Skip to content

Novel Self-Adhesive Composite Hybrid Versus Conventional Composite in Restoration of Carious Primary Teeth.

Novel Self-Adhesive Composite Hybrid Versus Conventional Composite in Restoration of Carious Primary Teeth. A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05173753
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-12-30
Start date
2022-08-31
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2022-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries in Children

Brief summary

The clinical trial aim to evaluate clinical effectiveness of self-adhesive composite hybrid (Surefil one) versus conventional composite(VOCO Grandio) as restorative material for carious primary teeth.

Detailed description

Composite resin is a continuous improving material as its full fill many requirements seeking in dental restorative materials, but is the new introducing composite resin material is always better than the previous one? This randomized clinical trial is performed to discus and assess that hypothesis. A total of 120 class I restoration(60 Surefil one novel self-adhesive composite hybrid & 60 VOCO Grandio conventional composite resin) will be placed in posterior teeth of 60 volunteers(splint mouth design) following the manufacturer instruction. age between 4-7 years. The restorations will then be evaluate clinically at baseline, 3, and 6 month intervene. Both the procedure and follow up will done in the out-patient clinic, Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Interventions

OTHERNovel self-adhesive hybrid composite(Surefil one)

Surefil one, is a recent introduced esthetic dental restoration for treatment of carious teeth.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

for both the intervention group and control group, the procedure and follow up will be done parallel to each other(same time).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Children: Good general health and medically free patients. Age ranges: from 4-7 years old. A provided informed consent by the parents. Acceptable child cooperation. Teeth: Class I carious primary teeth. 2 contralateral or adjacent carious teeth. Simple caries, extending to the dentin. No singe or symptom of pulp inflammation. Normal radiographic examination.

Exclusion criteria

Children: Unable to attend follow-up visits. Refusal of participation. Teeth: Symptom tooth. Periapical Pathosis. Mobile primary tooth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical effectiveness6 month interveneThe two materials will be evaluated using the FDI World Federation criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The cost effectiveness6 month intervenewill be measured using the ICER (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio)
Duration of procedure6 month intervenemeasure using stop watch
Child cooperation6 month interveneWright Modification of Frankl behavior scale will be use(Rating1-5 as R1 definitely negative, and R5 definitely positive).

Contacts

Primary Contactfatima E Rabie, BDS
fatima.rabie@dentistry.cu.edu.eg1019685330
Backup ContactPassant Nagi, PHD
passant.nagi@dentistry.cu.edu.eg1280557107

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026