment dosage changesBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants with dosage changes for heart failure medication other than dapagliflozin.
Number of other heart failure treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants who discontinue treatment with heart failure medication other than dapagliflozin.
Percentage of other heart failure treatment discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants who discontinue treatment with heart failure medication other than dapagliflozin.
Time to glucose lowering medication discontinuationBaseline to 12 monthsTime from initiation of glucose lowering medication other than dapagliflozin until the time at which participants discontinued treatment with that medication.
Number of glucose lowering medication initiationBaseline to 12 monthsThe number of participants who initiate new glucose lowering medication other than dapagliflozin.
Percentage of glucose lowering medication initiationBaseline to 12 monthsThe percentage of participants who initiate new glucose lowering medication other than dapagliflozin.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute change from baseline in Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS)-5 questionnaireMeasured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsThe MARS-5 is five-item self-report adherence scale which assesses both intentional and non-intentional non-adherence. Respondents rate the frequency with which the five different medication-taking behaviours occur, scoring each item on a 1-5-point scale with higher scores indicating higher reported adherence. The MARS-5 has been shown to be reliable and valid across a variety of health conditions, including cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases.
Absolute change from baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) scoreMeasured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsThe WPAI is a validated instrument to measure impairments in paid and unpaid work and activities. It measures absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness) as well as the impairments in unpaid activity because of health problems during the past seven days. It has been validated to quantify work impairments for numerous diseases such as asthma, psoriasis, irritable bowel syndrome, and Crohn's disease, but has not yet been validated for use in heart failure participants. Scores will be derived from the overall work impairment at each timepoint and then changes of from baseline will be reported.
Absolute change from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scoreMeasured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsThe KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. Summary scores will be examined at each assessment point during follow-up. For each of the assessment periods, descriptive statistics for the observed value, change from baseline and the 95% two-sided confidence interval for the mean change will be presented. The proportions of participants with overall health status classified as poor, fair, good, and excellent will be examined at each assessment point. Additionally, the proportions of participants who experience clinically meaningful changes in overall health status: improvement (≥5 point increase), deterioration (≥5 point decrease), and stable (\<5 point increase or decrease) will be examined at each assessment point.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026