Skip to content

Efficacy of Gabapentin for Post-Covid-19 Olfactory Dysfunction

Efficacy of Gabapentin for Post-Covid-19 Olfactory Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05184192
Acronym
GRACE
Enrollment
68
Registered
2022-01-11
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
2023-08-29
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anosmia, COVID-19, Hyposmia, Olfactory Disorder, Parosmia

Brief summary

This study will investigate the efficacy of oral gabapentin in olfactory improvement following Covid-19- associated olfactory dysfunction. This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Detailed description

The drug will be given over a maximum 14 weeks with up to four weeks titrating up, eight weeks maintaining highest tolerable dose, and up to two weeks tapering down. Change in olfactory function from baseline to completion of 8-week fixed-dose period will be compared between the two study groups. Follow-up assessments will be conducted for both groups 4 weeks after completion of taper down.

Interventions

DRUGGabapentin gelatin capsules 300mg

Gabapentin is an anti-epileptic also used for nerve pain. This study will investigate the efficacy of gabapentin for olfactory nerve recovery and improvement in post-Covid-19 olfactory dysfunction.

DRUGPlacebo

lactose monohydrate NF

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double-blinded, both participants and investigators will be blinded. Intervention will be packaged in blinded fashion by pharmacist before being shipped to participants by research assistant

Intervention model description

Double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women between the ages of 18 and 65 years * Residing within the states of Missouri or Illinois * Clinically diagnosed or subjective olfactory dysfunction (anosmia, hyposmia, or parosmia) of 3 months duration or longer diagnosed within 2 weeks of Covid-19 infection * UPSIT score consistent with diminished olfactory function (score ≤ 33 in men and ≤ 34 in women). * Willing to respond daily to study surveys, preferably through smartphone with unlimited texting plan * In possession of ALL 7 household items: soap, burnt candle, peanut butter, herb, garlic, lemon, and coffee

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically diagnosed olfactory dysfunction secondary to genetic abnormalities or congenital dysfunction, trauma, non-Covid-19 viral infection, nasal polyps, neurodegenerative disorders * Current use of: azelastine, bromperidol, orophenadrine, oxomemazine, kratom, paraldehyde, or thalidomide * History of addiction to alcohol, cocaine, or opioids * Impaired renal function, myasthenia gravis, or myoclonus * Severe allergy to peanuts * Pregnancy or attempting pregnancy during study participation * Inability to participate in virtual trial due to lack of access to the internet or unlimited text messaging; inability to comprehend or use English language * Availability less than 6 months from time of enrollment * Residency in states other than Missouri or Illinois.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)After the 8 week FD phase and four week post-tapperThe primary outcome measure was the treatment response rate following the 8-week FD phase as determined by the CGI-I. The CGI-I is a modified 7-point Likert scale of -perceived change. Response options include: (1) much better, (2) somewhat better, (3) slightly better), (4) neither better nor worse, (5) slightly worse, (6) somewhat worse, (7) much worse. The response rate was defined as the number of participants self-reporting at least slightly better divided by the number of participants in each treatment group. Th

