Skip to content

Phase III Clinical Study of NPB-01 in Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis

Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NPB-01 in Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis Refractory to Steroid Pulse Therapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05177939
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-01-05
Start date
2022-03-03
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2022-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autoimmune Encephalitis

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of NPB-01 in patients with autoimmune encephalitis refractory to steroid pulse therapy using steroid pulse therapy as a control.

Interventions

DRUGNPB-01

NPB-01 will be administered for the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis

DRUGNPB-01-ME

NPB-01-ME will be administered for the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis

Sponsors

Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \< At 1st registration \> Patients meeting the possible diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with a CASE score of 5 to 22 during the screening period * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with autoimmune encephalitis in progress (active and requiring therapeutic intervention) * \< At 1st registration \> IVIG therapy and steroid pulse therapy are considered necessary by the investigator. * \< At 1st registration \> Patients aged 15 years or older at the time of informed consent * \< At 2nd registration \> Patients who meet any of the following (1) to (6): 1. Definite diagnostic criteria for autoimmune limbic encephalitis 2. MRI evidence of demyelination (probable autoimmune encephalitis) 3. Probabilistic diagnostic criteria for anti-NMDAR encephalitis 4. Probabilistic diagnostic criteria for Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis 5. Probabilistic diagnostic criteria for Hashimoto's encephalopathy 6. Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Encephalitis with Negative but Probable Autoantibodies * \< At 2nd registration \> CASE score of 5 to 22 on Day 8 of the previous treatment period * \< At 2nd registration \> Patients who have had an inadequate response to steroid pulse therapy

Exclusion criteria

* \< At 1st registration \> Patients with strongly suspected infectious encephalitis * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who received immunoglobulin preparations within 8 weeks prior to informed consent * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who received plasma exchange within 4 weeks prior to informed consent * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who received immunosuppressants (Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, etc.) within 4 weeks prior to informed consent * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who have had tumor resection associated with autoimmune encephalitis within 4 weeks prior to informed consent * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with a history of shock or hypersensitivity to the ingredients of NPB-01 * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with known IgA deficiency * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with renal disorder * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with a current or previous history of cerebral or cardiovascular disorders (Asymptomatic cerebral infarction and myocardial infarction that occurred more than 5 years ago are not applicable.) * \< At 1st registration \> Patients at high risk of thromboembolism * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with haemolytic/blood loss anaemia * \< At 1st registration \> Immunosuppressed/immunocompromised patients * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with decreased cardiac function * \< At 1st registration \> Pregnant, expected (desired or planned) pregnant, or breastfeeding patients * \< At 1st registration \> Use of prohibited medications or treatment in this study * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who received investigational product in this study (re-enrollment prohibited) * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who have received treatment with investigational product other than this study within 4 months prior to informed consent * \< At 1st registration \> Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to methylprednisolone sodium succinate * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who have a tumor associated with autoimmune encephalitis and are considered to require resection during the study period. * \< At 1st registration \> Patients receiving intravenous general anesthetics or sedative hypnotics * \< At 1st registration \> Patients in coma * \< At 1st registration \> Ventilated patients * \< At 1st registration \> Patients who cannot undergo protocol-specified tests/assessments * \< At 1st registration \> Other patients considered ineligible for the study by the investigator * \< At 2nd registration \> Positive herpes simplex virus DNA qualitative test in the screening period. * \< At 2nd registration \> Serum creatinine ≥ 2 times the upper limit of normal during the screening period. * \< At 2nd registration \> Total protein ≥ 9 g/dL during the screening period. * \< At 2nd registration \> Patients with hematocrit ≥ 55% during the screening period * \< At 2nd registration \> Patients who meet any of the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of responders in CASE (Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis)4 weeksA responder is defined as a patient whose CASE score at Week 4 of the post-treatment follow-up period after treatment with investigational product improved by 40% or more compared to the pre-treatment period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mRS1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeksChanges in mRS at each time point after the start of investigational product treatment compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
GCS1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeksTo compare the change in GCS at each time point after the start of investigational product with that on Day 8 of the pretreatment period between the arms.
MMSE-J4, 8, 12 weeksThe change in MMSE-J at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
FAB4, 8, 12 weeksThe change in FAB at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
Disappearance of abnormal EEG findings4, 12 weeksThe proportion of subjects in whom abnormal findings in EEG disappeared at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
CASE1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeksThe change in CASE score at each time point after the start of treatment with investigational product compared with that on Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms. Changes in CASE scores divided into three segments (0 -4: excellent, 5 -9: moderate, 10 -27: poor) will also be compared. In addition, the period until CASE score becomes 4 points or less after the start of treatment with investigational product will be checked.
Cerebrospinal fluid test4, 12 weeksThe proportion of subjects in whom the cell count returned to within the reference range (≤ 5/μl) and the proportion of subjects in whom the protein count returned to within the reference range (15.0 \ 45.0 mg/dL) at each time point after the start of investigational product treatment as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be checked.
Duration of hospitalization12 weeksDuration of hospitalization after the start of treatment with investigational product to be compared between the arms.
mRS proportion1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeksThe proportions of subjects with an mRS score of ≤ 2, subjects with an improvement of ≥ 1 point, and subjects with an improvement of ≥ 2 points will also be compared. Also, the time to mRS improvement after the start of treatment with investigational product (≤ 2 points, ≥ 1 point improvement, ≥ 2 points improvement) .
GCS proportion1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeksChanges in GCS when divided into three segments (15-13: Mild, 12-9: Moderate, 8-3: Severe) will also be compared. In addition, the period until the GCS score reaches 13 or higher after the start of treatment with investigational product will be checked.
Disappearance of abnormal head MRI findings4, 12 weeksThe proportion of subjects in whom abnormal findings in head MRI disappeared at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Primary ContactMamoru Ota
kaihatsu@nihon-pharm.co.jp03-5148-7574

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026