Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Supraumbilical Surgery

Is Erector Spinae Plane Block More Effective Than Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Supraumbilical Surgery in Adult Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05179928
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-01-06
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2026-03-01
Last updated
2025-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain

Keywords

Erector Spinae Plane Block, Rectus Sheath Block, Regional Analgesia

Brief summary

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) in providing postoperative analgesia after supraumbilical surgery in adult patients and their impact on the patient's outcomes. Background: Supraumbilical surgery for hernia repair is the second-most-popular after surgical inguinal hernia repair and is accompanied by moderate to severe postoperative pain, so patients always require large doses of opioids within the first postoperative day. Because opioids have several adverse effects such as drowsiness, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, regional analgesic techniques are an essential component of postoperative opioid-sparing analgesia. Previous studies have shown that regional analgesic techniques after abdominal wall surgeries can be an essential element of a postoperative pain management strategy with minimal adverse effects and hemodynamic responses. ESPB provides both somatic and visceral analgesia to the abdominal wall, through the blockade of the anterior rami of spinal nerves and the rami communicants involving sympathetic nerve fibers. RSB provides analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall from the xiphoid process to the symphysis pubis, through the blockade of the anterior rami of the 7th to 12th intercostal nerves. The dermatomal distribution of ESPB and RSB makes them ideal regional analgesic techniques after abdominal surgery, and to our knowledge, there were no previous trials that studied the difference between them. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized (1:1), double-blind clinical trial on 60 patients scheduled for elective supraumbilical surgery under general anesthesia at our hospital. Patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each) and will receive: in group E; general anesthesia with postoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB, whereas in group R; general anesthesia with postoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided RSB.

Interventions

Postoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-guided ESPB

Postoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-guided RSB

Sponsors

Damanhour Teaching Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤ II * Age from 21 to 60 years * Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 35 kg/m²

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status \> II * Age \< 21 years or \> 60 years * Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35 * Local infection at the puncture site * Altered mental status * Pregnant women * Allergy to study drugs * Chronic pain * Coagulation abnormalities or on anticoagulants * Severe hepatic or kidney disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean and Standard deviation of time to the first request of postoperative rescue analgesic (minutes) (mean±SD)24 hours after block performanceThe time interval between the block performance and the first request of postoperative analgesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean and Standard deviation of Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score (mean±SD)24 hours after block performanceNPRS measures the severity of postoperative pain, it is a 11 point scale from 0-10; where 0=No pain and 10=Worst possible pain (30 minutes, 1h, 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h) after block performance
Mean and Standard deviation of the total dose of the rescue analgesic consumed (milligrams) (mean±SD)24 hours after block performanceThe total dose of the rescue analgesic consumed in the first 24 hours after block performance
Number of participants and Rate of Postoperative Complications24 hours after block performanceNumber of participants and Rate of: Nausea, Vomiting, Hematoma formation, Bowel perforation, and Pneumothorax

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed M Shaat, MD
ahmedshaat99@gmail.com00201223482709

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026