Skip to content

Transcutaneous Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury

Targeted Transcutaneous Stimulation to Restore Autonomic Cardiovascular Health in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05180227
Acronym
SCI
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-01-06
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2025-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

Blood pressure, Orthostatic hypotension, Transcutaneous stimulation, Cardiovascular disease

Brief summary

Cardiovascular disease has become the leading cause of death in the spinal cord injury population. Increased reliance on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is believed to decrease falls in blood pressure when moving from a laying down position to upright; however, findings in the general population link the RAAS with remodeling and restructuring of the arterial walls. Therefore, intervention to stabilize and normalize blood pressure should be a priority in individuals with spinal cord injury who have low blood pressure. Advances in stimulation on the skin of the spinal cord offer an approach to restore cardiovascular control and improve blood pressure regulation; however, electrode placement and stimulation parameters needed to increase blood pressure are not well understood. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify placement of electrodes on the skin, and frequency and amplitude of the stimulation to regulate blood pressure.

Detailed description

Although life expectancies have improved in the SCI population, longevity remains below the general population, due to increased incidence of cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of mortality in individuals with chronic SCI. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction and blood pressure instability contribute to the increased cardiovascular disease risk in the SCI population; however, because a majority of individuals with SCI remain asymptomatic the diagnosis and treatment of blood pressure instability is not a clinical priority. This is due, in part, to lack of safe and effective interventions, even though mounting evidence strongly supports adverse effects of blood pressure instability on the cerebral circulation, cognitive function, and quality of life. Identifying individualized transcutaneous stimulation parameters that safely and effectively increase and stabilize blood pressure in hypotensive individuals with SCI will provide the foundational evidence to support eventual wide-spread clinical utility throughout the VA healthcare system. 10 participants who are cleared, will go through multiple mapping sessions to find out the most appropriate electrode placement to increase seated blood pressure. The study will take approximately 1 to 13 study visits, of between 3-5 hours, per participant.

Interventions

DEVICEDS8R

transcutaneous stimulation of the spinal cord.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be blinded to which stimulation parameters they are receiving.

Intervention model description

All participants will complete transcutaneous stimulation mapping sessions to determine the optimal parameters to increase and maintain systolic blood pressure between 110-130 mmHg.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* above the age of 18 years old * individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries at or above T6 * duration of injury if more than 1 year * non-ambulatory * American spinal injury association scale A, B or C * able to provide consent * non-ventilator * hypotensive (males: systolic blood pressure less than 110 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure less than 70 mmHg; females: systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure less than 70 mmHg)

Exclusion criteria

* acute illness or infection * documented history of controlled or uncontrolled diabetes * any other neurological disease other than spinal cord injury * cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, peripheral artery disease, stroke) * present of history of thrombosis in the last 12 months, severe contractures * pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seated Systolic Blood PressureFrom enrollment to the end of the last study visit, approximately 30 days.Seated systolic blood pressure response to spinal cord stimulation at T7/T8, T9/10, T11/12, L1/L2) to determine the best cathode electrode placement on the spine that increases systolic blood pressure between 110-130 mmHg.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

10 potential participants were screened and enrolled between June 2022 and December 2023.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants Receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation to Increase and Stabilize Systolic Blood Pressure
Demographic, ethnic and spinal cord injury-specific characteristics of the participants enrolled in the trial
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyHypertension at screening1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants Receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation to Increase and Stabilize Systolic Blood Pressure
Age, Continuous44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8
AIS classification of injury
AIS A
4 Participants
AIS classification of injury
AIS B
4 Participants
AIS classification of injury
AIS C
2 Participants
Neurological level of spinal cord injury
Cervical
7 Participants
Neurological level of spinal cord injury
Thoracic
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
Time since injury15.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Seated Systolic Blood Pressure

Seated systolic blood pressure response to spinal cord stimulation at T7/T8, T9/10, T11/12, L1/L2) to determine the best cathode electrode placement on the spine that increases systolic blood pressure between 110-130 mmHg.

Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the last study visit, approximately 30 days.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No StimulationSeated Systolic Blood Pressure86 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.6
T7/8Seated Systolic Blood Pressure100.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.9
T9/10Seated Systolic Blood Pressure102.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.2
T11/12Seated Systolic Blood Pressure101.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.8
L1/2Seated Systolic Blood Pressure102.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026