Skip to content

Adjunctive Benefit of Electrolytic Cleaning on Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis.

Adjunctive Benefit of Electrolytic Cleaning on Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis. A 1-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05179746
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-01-05
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2024-09-01
Last updated
2022-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Keywords

treatment of peri-implantitis, electrolytic cleaning

Brief summary

Evaluate the outcomes of non-surgical therapy of peri-implantitis with the adjunctive use of electrolytic cleaning (Galvo Surge®). The proposed protocol, focused on the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis, will result in a higher percentage of subjects with disease resolution (probing depts ≤ 5mm, absence of BOP and/or SOP and no further bone loss) at 1 year of follow-up.

Detailed description

The adjunctive use of electrolytic cleaning (Galvo Surge®) in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis will result in a higher reduction of probing depth than the control group. The adjunctive use of electrolytic cleaning (Galvo Surge®) in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis will result in a higher radiographic bone fill of the peri-implant defect than the control group. The adjunctive use of electrolytic cleaning (Galvo Surge®) in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis will result in a lower count of peri-implant pathogens than the control group.

Interventions

DEVICEImplants are decontaminated with electrolytic cleaning

Implants are decontaminated with electrolytic cleaning

DEVICEImplants are decontaminated without electrolytic cleaning

Implants are decontaminated without electrolytic cleaning

Sponsors

University of Lisbon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Partially edentulous patients, rehabilitated with at least one dental implant in the maxilla or mandible; 2. Presence of Peri-implantitis; 3. No implant mobility; 4. Treated periodontal disease; 5. No systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of the therapy (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, bisphosphonate medication). 6. Non-smoker or light smoking status in smokers (\<10 cigarettes/day).

Exclusion criteria

(1) Pregnant, lactating women and non-collaborating patients will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probing pocket depthAssessing the change of probing pocket depth from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsWill be calculated as the distance from the gingival peri-implant margin to the bottom of the peri-implant pocket (Mombelli & Lang, 1994).
RecessionAssessing the change of recession from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthswill be measured as the distance from the free marginal mucosa to the most apical portion of the crown.
Clinical attachment levelAssessing the change from clinical attachment level from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthswill be calculated as the sum of PPD and REC (distance from the most apical portion of the crown to the bottom of the periodontal pocket)
Bleeding on probingAssessing the change from bleeding on probing from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthswill be assessed dichotomously in six sites per implant (Heitz-Mayfield, 2008).
Radiographic ParametersAssessing the change of the radiographic parameters from baseline at 3 months, 6 monthsRadiographic analysis through orthopantomography, periapical intraoral radiographs according to the parallelometric technique (using a silicone bite record so that the radiographs are parallelized and comparable to each other in different timepoints, checking in millimeters the increase or decrease in bone loss).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Microbiological ParametersAssessing the change of the microbiological parameters from baseline at 3 months, 6 monthsA sterilized paper tip from the microbiological kit will be introduced in the periimplantitis pocket, remaining in the same position for 10 seconds. After collecting the sample, the paper tip will be placed in an individual transfer tube, properly identified. Afterwards, the sample will be sent to the laboratory, where a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test is performed to identify the following bacteria - A. actinomycetemcomitans, T. forsythia, T. denticola, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia and F. nucleatum.

Contacts

Primary ContactVanessa Rocha Rodrigues, Dr
vanessa_15_rodrigues@hotmail.com919950890

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026