Skip to content

Comparing Two Ways to Manage Head and Neck Lymphedema

Comparing Two Ways to Manage Lymphedema in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05182229
Enrollment
240
Registered
2022-01-10
Start date
2022-03-11
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer, Lymphedema

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare clinic-based CDT and home-based (a hybrid model) CDT on changes in the severity of lymphedema, symptom burden, functional status, and healthcare utilization in HNC survivors with lymphedema.

Detailed description

Primary aim: To compare the effects of clinic-based and home-based (a hybrid model) CDT on changes in the severity of lymphedema. Secondary aim: To compare the effects of clinic-based and home-based (a hybrid model) CDT on symptom burden and functional status. Exploratory aim: To compare the healthcare utilization between patients receiving clinic-based versus home-based (a hybrid model) CDT

Interventions

OTHERHome-based (a hybrid model) CDT

Participants will be provided therapist-administered, in person complete decongestive therapy (CDT) two times per week for two weeks (4 sessions), followed by real-time, virtual CDT consultations two times per week for three weeks (7 sessions) and one in person follow-up visit.

OTHERClinic-based CDT

Participants will be provided therapist administered, in-person CDT two times per week for six weeks (12 sessions).

Sponsors

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 years of age * \<=24 months post-HNC treatment * Diagnosis of head and neck lymphedema and referral by their oncology providers * Able to perform self-manual lymphatic drainage * Having an electronic device (a computer, tablet, iPad, laptop, or smartphone) and internet access at home

Exclusion criteria

* Active infection in soft tissues in the head and neck region * History of moderate or severe carotid artery occlusion * Significantly severe lymphedema (e.g., severe periorbital swelling) * Conditions impacting the safe delivery of lymphedema therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in severity of lymphedemaBaseline, Immediately after End of Intervention (an average of 6 weeks), 6-Month Post-Intervention, 12-Month Post-InterventionCompare the effects of clinic-based and home-based CDT on changes in the severity of lymphedema. This outcome measure will be assessed via Head and Neck - External Lymphedema and Fibrosis Assessment Criteria (HN-LEF Assessment Criteria).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in severity of symptom burdenBaseline, Immediately after End of Intervention (an average of 6 weeks), 6-Month Post-Intervention, 12-Month Post-InterventionCompare the effects of clinic-based and home-based CDT on changes in the severity of symptom burden. This outcome measure will be assessed via Head and Neck - Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory (HN-LEF Symptom Inventory)
Changes in degrees of jaw range of motionBaseline, Immediately after End of Intervention (an average of 6 weeks), 6-Month Post-Intervention, 12-Month Post-InterventionCompare the effects of clinic-based and home-based CDT on jaw range of motion. Jaw range of motion will be measured via Jaw Range of Motion Scale.
Changes in degrees of cervical range of motionBaseline, Immediately after End of Intervention (an average of 6 weeks), 6-Month Post-Intervention, 12-Month Post-InterventionCompare the effects of clinic-based and home-based CDT on cervical range of motion. Cervical Range of Motion will be measured via Cervical Range of Motion Instrument.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026