Skip to content

ALLIANCE: Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve

Safety and Effectiveness of Balloon-Expandable Bioprosthetic SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05172960
Enrollment
1234
Registered
2021-12-29
Start date
2022-06-20
Completion date
2037-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Stenosis, Severe

Keywords

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), SAPIEN X4/X4S

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN X4/X4S Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) in subjects with symptomatic, severe, calcific aortic stenosis (AS).

Detailed description

This is a prospective, single arm, multicenter study. Subjects with bicuspid aortic valve morphology will be enrolled in a separate registry.

Interventions

Implantation of the SAPIEN X4 valve

DEVICESAPIEN X4S

Implantation of the SAPIEN X4S valve

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Severe, calcific AS 2. Native aortic annulus size suitable for SAPIEN X4 THV 3. NYHA functional class ≥ II 4. The subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Anatomical characteristics that would preclude safe femoral placement of the introducer sheath or safe passage of the delivery system 2. Aortic valve is unicuspid, bicuspid or non-calcified 3. Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position 4. Severe aortic regurgitation (\> 3+) 5. Severe mitral regurgitation (\> 3+) or ≥ moderate mitral stenosis 6. Need for mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve intervention within the next 12 months 7. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 20% 8. Cardiac imaging evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation 9. Left ventricular outflow tract calcification that would increase the risk of annular rupture or significant PVL after THV implantation 10. Increased risk of coronary artery obstruction after THV implantation 11. Myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the study procedure 12. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with subvalvular obstruction 13. Subjects with planned concomitant ablation for atrial fibrillation 14. Complex coronary artery disease (CAD) that cannot be optimally treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 15. Any surgical or transcatheter procedure within 30 days prior to the study procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of CAD). Implantation of a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is not considered an exclusion. 16. Any planned surgical or transcatheter intervention to be performed within 30 days following the study procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of CAD) 17. Endocarditis within 180 days prior to the study procedure 18. Stroke, transient ischemic attack or neurological signs and symptoms attributed to carotid or vertebrobasilar disease within 90 days prior to the study procedure 19. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support within 30 days prior to the study procedure 20. Renal insufficiency and/or renal replacement therapy 21. Leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia 22. Inability to tolerate or condition precluding treatment with antithrombotic therapy 23. Hypercoagulable state or other condition that increases risk of thrombosis 24. Absolute contraindications or allergy to iodinated contrast that cannot be adequately treated with premedication 25. Subject refuses blood products 26. BMI \> 50 kg/m2 27. Estimated life expectancy \< 24 months 28. Female who is pregnant or lactating 29. Active SARS-CoV-2 infection or previously diagnosed with COVID-19 with sequelae that could confound endpoint assessments 30. Participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint 31. Subject considered to be part of a vulnerable population

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-hierarchical composite of death and stroke1 yearThe number of patients that died or had a stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Favorable outcome per VARC-3: Composite of 1) alive, 2) Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score ≥ 60, and 3) KCCQ score decrease ≤10 points from baseline1 yearThe number of patients that met all of these criteria. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. An overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Paravalvular leak30 daysParavalvular leak will be categorized as None, Trace, Mild, Mild-Moderate, Moderate, Moderate-Severe, or Severe
New permanent pacemaker implantation30 daysThe number of patients with this event

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States

Contacts

CONTACTEdwards THV Clinical Affairs
THV_CT.gov@Edwards.com949-250-2500
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTamim M. Nazif, MD

Columbia University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRahul P. Sharma, MBBS

Stanford University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026