Skip to content

Comprehensive Model for Evaluation of Surgical EPAs

Design of a Comprehensive Model for the Evaluation of Trustable Professional Activities in the General Surgery Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05179980
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-01-06
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2024-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Entrustable Professional Activities

Brief summary

Introduction. Competency-based medical education (CBME) frameworks have become increasingly prevalent among surgical education accreditation bodies. Medical schools, postgraduate training programs, and licensing bodies conduct assessments to certify the competence of future practitioners, and judge the adequacy of training programs. Methods. A prospective cohort study was designed to evaluate clinical-surgical competencies in all residents of a general surgery program. All medical residents of the general surgery program of the Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the Autonomous University of Chihuahua, were video recorded with consent, in the field (Outpatient consultation, Surgical ward, Inpatient room, Classroom), for posterior evaluation by the professors of the program with electronic rubrics made with Google forms.

Detailed description

A prospective cohort study was designed to evaluate clinical-surgical competencies in residents of the general surgery program during the 2020-2021 academic year at a single, secondary care, public medical institution. For this purpose a previously validated instrument for the comprehensive evaluation of clinical-surgical competencies was used (9), which considered five dimensions, derived from the Single Plan for Medical Specialties in terms of 1-3) Clinical-surgical care (preoperative, transoperative and postoperative management), 4) Search and transfer of knowledge, and 5) Research proficiency. Each instrument was composed of 6 to 7 items, graduated in four levels of achievement; a) responsive, b) resolutive, c) autonomous, and d) strategic. All surgery residents were video recorded with consent, in the field (Outpatient consultation, Surgical ward, Inpatient room, Classroom) for posterior self-evaluation, co-evaluation and hetero-evaluation with electronic rubrics made with Google forms.

Interventions

OTHERAssessment

Evaluation of clinical-surgical competencies with a previously validated instrument.

Sponsors

Hospital General de Chihuahua - Dr. Salvador Zubirán Anchondo
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
23 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Residents in an universitary general surgery program

Exclusion criteria

* Staff surgeons * Residents from another universitary program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Entrustable Professional Activities2020-2024 academic yearsImportant work tasks that trainees need to be able to perform with supervision at a distance by the end of Basic Training

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026