Skip to content

Posoleucel (ALVR105) for the Treatment of Adenovirus Infection in Pediatric and Adult Participants Receiving Standard of Care Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial, With Cross-Over, of Posoleucel (ALVR105) for the Treatment of Adenovirus Infection in Pediatric and Adult Participants Receiving Standard of Care Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05179057
Enrollment
57
Registered
2022-01-05
Start date
2022-04-26
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenovirus Infection

Keywords

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, Adenoviremia, Adenovirus, Stem Cell Transplant, Posoleucel, ALVR105, Bone Marrow Transplant

Brief summary

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of Posoleucel for the treatment of adenovirus (AdV) infection in pediatric and adult allo-HCT recipients receiving standard of care (SoC).

Detailed description

During the period of immune recovery after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT), viral infections and reactivations, including those with AdV, are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Progression to AdV disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will assess the safety and efficacy of Posoleucel for the treatment of AdV infection in pediatric and adult allo-HCT recipients receiving SoC.

Interventions

DRUGPosoleucel

Administered as 2-4 milliliter infusion, visually identical to placebo

DRUGPlacebo

Administered as 2-4 milliliter infusion, visually identical to Posoleucel

Sponsors

AlloVir
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with option for blinded crossover to assess the safety and efficacy of posoleucel as compared to placebo for the treatment of AdV infection in pediatric and adult recipients of HCT with AdV infections receiving SoC.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergone allogeneic cell transplantation ≥21 days prior to dosing * Meet one of the below criteria: 1. AdV viremia DNA ≥10,000 copies/mL, OR 2. AdV viremia DNA results of ≥1,000 copies/mL, AND 1. has absolute lymphocyte count \<180/mm3, OR 2. has received T cell depletion OR 3. had a cord blood transplant.

Exclusion criteria

* Grade 3 or higher acute GVHD * Ongoing therapy with high-dose systemic corticosteroids * Uncontrolled viral (other than AdV), bacterial, or fungal infection(s) * Pregnant or lactating female unwilling to discontinue nursing prior to randomization * History of severe prior reactions to blood product transfusions NOTE: Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criterion may apply.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Undetectable Adenovirus InfectionDay 29 through Day 43 (Day 29 + 14 days; up to 43 days post-first infusion)Viral load of adenovirus was measured at the central laboratory using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from blood and stool samples at each study visit and on Day 29 from a nasopharyngeal swab. There was a 14-day window for participants who crossed over from posoleucel to placebo; and for participants who crossed over from placebo to posoleucel, the pre-dose cross-over Day 1 viral load was used. Participants missing the primary endpoint but having undetectable viremia before Day 29 and after Day 43 were imputed as successes. Undetectable adenovirus viremia was less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ).
Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to 34 weeksA TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with a start date and time on or after the first dose of study treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE that met at least one of the following serious criteria: fatal, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or other important medical event. TEAEs of special interest (AESI) included acute or chronic graft versus host disease, cytokine release syndrome, infusion-related reactions, and graft failure or rejection. Treatment-related refers to the assessment of a relationship between study treatment and the event by the investigator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adenovirus Viremia <400 Copies/mL at Day 29Day 29
Number of Participants With Overall Disease ProgressionFrom Day 29 up to Week 10
Number of Participants With Adenovirus Disease Recurrence34 weeks
Time to Undetectable Adenovirus Viremia (Less Than LLOQ)Pre-dose to 34 weeks
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Adenovirus Viral LoadPre-dose and Day 29

