Skip to content

Effects of L-Citrulline or Citrulline-malate on Neuromuscular Performance in Resistance-trained Adults

Malate or Not?: Effects of L-Citrulline or Citrulline-malate on Neuromuscular Performance in Resistance-trained Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05183893
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-01-11
Start date
2022-02-15
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2022-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuromuscular Performance

Keywords

nitric oxide, dietary supplement, resistance training, citrulline malate

Brief summary

The main aim of this study is to compare the effects of L-Citrulline vs. Citrulline-malate on neuromuscular performance (maximal dynamic strength and maximal endurance strength) in resistance-trained adults.

Detailed description

Nitric oxide (NO) is a ubiquitous gaseous molecule that plays a critical role in the regulation of cardiovascular function and in the signaling of multiple cellular processes. Specifically, NO could reduce the oxygen cost of exercise and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in the production of muscle contractile force, improving calcium handling, glucose uptake and mitochondrial efficiency in muscle fibers. Therefore, it has been suggested that increasing the availability of NO through the oral intake of food and nutritional supplements may be useful to delay the onset of fatigue and improve performance in high-intensity efforts. L-citrulline is a nonessential amino acid involved in the urea cycle that acts as an endogenous precursor of L-arginine, being a more efficient alternative to L-arginine to increase the plasma concentration of L-arginine through the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) pathway. On the other hand, citrulline malate is an organic salt of L-citrulline and malate which has been shown to exert a small but significant ergogenic effect in different high-intensity efforts compared to a placebo. However, no study to date has compared L-citrulline VS. citrulline malate to assess whether there is an additive effect from malate to exercise performance. 50 resistance-trained adults (50% women) will be randomized into three conditions (L-citrulline, citrulline-malate and placebo conditions) with 48 hours of separation between conditions. 48h previous to the randomization the participants will perform a familiarization to avoid the learning effects. Each evaluation day will conform to the following tests: * Maximal dynamic strength of lower- and upper-body * Maximal endurance strength of lower- and upper-body

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTL-citrulline

5 g of L-citruline + 5 g of additives

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCitrulline-malate

8g of citrulline-malate + 2 g of additives

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

10g of maltodextrine

Sponsors

Universidad de Granada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy male or female * Ages 18-30years * BMI: 18-30.0 kg/m2 * Stable weight over the last 3 months (body weight changes\<3kg) * Previous experience in resistance training (i.e., at least 1 year with a frequency of two or more training sessions per week), * Participant must be capable and willing to provide consent, understand

Exclusion criteria

, instructions and protocols.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal endurance strength1 hourMaximal endurance strength of lower- and upper-body (squat and bench press exercises)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal dynamic strength1 hourMaximal dynamic strength of lower- and upper-body (squat and bench press exercises)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026