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Baseline, after completion of eight-week fixed-dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of taper-down periodForty different odors are presented in this test. Scoring: Forced choice of 4 responses to identify each smell. Anosmia: score 6-18; severe microsmia: score 19-25, moderate microsmia: 26-30 in women and 26-29 in men; mild microsmia: 31-34 in women and 30-33 in men; and normosmia: score \> 34 in women and \>33 in men. The total UPSIT score can range from 0 to 40 and scores. The MCID in UPSIT score is 4. Scores are interpreted as the level of absolute smell function (i.e., normosmia, mild hyposmia, moderate hyposmia, severe hyposmia, and anosmia), using the age- and sex-related normative classification system described in the UPSIT manual (Table 1)
Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)Baseline, after completion of eight-week fixed-dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of taper-down periodThe ODOR questionnaire is a validated 28-item patient-reported outcome measure which assesses the physical, functional, and emotional consequences of OD. The ODOR is a 28-item instrument with each item scored as either no difficulty or very rarely bothered (0) to complete difficulty or very frequently bothered (4) with a total instrument score range of 0 to 112 points. Higher scores indicate higher degree of dysfunction and limitation. the MCID is 15 points.
NASAL-7Baseline, after completion of eight-week fixed-dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of taper-down periodNASAL-7 is a simple diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction that is based on commonly found household items and can be used by adults who suspect olfactory dysfunction. The NASAL-7 was developed by Dr. Piccirillo and colleagues in the Clinical Outcomes Research Office. The NASAL-7, contains 7 household items with each item scored as 0 for 'Cannot Smell', 1 for 'Smells Less Strong/Different Than Normal', and 2 for 'Smells Normal', for a total possible score ranging from 0-14. The following four categories of olfactory function were defined based on NASAL-7 score: anosmia (score 0-4), severe dysfunction (score 5-7), mild dysfunction (score 8-10), and normosmia (score 11-14).
CGI-Severity of Smell8-week Fixed-Dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of Taper-Down phaseCGI-Severity. The CGI-Severity scale ranges from 1 to 7, where 1 is normal function and 7 is complete anosmia. This assessment will provide subjective data on patients' baseline olfactory function prior to beginning the trial, after 8-week Fixed-Dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of Taper-Down phase
CGI-S of Parosmia8-week Fixed-Dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of Taper-Down phaseClinical Global Impression-Severity Scale for Parosmics (CGI-P). The CGI-P Scale is a global rating of parosmia and the single global rating ranges from 1-5, where 1 is No Distortion, 2 is Mild Distortion, 3 is Moderate Distortion, 4 is Mostly Distorted, and 5 is Complete Distortion. The response on the CGI-P will provide information on the patient's perceived severity of the distortion of their smell.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gabapentin
This arm will be given the active treatment, oral Letco (gabapentin) gelatin capsules of 300mg each. Up to the first four weeks will be a titration period (week 1 300mg TID, week 2 600mg TID, week 3 900mg TID, week 4 1,200mg TID) as tolerated. If intolerable adverse reactions occur, the dosage will be decreased to prior tolerable dose (e.g., if 900mg TID is intolerable, dose will be decreased to 600mg TID). The following eight weeks will be fixed dose, the highest tolerable dose from the titration period. Up to two weeks will be a taper down tailored to the maximum dose the participant reached during the titration and fixed periods. A maximum 14 weeks will mark the end of active treatment. Follow-up assessments will be conducted 4 weeks after completion of the taper-down period. Gabapentin gelatin capsules 300mg: Gabapentin is an anti-epileptic also used for nerve pain. This study will investigate the efficacy of gabapentin for olfactory nerve recovery and improvement in post-Covid-19 olfactory dysfunction.
34
Placebo
Placebo gelatin capsules that look, smell, and taste like gabapentin capsules will be given to the placebo arm. To preserve double-blinding of the study, subjects will receive one capsule TID the first week, the second week two capsules TID, the third week three capsules TID, and fourth week four capsules TID as tolerated. If intolerable, the dose will be decreased to prior tolerable dose. The next eight weeks will be a fixed amount of placebo based on the highest tolerable amount from the titration period. Subjects will then taper-down placebo to imitate the gabapentin arm for maximum two weeks based on highest dose achieved during study. 4 weeks after completion of taper-down, follow-up assessments will be conducted. Placebo: lactose monohydrate NF
34
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event14
Overall StudyConcern for adverse effects04
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up47
Overall StudyMedication schedule10
Overall StudyPI withdrawal12
Overall StudyWithdrew due to adverse effect10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboGabapentin
Age, Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
CGI-S of parosmia
Complete distortion
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
CGI-S of parosmia
Mild distortion
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
CGI-S of parosmia
Moderate distortion
14 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
CGI-S of parosmia
Mostly distorted
23 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
CGI-S of parosmia
No distortion
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
CGI-S of smell
Absent
11 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
CGI-S of smell
Excellent
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
CGI-S of smell
Fair
10 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
CGI-S of smell
Good
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
CGI-S of smell
Poor
37 Participants20 Participants17 Participants
CGI-S of smell
Very good
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
NASAL-7 categories
Anosmia (0-4)
20 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
NASAL-7 categories
Mild dysfunction (8-10)
9 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
NASAL-7 categories
Normosmia (11-14)
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
NASAL-7 categories
Severe dysfunction (5-7)
28 Participants16 Participants12 Participants
Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)56 score on a scale (0-112)54.5 score on a scale (0-112)56 score on a scale (0-112)
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black / African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
56 Participants33 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants33 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
68 participants34 participants34 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants25 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)25.0 score on a scale (0-40)25.5 score on a scale (0-40)24.5 score on a scale (0-40)