Countries

Canada, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 47 study centers in the United States, Canada, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, and participated from April 2022 to January 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with adenovirus infection receiving standard of care following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either posoleucel or placebo. Randomization was stratified by level of viremia (≥10,000 copies/mL or \<10,000 copies/mL adenovirus DNA) and age (≥12 years or \<12 years).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Posoleucel, Then Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive 2 sequential infusions of posoleucel, separated by 14 ± 3 days. The Primary Study Period included a 4-week efficacy evaluation followed by a 20-week safety follow-up. Eligible participants who experienced progression to active target organ disease or progression of existing target organ disease could cross-over to placebo treatment between Day 29 and Week 10. In the Cross-Over Period, participants received 2 sequential infusions of placebo, separated by 14 ± 3 days. The Cross-over Period included a 4-week efficacy evaluation followed by a 20-week safety follow-up.
30
Placebo, Then Posoleucel
Participants were randomized to receive 2 sequential infusions of placebo, separated by 14 ± 3 days. The Primary Study Period included a 4-week efficacy evaluation followed by a 20-week safety follow-up. Eligible participants who experienced progression to active target organ disease or progression of existing target organ disease could cross-over to posoleucel treatment between Day 29 and Week 10. In the Cross-Over Period, participants received 2 sequential infusions of placebo, separated by 14 ± 3 days. The Cross-over Period included a 4-week efficacy evaluation followed by a 20-week safety follow-up.
27
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event32
Overall StudyDiscontinuation or withdrawal by participants/parent/legal guardian22
Overall StudyNever received primary or cross-over study treatment13
Overall StudyNon-compliance with protocol requirements or study-related procedures10
Overall StudyStudy terminated137

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPosoleucel, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then PosoleucelTotal
Age, Continuous16.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
14.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.36
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants23 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
19 Participants20 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants11 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 281 / 230 / 51 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 2823 / 235 / 53 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 2816 / 233 / 51 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with a start date and time on or after the first dose of study treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE that met at least one of the following serious criteria: fatal, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or other important medical event. TEAEs of special interest (AESI) included acute or chronic graft versus host disease, cytokine release syndrome, infusion-related reactions, and graft failure or rejection. Treatment-related refers to the assessment of a relationship between study treatment and the event by the investigator.

Time frame: Up to 34 weeks

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any amount of posoleucel or placebo and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE27 Participants
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE related to study treatment7 Participants
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AESI6 Participants
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE16 Participants
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE related to study treatment1 Participants
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study treatment discontinuation2 Participants
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation1 Participants
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to death2 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study treatment discontinuation1 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE related to study treatment1 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE related to study treatment9 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to death1 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation2 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE16 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AESI9 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE23 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation0 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AESI1 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE3 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE related to study treatment1 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study treatment discontinuation0 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to death0 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE5 Participants
Posoleucel (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE related to study treatment1 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AESI2 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE1 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE related to study treatment1 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE3 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE related to study treatment1 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to death1 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation1 Participants
Placebo (Cross-over Period)Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE leading to study treatment discontinuation2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Undetectable Adenovirus Infection

Viral load of adenovirus was measured at the central laboratory using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from blood and stool samples at each study visit and on Day 29 from a nasopharyngeal swab. There was a 14-day window for participants who crossed over from posoleucel to placebo; and for participants who crossed over from placebo to posoleucel, the pre-dose cross-over Day 1 viral load was used. Participants missing the primary endpoint but having undetectable viremia before Day 29 and after Day 43 were imputed as successes. Undetectable adenovirus viremia was less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ).

Time frame: Day 29 through Day 43 (Day 29 + 14 days; up to 43 days post-first infusion)

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of posoleucel or placebo. Only participants in the mITT population who completed through Day 29 or discontinued early were included.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Posoleucel, Then PlaceboNumber of Participants With Undetectable Adenovirus Infection11 Participants
Placebo, Then PosoleucelNumber of Participants With Undetectable Adenovirus Infection9 Participants
95% CI: [0.26, 3.69]
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) Adenovirus Viral Load

Time frame: Pre-dose and Day 29

Population: Data not collected due to early termination after DSMB futility analysis concluded the study was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.

Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved Adenovirus Viremia <400 Copies/mL at Day 29

Time frame: Day 29

Population: Data not collected due to early termination after DSMB futility analysis concluded the study was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Adenovirus Disease Recurrence

Time frame: 34 weeks

Population: Data not collected due to early termination after DSMB futility analysis concluded the study was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Overall Disease Progression

Time frame: From Day 29 up to Week 10

Population: Data not collected due to early termination after Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) futility analysis concluded the study was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.

Secondary

Time to Undetectable Adenovirus Viremia (Less Than LLOQ)

Time frame: Pre-dose to 34 weeks

Population: Data not collected due to early termination after DSMB futility analysis concluded the study was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026