Trauma Injury
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of using deliberate practice - goal-oriented training in the presence of a coach who can provide personalized, immediate feedback - to increase engagement. The research design involves recruitment of a national convenience sample of board-certified emergency physicians who will serve as trainees (n=30), pairing of the trainees with a coach, delivery of three 30-minute coaching sessions using the existing games as the training task, and assessment of the effect of the combined intervention on performance in the laboratory. The specific aims are: 1. To assess the fidelity of intervention delivery by measuring coaching skill acquisition, coaching skill drift and protocol adherence. 2. To assess the potential effect size of the intervention by comparing trainee performance on a validated virtual simulation with a control group of physicians (n=30). 3. To assess the acceptability of the intervention by using a mixture of validated instruments and semi-structured debriefing interviews with trainees to assess their engagement with the intervention.
Detailed description
Deliberate practice - goal-oriented training in the presence of a coach who can provide personalized, immediate feedback - has successfully improved performance across multiple domains, including sports, music, and combat. When used in conjunction with simulation to improve surgical skill, it has a large effect on educational outcomes. It has characteristics that make its application in this context potentially powerful (e.g. personalized feedback/relationship with coach increase engagement) but also potentially challenging (e.g. the diagnostic process does not lend itself easily to assessment). The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of using deliberate practice to amplify the effect of a video game intervention. The team will recruit a national sample of board-certified emergency physicians (n=30) to serve as trainees, with members of the team (n=3) serving as coaches. Trainee-coach dyads will meet for 30 minutes/week for 3 weeks, by video-conferencing, to play one of the existing video games and to use it to practice pattern recognition. Aims are: 1. To assess the fidelity of intervention delivery. Approach: the team will standardize coaching skill during an 'on-boarding session,' measure skill drift over the course of training sessions, and measure protocol adherence (primary outcome). Hypothesis: \>90% of dyads will complete three training sessions. 2. To assess the potential effect size of the intervention. Approach: the team will compare performance of trainees (n=30) with a control group of physicians (n=30) on a validated virtual simulation. Hypothesis: Trainees will make ≥25% fewer diagnostic errors than control physicians (large effect size). 3. To assess the acceptability of the intervention. Approach: the team will conduct semi-structured debriefing interviews with trainees, assessing elements of the intervention that promote engagement. This proposal will inform a future Stage III trial to compare the effect of different interventions on diagnostic error in trauma triage. If successful, this program of research will have an impact on patients by reducing the burden imposed by injury and by addressing the refractory problem of diagnostic error. It is novel conceptually in its effort to make heuristics a source of power, methodologically in its use of deliberate practice to improve diagnosis, and translationally in its use of video game technology. It is feasible because the investigative team has clinical and behavioral science expertise, experience developing deliberate practice interventions, and a track record of successfully building video games that can transform physician behavior. It responds to two national research priorities: 1) improving the diagnostic process; 2) maintaining health and independent living among the aging.
Interventions
As above
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Allocation to treatment v. control group will be masked to the person doing the analysis until the data is locked.
Intervention model description
two arm randomized trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Board certified physicians who work at non-trauma centers in the United States
Exclusion criteria
Physicians without board certification (i.e., residents). Physicians who work only at trauma centers in the US.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | 3 week intervention period | A summary of the number of trainees who signed up for coaching sessions and completed all three sessions as assigned. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Under-triage | 3 weeks post-intervention (deliberate practice) or 3 weeks post-enrollment (control) | Proportion of severely injured patients NOT transferred to trauma centers/total number of severely injured patients evaluated during a validated virtual simulation |
| Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | 2- weeks post intervention | Derived from semi-structured interviews conducted by members of the investigative team at the conclusion of the 3 week training period. These interviews will focus on participant perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A single email invitation was sent to 633 physicians who had previously participated in research (with valid contact information), asking them to forward the invitation to two colleagues. 78 responses were received. Five were excluded because they lived outside the contiguous 48 US States (e.g., in Canada or Puerto Rico) and one was excluded for refusing to consent to videotaping.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Deliberate Practice Trainees will be paired with a coach, and will meet, once per week for thirty minutes, over a three week period. During the training session, coach-trainee dyads will play a puzzle video game, and will discuss contextual cues that should inform triage decisions. At the completion of the three weeks, trainees will complete a semi-structured, debriefing interview and a virtual simulation to assess triage performance.
Deliberate practice: As above | 36 |
| Control Participants in the control group will complete a virtual simulation. | 36 |
| Total | 72 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Conflicts with time | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Consent | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 15 |
| Overall Study | Time slots were full | 3 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | Total | Deliberate Practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 35 Participants | 70 Participants | 35 Participants |
| ATLS Certification | 33 Participants | 64 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 33 Participants | 68 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 7 Participants | 17 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 25 Participants | 51 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Midwest | 5 Participants | 9 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Northeast | 9 Participants | 19 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Southeast | 9 Participants | 19 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States Southwest | 5 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States West | 8 Participants | 17 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 15 Participants | 28 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 21 Participants | 44 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Specialty Emergency Medicine | 30 Participants | 59 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Specialty Family Practice | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Specialty Internal Medicine | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Specialty Other (e.g. general surgery) | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 36 | 0 / 36 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 36 | 0 / 36 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 36 | 0 / 36 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.
A summary of the number of trainees who signed up for coaching sessions and completed all three sessions as assigned.
Time frame: 3 week intervention period
Population: Board-certified emergency physicians who triage and treat adult patients in the emergency department of either a non-trauma center or a Level III/IV trauma center in the United States.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deliberate Practice | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Completed 3 coaching sessions | 28 Participants |
| Deliberate Practice | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Completed 2 coaching sessions | 2 Participants |
| Deliberate Practice | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Completed 1 coaching session | 0 Participants |
| Deliberate Practice | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Not assigned to coaching sessions | 6 Participants |
| Control | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Not assigned to coaching sessions | 36 Participants |
| Control | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Completed 3 coaching sessions | 0 Participants |
| Control | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Completed 1 coaching session | 0 Participants |
| Control | Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions. | Completed 2 coaching sessions | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.
Derived from semi-structured interviews conducted by members of the investigative team at the conclusion of the 3 week training period. These interviews will focus on participant perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention.
Time frame: 2- weeks post intervention
Population: Participants assigned to receive the deliberate practice intervention who completed an interview after the training sessions.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deliberate Practice | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants who received the intervention and did not describe it as acceptable. | 2 Participants |
| Deliberate Practice | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants who did not receive the intervention | 6 Participants |
| Deliberate Practice | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants received the intervention and who described it acceptable | 26 Participants |
| Deliberate Practice | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants who received the intervention but did not complete an interview | 2 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants who did not receive the intervention | 36 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants who received the intervention and did not describe it as acceptable. | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants who received the intervention but did not complete an interview | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable. | Participants received the intervention and who described it acceptable | 0 Participants |
Under-triage
Proportion of severely injured patients NOT transferred to trauma centers/total number of severely injured patients evaluated during a validated virtual simulation
Time frame: 3 weeks post-intervention (deliberate practice) or 3 weeks post-enrollment (control)
Population: Physicians who used the virtual simulation. We excluded physicians enrolled in the trial but who did not provide outcome data for analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deliberate Practice | Under-triage | 0.85 proportion of patients under-triaged | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Control | Under-triage | 0.51 proportion of patients under-triaged | Standard Deviation 0.5 |