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1811 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)

The primary outcome measure was the treatment response rate following the 8-week FD phase as determined by the CGI-I. The CGI-I is a modified 7-point Likert scale of -perceived change. Response options include: (1) much better, (2) somewhat better, (3) slightly better), (4) neither better nor worse, (5) slightly worse, (6) somewhat worse, (7) much worse. The response rate was defined as the number of participants self-reporting at least slightly better divided by the number of participants in each treatment group. Th

Time frame: After the 8 week FD phase and four week post-tapper

Population: 26 participants in the placebo group completed the treatment, but 25 participants completed the posttaper survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GabapentinClinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)Fixed Dose Period8 Participants
GabapentinClinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)4 week post tapper7 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)Fixed Dose Period20 Participants
PlaceboClinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I)4 week post tapper12 Participants
Secondary

CGI-Severity of Smell

CGI-Severity. The CGI-Severity scale ranges from 1 to 7, where 1 is normal function and 7 is complete anosmia. This assessment will provide subjective data on patients' baseline olfactory function prior to beginning the trial, after 8-week Fixed-Dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of Taper-Down phase

Time frame: 8-week Fixed-Dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of Taper-Down phase

Population: 26 participants in placebo group completed treatment, but 25 participants completed the posttaper survey. 18 participants in the gabapentin group completed treatment, but 16 participants completed the posttaper survey.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineAbsent4 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselinePoor12 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineFair1 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineGood1 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineVery good0 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineExcellent0 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseAbsent3 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DosePoor4 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseFair8 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseGood3 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseVery good0 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseExcellent0 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperAbsent2 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperPoor7 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperFair5 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperGood2 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperVery good0 Participants
GabapentinCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperExcellent0 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperPoor13 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineAbsent4 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseGood3 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselinePoor16 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperExcellent0 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineFair4 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseVery good1 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineGood1 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperFair6 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineVery good1 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseExcellent0 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellAssessments of the Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineExcellent0 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperVery good1 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseAbsent5 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperAbsent3 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DosePoor13 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellPost taperGood2 Participants
PlaceboCGI-Severity of SmellFixed DoseFair4 Participants
Secondary

CGI-S of Parosmia

Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale for Parosmics (CGI-P). The CGI-P Scale is a global rating of parosmia and the single global rating ranges from 1-5, where 1 is No Distortion, 2 is Mild Distortion, 3 is Moderate Distortion, 4 is Mostly Distorted, and 5 is Complete Distortion. The response on the CGI-P will provide information on the patient's perceived severity of the distortion of their smell.

Time frame: 8-week Fixed-Dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of Taper-Down phase

Population: 26 participants in placebo group completed treatment, but 25 participants completed the posttaper survey. 18 participants in the gabapentin group completed treatment, but 16 participants completed the posttaper survey.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineNo Distortion0 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseMild Distortion5 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineMostly Distorted9 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseNo Distortion1 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseComplete Distortion2 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperComplete Distortion2 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineMild Distortion0 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperMostly Distorted5 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseMostly Distorted6 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperModerate Distortion6 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineModerate Distortion2 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperMild Distortion2 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseModerate Distortion4 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperNo Distortion1 Participants
GabapentinCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineComplete Distortion7 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperNo Distortion1 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineComplete Distortion6 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineMostly Distorted8 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineModerate Distortion7 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineMild Distortion4 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaAssessments of Secondary Outcome Measures of Study Groups: BaselineNo Distortion1 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseComplete Distortion3 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseMostly Distorted6 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseModerate Distortion9 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseMild Distortion7 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaFixed DoseNo Distortion1 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperComplete Distortion2 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperMostly Distorted9 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperModerate Distortion9 Participants
PlaceboCGI-S of ParosmiaPost tapperMild Distortion4 Participants
Secondary

NASAL-7

NASAL-7 is a simple diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction that is based on commonly found household items and can be used by adults who suspect olfactory dysfunction. The NASAL-7 was developed by Dr. Piccirillo and colleagues in the Clinical Outcomes Research Office. The NASAL-7, contains 7 household items with each item scored as 0 for 'Cannot Smell', 1 for 'Smells Less Strong/Different Than Normal', and 2 for 'Smells Normal', for a total possible score ranging from 0-14. The following four categories of olfactory function were defined based on NASAL-7 score: anosmia (score 0-4), severe dysfunction (score 5-7), mild dysfunction (score 8-10), and normosmia (score 11-14).

