Skip to content

Fertility Decision-Making in Youth and Young Adults

Fertility Decision-Making in Youth and Young Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05175170
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-01-03
Start date
2021-06-03
Completion date
2021-10-09
Last updated
2023-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Transgender Adolescents & Young Adults

Keywords

fertility, decision-making

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to test if using a web-based medical decision-making tool on the topics of fertility and fertility-preservation increases knowledge among transgender youth and young adults.

Detailed description

The pilot trial of Aid for Fertility-Related Medical Decisions (AFFRMED) is a single-arm, pre-/post- feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy trial. 10 transgender adolescents and young adults (AYA) and 10 parents of transgender AYA participated in a 90-120 min, virtual research visit via Zoom. During this visit they completed pre-test measures of fertility knowledge and decisional self-efficacy, followed by up to 1 hour to freely navigate AFFRMED decision aid. After using AFFRMED, participants completed post-test measures of fertility knowledge and decisional self-efficacy, as well as implementation outcomes measures (Acceptability of Intervention, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, and Feasibility of Intervention Measure).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDecision-aid

The decision aid consists of domains related to human reproduction, fertility, and fertility preservation. The domains address priority learning objectives in each domain to increase knowledge on the impact of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility and fertility preservation options.

Sponsors

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* (1) youth is between the ages of 8-14 years * (2) youth self-asserts a transgender identity * (3) youth has expressed interest in GnRHa or is currently on GnRHa treatment; or * (1) AYA is between the ages of 13-24 years, * (2) AYA self-asserts a transgender identity, and * (3) AYA has expressed interest in gender-affirming hormone (GAH) or is currently on GAH treatment. * Parents of eligible youth will be eligible to participate.

Exclusion criteria

* (1) youth/parents are unable to read, speak or understand English * (2) youth/parents are unable or unwilling to provide consent/assent/parental permission for study participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fertility-related KnowledgePre-treatment and immediately post-treatment (same day)The primary study outcome is change in fertility-related knowledge from same-day pre-AFFRMED to post-AFFRMED exposure. Participants will complete a fertility-related knowledge test instrument immediately prior to AFFRMED exposure. Participants will be given 1 hour to freely navigate the web-based AFFRMED prototype. Thereafter, participants will get a 5-minute break before completing a post-AFFRMED fertility knowledge test. The knowledge test consists of 41 items, and reflects a percentage correct score ranging from 0-100% correct. The Mean Difference results reflect the difference in fertility knowledge test mean scores between pre-AFFRMED and post-AFFRMED exposure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Decisional Self-EfficacyPre-treatment and immediately post-treatment (same day)The secondary study outcome is change in decisional self-efficacy for fertility-related decision-making from same-day pre-AFFRMED to post-AFFRMED exposure using the Decision Self Efficacy Scale. Decision Self Efficacy Scale scores range from 0 \[not at all confident\] to 100 \[very confident\]. A score of 0 indicates 'extremely low self-efficacy' and a score of 100 indicates 'extremely high self-efficacy'. The Mean Difference results reflect the difference in decisional self-efficacy mean scores between pre-AFFRMED and post-AFFRMED exposure.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant-Reported Feasibility of AFFRMEDImmediately post-treatment (same day)The other study outcomes are related to participant-reported feasibility of the AFFRMED. Participants will also be asked to rate the feasibility of the AFFRMED using the validated Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Scale scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.
Participant-Reported Acceptability of AFFRMEDImmediately post-treatment (same day)The other study outcomes are related to participant-reported acceptability of the AFFRMED. Participants will also be asked to rate the acceptability of the AFFRMED using the validated Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Scale scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Participant-Reported Appropriateness of AFFRMEDImmediately post-treatment (same day)The other study outcomes are related to participant-reported appropriateness of the AFFRMED. Participants will also be asked to rate the appropriateness of the AFFRMED using the validated Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Scale scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transgender Youth and Young Adults
Transgender youth and young adults will navigate the decision-aid consisting of domains related to human reproduction, fertility, and fertility preservation. The domains address priority learning objectives in each domain to increase knowledge on the impact of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility and fertility preservation options.
10
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young Adults
Parents of transgender youth and young adults will navigate the decision-aid consisting of domains related to human reproduction, fertility, and fertility preservation. The domains address priority learning objectives in each domain to increase knowledge on the impact of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility and fertility preservation options.
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsTotalTransgender Youth and Young Adults
Age, Continuous45.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.83
30.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.711
15.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.779
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants14 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Fertility-related Knowledge

