Skip to content

Venetoclax + Decitabine vs. 7+3 Induction Chemotherapy in Young AML

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined With Decitabine Versus Conventional 7+3 Induction Chemotherapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Young Adults

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05177731
Enrollment
188
Registered
2022-01-05
Start date
2022-03-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AML, Adult, Chemotherapy Effect

Keywords

Venetoclax, AML, young, induction therapy

Brief summary

This research is being done to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a promising (venetoclax and decitabine) versus conventional 7+3chemotherapy in induction young patients with acute myeloid leukemia. This study involves the following: Venetoclax and decitabine (investigational combination) Cytarabine and idarubicin (per standard of care)

Detailed description

This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 randomized clinical trial to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of venetoclax and decitabine to the conventional induction chemotherapy (7+3 regimen) among fit, young adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Conventional induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine is the standard of induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The FDA has approved the combination therapy of venetoclax and decitabine for elderly (\> 60 year old) patients with newly diagnosed AML not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Venetoclax is an inhibitor of BCL-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2, a protein that initiates tumor growth, disease progression, and drug resistance), which can lead to cancer cell death. Decitabine, a demethylation agent, has the potential to synergically target leukemia stem cell populations when combined with venetoclax as its homologous drug azacytidine. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the different induction groups and followed with either consolidation chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after remission. After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up every 3 to 6 months for up to 2 years. It is expected that about 188 people will take part in this research study.

Interventions

DRUGVenetoclax

Orally by mouth

Intravenous infusion

DRUGCytarabine

Intravenous infusion

DRUGIdarubicin

Intravenous infusion

DRUGGilteritinib

Orally by mouth

Sponsors

Chen Suning
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

De novo adult AML patients randomly assigned to two induction treatment groups: venetoclax+decitabine group and conventional idarubicin(12mg/m2)+cytarabine group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, 59 \> =Age (years) \>= 18; 2. Newly diagnosed as AML patients according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification; 3. Patients have not received prior therapy for AML (except hydroxyurea and Ara-C\<1.0g/d); 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status of 0,1, 2 ; 5. Liver function: Total bilirubin ≦3 upper limit of normal (ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≦3 ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT)≦3 ULN(except extramedullary infiltration of leukemia) 6. Renal function:Ccr(Creatinine Clearance Rate) ≧30 ml/min; 7. Patients who sign the informed consent must have the ability to understand and be willing to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute promyeloid leukemia; 2. AML with central nervous system (CNS) infiltration; 3. Patients have received prior hypomethylating agents (HMA) therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and progressed to AML; 4. HIV infection; 5. Patients with severe heart failure (grade 3-4) ; 6. Evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s) including, but not limited to: a) Uncontrolled and/or active systemic infection (viral, bacterial or fungal); b) Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV) requiring treatment. c) An active second cancer that requires treatment within 6 months of study entry 7. Patients deemed unsuitable for enrolment by the investigator; 8. Patients willing to receive intensive induction chemotherapy 9. Female who are pregnant, breast feeding or childbearing potential without a negative urine pregnancy test at screen; 10. Patients reject to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall response rate (ORR)From randomization to 2 cycles of induction before consolidation therapy(100 days)Complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery/Morphologic Leukemia Free State

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of severe infection (>=grade 3 )From randomization to 2 cycles of induction before consolidation therapy(100 days)Assessed using CTCAE 5
Duration of myelosuppressionFrom randomization to 2 cycles of induction before consolidation therapy(100 days)The duration of absolute value of peripheral blood neutrophils \<0.5×10\^9/L and platelet count \<50×10\^9/L during myelosuppression.
Event free survivalFrom the time from randomization to time for up to 2 yearsEvents include progressive disease, relapse, changes in treatment regimens, fatal or intolerable side effects and any death.
Overall survivalFrom the time from randomization to time for up to 2 yearsOverall survival
Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativityFrom randomization to 2 cycles of induction before consolidation therapy(100 days)Percentage of participants who converted to MRD \< 10\^-3 before initiation of consolidation therapy.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026