Skip to content

Contrast Enhanced 3D Echocardiographic Quantification of Right Ventricular Volumes in Repaired CHD

Contrast Enhanced Three Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Right Ventricular Volumes in Repaired Congenital Heart Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05186415
Enrollment
25
Registered
2022-01-11
Start date
2022-08-23
Completion date
2024-06-25
Last updated
2025-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tetralogy of Fallot, Pulmonary Insufficiency

Keywords

ultrasound enhancing agent, echocardiography, lumason

Brief summary

We propose the novel integration of two echocardiographic technologies - three-dimensional echocardiography using semi-automated right ventricular analysis coupled with the administration of ultrasound enhancing agents - to improve the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of various measures of right ventricular size and function, compared with cardiac MRI.

Detailed description

Patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency represent a challenging group of patients with congenital heart disease as they develop progressive right ventricular dilation and failure, increasing the risk for sudden cardiac death and often necessitating pulmonary valve replacement. These patients require close follow-up with serial cardiac imaging; however, the complex three-dimensional structure of these dilated right ventricles renders them difficult to adequately image with traditional two-dimensional echocardiography. Due to these difficulties, cardiac MRI is the current gold standard for assessing right ventricular size and function in these patients. However, cardiac MRI is costly and less accessible for patients than echocardiography. Although initial studies comparing 3D echocardiography with MRI showed that 3D echocardiography underestimates right ventricular size, recent advances in three-dimensional imaging technologies which utilize automated ultrasound speckle-tracking and artificial intelligence technology are lessening this inherent bias. Furthermore, the use of commercially-available ultrasound enhancing agents made of lipid microspheres has improved left ventricular endocardial border detection, inter-rater reliability and correlation of 3D echocardiography obtained estimates of left ventricular size and function compared with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). However, their use has yet to be applied to the three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle in congenital heart disease despite their ability to improve right ventricular endocardial border detection with three-dimensional echocardiography in adults. The investigators propose the novel integration of two echocardiographic technologies - three-dimensional echocardiography using semi-automated right ventricular analysis coupled with the administration of ultrasound enhancing agents - to change the paradigm of how clinicians assess the right ventricles of patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency. The investigators hypothesize that ultrasound enhancing agents will improve the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of various measures of right ventricular size and function, compared with cardiac MRI, thereby filling an important gap in existing methods for assessing right ventricular function. Lastly, because of the current limitations in assessing right ventricular function in this population, as a secondary aim, the investigators will also assess three-dimensional right ventricular strain -- a novel quantitative surrogate of right ventricular function. Overall Objectives: To shift the paradigm in the assessment of right ventricular size and function by developing a protocol to assess the right ventricles in patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency by integrating the use of three-dimensional echocardiography with semi-automated right ventricular analysis software with the intravenous administration of ultrasound enhancing agents. Specific Aim 1. To compare the accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 3D echocardiography-based measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, with and without contrast, with MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency. Specific Aim 2. To compare the accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 3D echocardiography measurement of right ventricular strain with MRI derived right ventricular (RV) strain in patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency.

Interventions

The patient will receive the weight-based dose of Lumason of 0.03 mL/kg per injection, not to exceed 2.4 mL per injection per the FDA and manufacturer recommendations.

Sponsors

Thomas Jefferson University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nemours Children's Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. All patients aged 11 or greater with repaired congenital heart disease and residual pulmonary insufficiency who are referred to Nemours A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children for clinically indicated cardiac MRI will be eligible for inclusion. 2. Informed written consent of parent or legal guardian. 3. Informed written assent of subject, if appropriate.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any patients in which Lumason is contraindicated (i.e. prior anaphylactoid reaction) will be ineligible for the clinical ultrasound and ineligible for the study. 2. History of allergic reaction to Lumason, sulfur hexafluoride, sulfur hexafluoride lipid microsphere components, or other ingredients in Lumason (polyethylene glycol, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol sodium (DPPG-Na), palmitic acid) 3. Pregnant women will be excluded from the study as well since Lumason has not been studied in pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.All images were obtained on the same day of the study. MRI analysis performed by clinical reading attending. Echo analysis performed offline after completing of imaging.Echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, with and without contrast, and MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease
Accuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Function Compared to MRI Derived Values.All images were obtained on the same day of the study. MRI analysis performed by clinical reading attending. Echo analysis performed offline after completing of imaging.Echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular ejection fraction, with and without contrast, and MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease
Inter-rater Reliability of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size and Function With and Without ContrastAll echocardiographic images obtained on the day of the study participation. Analysis done offline.The agreement of echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, with and without contrast, will be compared between the two readers using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing Echocardiographic and MRI Derived Right Ventricular Strain Measurement.Echocardiography and MRI images obtained on the day of study participation. Analysis done after image acquisition complete3D echocardiography measurement of right ventricular strain will be compared with MRI derived RV strain in patients with repaired congenital heart disease using an intraclass correlation coefficient.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Diagnostic Arm
Contrast enhanced 3D echo (Lumason)
25
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDiagnostic Arm
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
11 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants
Diagnosis
Other
3 Participants
Diagnosis
Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum
4 Participants
Diagnosis
Pulmonary stenosis
7 Participants
Diagnosis
Tetralogy of Fallot
9 Participants
Diagnosis
Truncus arteriosus
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Accuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Function Compared to MRI Derived Values.

Echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular ejection fraction, with and without contrast, and MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease

Time frame: All images were obtained on the same day of the study. MRI analysis performed by clinical reading attending. Echo analysis performed offline after completing of imaging.

Population: Two patients were unable to be analyzed for either the contrast or non-contrast group due to imaging quality and lack of complete 3D echo dataset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-contrast 3D EchoAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Function Compared to MRI Derived Values.52 percentageStandard Deviation 13.8
Contrast EchoAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Function Compared to MRI Derived Values.52.6 percentageStandard Deviation 5.9
Cardiac MRIAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Function Compared to MRI Derived Values.51.9 percentageStandard Deviation 6.5
Comparison: Measurements of right ventricular ejection fraction were compared between non-contrast echocardiogram and cardiac MRI using an intraclass coefficient
Comparison: Measurements of right ventricular ejection fraction were compared between contrast echocardiogram and cardiac MRI using an intraclass coefficient
Primary

Accuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.

Echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, with and without contrast, and MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease

Time frame: All images were obtained on the same day of the study. MRI analysis performed by clinical reading attending. Echo analysis performed offline after completing of imaging.

Population: Two patients were unable to be analyzed for either the contrast or non-contrast group due to imaging quality and lack of complete 3D echo dataset

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-contrast 3D EchoAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.RV End-Diastolic Volume (ml)187.1 mlStandard Deviation 55.3
Non-contrast 3D EchoAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.RV End-Systolic Volume (ml)86.0 mlStandard Deviation 32.1
Contrast EchoAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.RV End-Diastolic Volume (ml)175.4 mlStandard Deviation 53.3
Contrast EchoAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.RV End-Systolic Volume (ml)84.8 mlStandard Deviation 27.5
Cardiac MRIAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.RV End-Diastolic Volume (ml)205.0 mlStandard Deviation 51.6
Cardiac MRIAccuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.RV End-Systolic Volume (ml)100.0 mlStandard Deviation 32.2
Comparison: Measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volumes were compared between two groups using an intraclass coefficient
Comparison: Measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volumes were compared between two groups using an intraclass coefficient
Comparison: Measurements of right ventricular end-systolic volumes were compared between two groups using an intraclass coefficient
Comparison: Measurements of right ventricular end-systolic volumes were compared between two groups using an intraclass coefficient
Primary

Inter-rater Reliability of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size and Function With and Without Contrast

The agreement of echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, with and without contrast, will be compared between the two readers using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Time frame: All echocardiographic images obtained on the day of the study participation. Analysis done offline.

Secondary

Comparing Echocardiographic and MRI Derived Right Ventricular Strain Measurement.

3D echocardiography measurement of right ventricular strain will be compared with MRI derived RV strain in patients with repaired congenital heart disease using an intraclass correlation coefficient.

Time frame: Echocardiography and MRI images obtained on the day of study participation. Analysis done after image acquisition complete

Population: Images with sufficient quality were analyzed to obtain Global longitudinal strain values (expressed as a percentage)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-contrast 3D EchoComparing Echocardiographic and MRI Derived Right Ventricular Strain Measurement.23.1 percentage strainStandard Deviation 4.8
Contrast EchoComparing Echocardiographic and MRI Derived Right Ventricular Strain Measurement.21.3 percentage strainStandard Deviation 5
Cardiac MRIComparing Echocardiographic and MRI Derived Right Ventricular Strain Measurement.18.1 percentage strainStandard Deviation 4.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026