Skip to content

The Ideal Sequence of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization with Endoscopic Coronary Revascularization

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Ideal Sequence of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization with Endoscopic Coronary Revascularization

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05184075
Acronym
HYBRID
Enrollment
4
Registered
2022-01-11
Start date
2023-01-09
Completion date
2024-11-09
Last updated
2024-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Hybrid coronary revascularization, Coronary revascularization

Brief summary

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR), a combination of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), has emerged as an alternative treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease patients. However, the ideal sequence (PCI or CABG) is unclear. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the best sequence within hybrid coronary revascularization using endoscopic coronary bypass grafting (i.e., first CABG then PCI versus first PCI then CABG)

Detailed description

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is an emerging approach for multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) which combines the excellent long-term outcomes of surgery with the early recovery and reduced short-term complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the best sequence within hybrid coronary revascularization remains unclear. When CABG is performed first (standard HCR), incomplete revascularization can cause acute coronary events in the interim period. On the other hand, when PCI is performed first (reverse HCR), bleeding risks may be higher since CABG should be performed on uninterrupted dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). The use of minimally invasive surgery techniques is associated with reduced bleeding because of the less surgical trauma and may offer the opportunity to perform reverse HCR due to the possibility to reduce the risk of bleeding. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the best sequence within hybrid coronary revascularization using endoscopic coronary bypass grafting (i.e., first CABG then PCI versus first PCI then CABG, figure 1)

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard hybrid coronary revascularization

Patients will undergo endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (endo-CABG) within four weeks after the diagnostic coronarography. Furthermore, they will receive a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within four weeks after the endo-CABG.

PROCEDUREReverse hybrid coronary revascularization

Patients will receive a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within four weeks after the diagnostic coronarography. Furthermore, they will undergo the endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (endo-CABG) within four weeks after the PCI.

Sponsors

Jessa Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Multivessel coronary disease, defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimation in 2 or more of the three major epicardial vessels or major side branches, with at least one or more one stenosis amenable to revascularization with PCI, if the patient cannot be full revascularized by surgery for a specific reason as determined by the Heart Team. Patients with a non-dominant right coronary artery may be included if the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex have ≥50% stenosis. * Age 18-85 * Willing and able to provide informed, written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Requirement for other cardiac or non-cardiac surgical procedures (e.g., valve replacement, carotid revascularization) * Cardiogenic shock and/or need for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support at the time of randomisation * Left main coronary artery disease * Contraindication for dual antiplatelet therapy * ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) * Previous cardiac surgery * Participation in other interventional clinical trials * Recent coronary intervention (PCI) * Ongoing high risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) * Life expectancy \< 1 year * Active bleeding more or equal to BARC 2 at time of randomisation * Requiring renal replacement therapy * Undergoing evaluation for organ transplantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30-day net adverse clinical event (NACE)From the first procedure until 30 days after the second procedure.NACE consists of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major bleeding unrelated to CABG (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 and 5) MACCE consists of: * Death from any cause * Myocardial infarction * Stroke * Target lesion revascularisation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Key secondary outcome: 30-day major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (BARC type 2, 3, 4, 5)From the first procedure until 30 days after the second procedureMajor or clinically relevant non-major bleeding is assessed using BARC type 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Key secondary outcome: One-year net adverse clinical event (NACE)From the first procedure until one year after the second procedureNACE consists of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major bleeding unrelated to CABG (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 and 5) MACCE consists of: * Death from any cause * Myocardial infarction * Stroke * Target lesion revascularisation
Key secondary outcome: one-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)From the first procedure until one year after the second procedureMACCE consists of: * Death from any cause * Myocardial infarction * Stroke * Target lesion revascularisation
Key secondary outcome: One-year major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (BARC type 2, 3, 4, 5)From the first procedure until one year after the second procedureMajor or clinically relevant non-major bleeding is assessed using BARC type 2, 3, 4, and 5.
MortalityFrom the first procedure until one year after the second procedureBoth all-cause mortality as the subdivision in cardiovascular death, noncardiovascular death and undetermined cause of death are examined.
Myocardial infarctionFrom the first procedure until one year after the second procedureMycardial infarction is subdivided into: * Periprocedural * Spontaneous
Stent thrombosisFrom the first procedure until one year after the second procedureStent thrombosis is subdivided into: * Definite stent thrombosis * Probable stent thrombosis * Possible stent thrombosis
Key secondary outcome: 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)From the first procedure until 30 days after the second procedureMACCE consists of: * Death from any cause * Myocardial infarction * Stroke * Target lesion revascularisation
RevascularizationFrom the first procedure until one year after the second procedureRevascularization is subdivided into: * Target lesion revascularization (TLR) * Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Graft failureFrom the first procedure until one year after the second procedureGraft failure describes total graft occlusion that prevents blood flow through the graft to the revascularized part of the heart.
BleedingFrom the first procedure until one year after the second procedureBleeding is assessed using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) bleeding classification and Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO). classification BARC is subdivided into type zero (no bleeding) until five (probable/definite fatal bleeding), while the TIMI classification is divided into minimal, minor, and major. Gusto is subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe.
Quality of Life (QoL) using the Short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire14, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days after the second procedureQoL will be questioned with the Short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.SF-36 scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Quality of Life (QoL) using the Euro Quality of Life 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire14, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days after the second procedureThe Euro Quality of Life 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire will be used to assess Quality of Life. Questions of the descriptive system are scored from one (no problem to perform activity) to five (severe problem/unable to perform activity). The scores are combined in order to calculate an index value (ranging from 0-1) that reflects the health state with one being the best health state. Moreover, the visual analogue scale ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst health state and 100 the best health state.
Quality of Life (QoL) using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire short-form (SAQ-7)14, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days after the second procedureQoL will be questioned with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire short-form (SAQ-7). The overall summary score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher ratings indicate a better health state.
Quality of Life (QoL) using the Rose Dyspnea Scale (RDS)14, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days after the second procedureThe Rose Dyspnea Scale (RDS) will be used to assess Quality of Life. RDS is scored between zero and four. Zero corresponds to no dyspnea with activity and four to dyspnea that severly limits activity.
StrokeFrom the first procedure until one year after the second procedureStroke is subdivided into: * Ischemic stroke * Hemorrhagic stroke * Non-specified stroke

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026