The primary study outcome is change in fertility-related knowledge from same-day pre-AFFRMED to post-AFFRMED exposure. Participants will complete a fertility-related knowledge test instrument immediately prior to AFFRMED exposure. Participants will be given 1 hour to freely navigate the web-based AFFRMED prototype. Thereafter, participants will get a 5-minute break before completing a post-AFFRMED fertility knowledge test. The knowledge test consists of 41 items, and reflects a percentage correct score ranging from 0-100% correct. The Mean Difference results reflect the difference in fertility knowledge test mean scores between pre-AFFRMED and post-AFFRMED exposure.

Time frame: Pre-treatment and immediately post-treatment (same day)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Fertility-related KnowledgePre-test Score51.463 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.585
Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Fertility-related KnowledgePost-test Score85.366 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.858
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Fertility-related KnowledgePre-test Score67.073 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.729
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Fertility-related KnowledgePost-test Score93.171 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.998
Comparison: The hypothesis of this analysis was that using the AFFRMED would increase fertility-related knowledge. This paired-samples t-test compares participants' pre- and post-test knowledge scores.p-value: <0.001t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: The hypothesis of this analysis was that using the AFFRMED would increase fertility-related knowledge. This paired-samples t-test compares participants' pre- and post-test knowledge scores.p-value: <0.001t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change in Decisional Self-Efficacy

The secondary study outcome is change in decisional self-efficacy for fertility-related decision-making from same-day pre-AFFRMED to post-AFFRMED exposure using the Decision Self Efficacy Scale. Decision Self Efficacy Scale scores range from 0 \[not at all confident\] to 100 \[very confident\]. A score of 0 indicates 'extremely low self-efficacy' and a score of 100 indicates 'extremely high self-efficacy'. The Mean Difference results reflect the difference in decisional self-efficacy mean scores between pre-AFFRMED and post-AFFRMED exposure.

Time frame: Pre-treatment and immediately post-treatment (same day)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Decisional Self-EfficacyPre-test Score61.364 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.309
Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Decisional Self-EfficacyPost-test Score80.303 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.903
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Decisional Self-EfficacyPre-test Score83.864 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.653
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsChange in Decisional Self-EfficacyPost-test Score92.929 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.739
Comparison: The hypothesis of this analysis was that using the AFFRMED would increase fertility-related decision self-efficacy. This paired-samples t-test compares participants' pre- and post-test decision self-efficacy scores.p-value: 0.002t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: The hypothesis of this analysis was that using the AFFRMED would increase fertility-related decision self-efficacy. This paired-samples t-test compares participants' pre- and post-test decision self-efficacy scores.p-value: 0.051t-test, 1 sided
Other Pre-specified

Participant-Reported Acceptability of AFFRMED

The other study outcomes are related to participant-reported acceptability of the AFFRMED. Participants will also be asked to rate the acceptability of the AFFRMED using the validated Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Scale scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

Time frame: Immediately post-treatment (same day)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transgender Youth and Young AdultsParticipant-Reported Acceptability of AFFRMED16.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.244
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsParticipant-Reported Acceptability of AFFRMED18.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.853
Other Pre-specified

Participant-Reported Appropriateness of AFFRMED

The other study outcomes are related to participant-reported appropriateness of the AFFRMED. Participants will also be asked to rate the appropriateness of the AFFRMED using the validated Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Scale scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness.

Time frame: Immediately post-treatment (same day)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transgender Youth and Young AdultsParticipant-Reported Appropriateness of AFFRMED17.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.917
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsParticipant-Reported Appropriateness of AFFRMED18.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.011
Other Pre-specified

Participant-Reported Feasibility of AFFRMED

The other study outcomes are related to participant-reported feasibility of the AFFRMED. Participants will also be asked to rate the feasibility of the AFFRMED using the validated Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Scale scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.

Time frame: Immediately post-treatment (same day)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transgender Youth and Young AdultsParticipant-Reported Feasibility of AFFRMED17.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.308
Parents of Transgender Youth and Young AdultsParticipant-Reported Feasibility of AFFRMED18.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.366

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026