Skip to content

Adaptix RCT Evaluating Adaptix™ Versus PEEK Cages

Lumbar Fusion With Micro and Nano-textured Titanium Interbody Cages - A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Adaptix™ Versus PEEK Cages

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05182489
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-01-10
Start date
2021-11-19
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2026-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bony Growth Formation, Degenerative Disc Disease, Osteophyte, Spinal Canal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess and compare radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients who are to undergo combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion procedures, supplemented with pedicle screw instrumentation, using one of the following interbody cages; the Medtronic Adaptix™ cage with roughened micro and nano-textured titanium surfaces or the CAPSTONE® poly-ether-ether-ketone cage.

Detailed description

The randomized controlled trial will prospectively evaluate the efficacy of Medtronic Adaptix™ titanium implants supplemented with a pedicle screw system as compared to a Medtronic CAPSTONE® PEEK cage currently used in routine fashion for lumbar interbody fusion procedures. This study will capture clinical and radiographic outcomes on patients up to 2 years postoperatively. Both cages will be used in conjunction with a 50:50 mixture of autograft: allograft using milled local autograft bone and GRAFTON™ DBM DBF (no iliac crest autograft will be utilized). This single-centered study will enroll up to 100 subjects, with subjects followed for 24 months post-surgery. All subjects enrolled in the study will be recruited from a pool of subjects eligible for combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. The inclusion/exclusion criteria are listed below.

Interventions

DEVICEMedtronic Adaptix™ titanium implants

Patients who will be having a spinal fusion procedure as part of their standard of care treatment will be randomized to receive either the Medtronic titanium or the PEEK cage supplemented with a pedicle screw system and milled local autograft bone supplemented with GRAFTON DBM DBF. In order to assess fusion, patients will undergo a research-only CT Scan at 6 months post-surgery.

DEVICEMedtronic CAPSTONE® PEEK cage

Medtronic CAPSTONE® PEEK cage

Sponsors

Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Subjects will be blinded to their group status for the duration of the study assessments and procedures (24 months post-operatively).

Intervention model description

All subjects will be randomized in the trial to receive either the Medtronic titanium or the PEEK cage supplemented with a pedicle screw system and milled local autograft bone supplemented with GRAFTON™ DBM DBF. Subject randomization will be stratified according to smoking status. Subjects will be blinded to their group status for the duration of the study assessments and procedures (24 months post-operatively).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is scheduled to undergo combined interbody and posterolateral spinal fusion surgery using either the Medtronic Adaptix™ titanium cage or Medtronic CAPSTONE® PEEK cage in conjunction with a 50:50 mixture of local autograft and GRAFTON™ DBM DBF, and supplementation with a pedicle screw system. 2. Subject must be over the age of 18 years old. 3. Subject has been unresponsive to conservative care for a minimum of 6 months. 4. The subject must in the investigator's opinion, be psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including the required follow-up visits, the filling out of required forms, and have the ability to understand and give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with previous lumbar arthrodesis surgery. 2. Subjects requiring additional bone grafting materials other than local autograft bone or GRAFTON™ DBM DBF. 3. Subject has inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site. 4. Subject has an open wound local to the operative area, or rapid joint disease, bone absorption, or osteoporosis. 5. Subject has a condition requiring medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (i.e., oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressives, methotrexate, etc.). 6. Subject has an active local or systemic infection. 7. Subject has a metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity. 8. Subject is allergic to antibiotics (gentamicin) or processing solutions found in GRAFTON™. 9. Subject is morbidly obese, defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 45. 10. Subject has any medical condition or extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study. 11. Subject is currently involved in another investigational drug or device study that could confound study data. 12. Subject has a history (present or past) of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow-up. 13. Subjects who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next 12 months or who are lactating. 14. Subject is involved in or planning to engage in litigation or receiving Worker's Compensation related to neck or back pain. 15. Subject is a prisoner.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fusion rate at 6 months6 monthsA subject will be considered a success if fusion is a Grade BSF-3 at 6 months. The primary outcome measure of effectiveness will be determined by the fusion rate at 6 months post-operatively in subjects implanted with either titanium cage as compared to the PEEK cage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timing of fusion24 monthsSecondary measures of effectiveness will be determined by the principal investigator by evidence and timing of fusion observed in X-rays post-operatively (3, 6, 12, and 24 months).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026