Time frame: Baseline, after completion of eight-week fixed-dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of taper-down period

Population: 26 participants in placebo group completed treatment, but 25 participants completed the posttaper survey. 18 participants in the gabapentin group completed treatment, but 16 participants completed the posttaper survey.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GabapentinNASAL-7BaselineAnosmia (0-4)6 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7BaselineSevere dysfunction (5-7)8 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7BaselineMild dysfunction (8-10)2 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7BaselineNormosmia (11-14)2 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Fixed DoseAnosmia (0-4)4 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Fixed DoseSevere dysfunction (5-7)5 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Fixed DoseMild dysfunction (8-10)4 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Fixed DoseNormosmia (11-14)5 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Post taperAnosmia (0-4)5 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Post taperSevere dysfunction (5-7)6 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Post taperMild dysfunction (8-10)2 Participants
GabapentinNASAL-7Post taperNormosmia (11-14)3 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Post taperMild dysfunction (8-10)5 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7BaselineAnosmia (0-4)10 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Fixed DoseMild dysfunction (8-10)6 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7BaselineSevere dysfunction (5-7)12 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Post taperSevere dysfunction (5-7)6 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7BaselineMild dysfunction (8-10)3 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Fixed DoseNormosmia (11-14)4 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7BaselineNormosmia (11-14)1 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Post taperNormosmia (11-14)7 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Fixed DoseAnosmia (0-4)7 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Post taperAnosmia (0-4)7 Participants
PlaceboNASAL-7Fixed DoseSevere dysfunction (5-7)9 Participants
Secondary

Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)

The ODOR questionnaire is a validated 28-item patient-reported outcome measure which assesses the physical, functional, and emotional consequences of OD. The ODOR is a 28-item instrument with each item scored as either no difficulty or very rarely bothered (0) to complete difficulty or very frequently bothered (4) with a total instrument score range of 0 to 112 points. Higher scores indicate higher degree of dysfunction and limitation. the MCID is 15 points.

Time frame: Baseline, after completion of eight-week fixed-dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of taper-down period

Population: 26 participants in placebo group completed treatment, but 25 participants completed the posttaper survey.~18 participants in the gabapentin group completed treatment, but 16 participants completed the post-taper survey.~Each of the 28 items is scored 0 to 4. The maximum total score is 112 with higher scores representing greater quality of life impairment.~The MCID is 15.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
GabapentinOlfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)Baseline23 score on a scale (0-112)
GabapentinOlfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)Fixed Dose25.5 score on a scale (0-112)
GabapentinOlfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)Post Taper25 score on a scale (0-112)
PlaceboOlfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)Baseline54.5 score on a scale (0-112)
PlaceboOlfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)Fixed Dose49.9 score on a scale (0-112)
PlaceboOlfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)Post Taper45 score on a scale (0-112)
Secondary

University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)

Forty different odors are presented in this test. Scoring: Forced choice of 4 responses to identify each smell. Anosmia: score 6-18; severe microsmia: score 19-25, moderate microsmia: 26-30 in women and 26-29 in men; mild microsmia: 31-34 in women and 30-33 in men; and normosmia: score \> 34 in women and \>33 in men. The total UPSIT score can range from 0 to 40 and scores. The MCID in UPSIT score is 4. Scores are interpreted as the level of absolute smell function (i.e., normosmia, mild hyposmia, moderate hyposmia, severe hyposmia, and anosmia), using the age- and sex-related normative classification system described in the UPSIT manual (Table 1)

Time frame: Baseline, after completion of eight-week fixed-dose period, and 4 weeks after completion of taper-down period

Population: 26 participants in placebo group completed treatment, but 25 participants completed the posttaper survey. 18 participants in the gabapentin group completed treatment, but 16 participants completed the post-taper survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
GabapentinUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Baseline23 score on a scale (0-40)
GabapentinUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Fixed Dose25 score on a scale (0-40)
GabapentinUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Post-taper26 score on a scale (0-40)
PlaceboUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Baseline24 score on a scale (0-40)
PlaceboUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Fixed Dose25 score on a scale (0-40)
PlaceboUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Post-taper25 score on a scale (0-40)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026