IUD
Conditions
Keywords
Cervical stabilization
Brief summary
This study aims to determine whether an Allis clamp is an effective clamp for cervical stabilization compared to a single-tooth tenaculum.
Interventions
Physicians utilized a single-tooth tenaculum clam for cervical stabilization during IUD placement.
Physicians utilized an Allis clam for cervical stabilization during IUD placement.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Physician participants were aware of assignment to utilize the single-toothed tenaculum clamp or allis clamp directly prior to IUD placement procedure. Participants were blinded to the clamp assigned.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Obtaining IUD
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients who experienced bleeding after IUD placement | At the time of IUD insertion | Number of patients who experienced bleeding after IUD placement with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IUD insertion success rate | At the time of IUD insertion | The percentage of participants who successfully had an IUD placed with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum. |
| Number of interventions required for cervical clamp site bleeding hemostasis | At the time of IUD insertion | Number of interventions required to achieve hemostasis after IUD placement with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum. |
| Time to hemostasis | At the time of IUD insertion | The time in seconds required to achieve hemostasis after IUD placement with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum. |
| Participant reported pain | At the time of IUD insertion | Pain reported by the participant (0-10 where a higher number indicates greater pain) at the time of IUD placement with n Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum. |
Countries
United States