Skip to content

Autologous Patch Healing vs. Secondary Intention Healing After Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Autologous Patch Healing vs. Secondary Intention Healing After Mohs Micrographic Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05170035
Enrollment
26
Registered
2021-12-27
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2024-02-29
Last updated
2023-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basal Cell Carcinoma, Skin Cancer

Keywords

Skin Cancer, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Mohs micrographic surgery, MMS, Autologous patch, Secondary intention healing

Brief summary

The primary objects of this study is to explore the potential effect of the autologous patch to optimize wound healing after skin cancer surgery with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in the face in a randomized controlled trial comparing autologous patch healing versus secondary intention healing.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMMS + Autologous patch

A patch of consisting of platelets, leucocytes and fibrin, formed by the patients own blood sample.

PROCEDUREMMS and secondary intention healing

Mohs micrographic surgery (standard of care) (wounds will heal by secondary intention healing)

Sponsors

Benzon Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Bispebjerg Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinded photo assesment of wound healing by two independent trained clinical doctors.

Intervention model description

A randomized controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects undergoing MMS for biopsy verified primary nodular basal cell carcinoma in the face, head and neck area on a location suitable for secondary intention healing and thus may also be suitable for autologous patch healing 2. Presenting relevant medical record report at study initiation 3. Written informed consent obtained from subject 4. Understanding of investigation procedures and willingness to abide to all procedures during the course of the investigation.

Exclusion criteria

1. A subjects with major systemic disease not yet stabilized 2. Significant history or current evidence of a medical, psychological or other disorder that, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude enrollment into the study. 3. Pregnant or breast feeding 4. Unable to follow the outlined study protocol 5. Participation in other studies at the same time that may affect the wound healing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blinded assesment of wound healing at day 18-20.Day 18-20Two indenpendent trained clinical doctors will evaluate clinical photos. Wounds will be evaluated fully epithelialized yes/no.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blinded assesment of wound healing at day 11-13day 11-13Clinical photos from day 11-13 will be evaluated. Wounds will be evaluated 50% fully epithelialized yes/no.
TEWL measurementday 11-13 and day 18-20Trans epidermal water loss (TEWL) will be meassured at day 11-13 and day 18-20. The TEWL will be meassured on the wound healing site and the contralateral site of the patient's face as a control.
Scar evaluation using the patient-observer-scar-assesment-scale (POSAS) at 6 months follow-up.6 monthsThe POSAS observer scores scar components with regards to: Vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, surface area, relief and pliability. The collected sum of scores will range from minimum 6 points to maximum 60 points.
Difference in microbiology between intervention wounds and control wounds.day 1 and day 11-13Swab test for microbiome analysis will be conducted at day 1 and day 11-13.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactKatrine E Karmisholt, MD, PhD
katrine.elisabeth.karmisholt@regionh.dk+4561664351
Backup ContactAnna A Harager, Bsc
Anna.ahm.harager@regionh.dk+4531333953

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026