Skip to content

Developing a Deliberate Practice Intervention to Recalibrate Physician Heuristics in Trauma Triage

Developing a Deliberate Practice Intervention to Recalibrate Physician Heuristics in Trauma Triage

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05168579
Enrollment
72
Registered
2021-12-23
Start date
2021-12-15
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2023-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trauma Injury

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of using deliberate practice - goal-oriented training in the presence of a coach who can provide personalized, immediate feedback - to increase engagement. The research design involves recruitment of a national convenience sample of board-certified emergency physicians who will serve as trainees (n=30), pairing of the trainees with a coach, delivery of three 30-minute coaching sessions using the existing games as the training task, and assessment of the effect of the combined intervention on performance in the laboratory. The specific aims are: 1. To assess the fidelity of intervention delivery by measuring coaching skill acquisition, coaching skill drift and protocol adherence. 2. To assess the potential effect size of the intervention by comparing trainee performance on a validated virtual simulation with a control group of physicians (n=30). 3. To assess the acceptability of the intervention by using a mixture of validated instruments and semi-structured debriefing interviews with trainees to assess their engagement with the intervention.

Detailed description

Deliberate practice - goal-oriented training in the presence of a coach who can provide personalized, immediate feedback - has successfully improved performance across multiple domains, including sports, music, and combat. When used in conjunction with simulation to improve surgical skill, it has a large effect on educational outcomes. It has characteristics that make its application in this context potentially powerful (e.g. personalized feedback/relationship with coach increase engagement) but also potentially challenging (e.g. the diagnostic process does not lend itself easily to assessment). The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of using deliberate practice to amplify the effect of a video game intervention. The team will recruit a national sample of board-certified emergency physicians (n=30) to serve as trainees, with members of the team (n=3) serving as coaches. Trainee-coach dyads will meet for 30 minutes/week for 3 weeks, by video-conferencing, to play one of the existing video games and to use it to practice pattern recognition. Aims are: 1. To assess the fidelity of intervention delivery. Approach: the team will standardize coaching skill during an 'on-boarding session,' measure skill drift over the course of training sessions, and measure protocol adherence (primary outcome). Hypothesis: \>90% of dyads will complete three training sessions. 2. To assess the potential effect size of the intervention. Approach: the team will compare performance of trainees (n=30) with a control group of physicians (n=30) on a validated virtual simulation. Hypothesis: Trainees will make ≥25% fewer diagnostic errors than control physicians (large effect size). 3. To assess the acceptability of the intervention. Approach: the team will conduct semi-structured debriefing interviews with trainees, assessing elements of the intervention that promote engagement. This proposal will inform a future Stage III trial to compare the effect of different interventions on diagnostic error in trauma triage. If successful, this program of research will have an impact on patients by reducing the burden imposed by injury and by addressing the refractory problem of diagnostic error. It is novel conceptually in its effort to make heuristics a source of power, methodologically in its use of deliberate practice to improve diagnosis, and translationally in its use of video game technology. It is feasible because the investigative team has clinical and behavioral science expertise, experience developing deliberate practice interventions, and a track record of successfully building video games that can transform physician behavior. It responds to two national research priorities: 1) improving the diagnostic process; 2) maintaining health and independent living among the aging.

Interventions

As above

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Allocation to treatment v. control group will be masked to the person doing the analysis until the data is locked.

Intervention model description

two arm randomized trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Board certified physicians who work at non-trauma centers in the United States

Exclusion criteria

Physicians without board certification (i.e., residents). Physicians who work only at trauma centers in the US.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.3 week intervention periodA summary of the number of trainees who signed up for coaching sessions and completed all three sessions as assigned.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Under-triage3 weeks post-intervention (deliberate practice) or 3 weeks post-enrollment (control)Proportion of severely injured patients NOT transferred to trauma centers/total number of severely injured patients evaluated during a validated virtual simulation
Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.2- weeks post interventionDerived from semi-structured interviews conducted by members of the investigative team at the conclusion of the 3 week training period. These interviews will focus on participant perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A single email invitation was sent to 633 physicians who had previously participated in research (with valid contact information), asking them to forward the invitation to two colleagues. 78 responses were received. Five were excluded because they lived outside the contiguous 48 US States (e.g., in Canada or Puerto Rico) and one was excluded for refusing to consent to videotaping.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Deliberate Practice
Trainees will be paired with a coach, and will meet, once per week for thirty minutes, over a three week period. During the training session, coach-trainee dyads will play a puzzle video game, and will discuss contextual cues that should inform triage decisions. At the completion of the three weeks, trainees will complete a semi-structured, debriefing interview and a virtual simulation to assess triage performance. Deliberate practice: As above
36
Control
Participants in the control group will complete a virtual simulation.
36
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyConflicts with time20
Overall StudyLack of Consent10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up015
Overall StudyTime slots were full30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalDeliberate Practice
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
35 Participants70 Participants35 Participants
ATLS Certification33 Participants64 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants68 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants17 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants51 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Midwest
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Northeast
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Southeast
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Southwest
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
West
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants28 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants44 Participants23 Participants
Specialty
Emergency Medicine
30 Participants59 Participants29 Participants
Specialty
Family Practice
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Specialty
Internal Medicine
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Specialty
Other (e.g. general surgery)
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 360 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 360 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 360 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.

A summary of the number of trainees who signed up for coaching sessions and completed all three sessions as assigned.

Time frame: 3 week intervention period

Population: Board-certified emergency physicians who triage and treat adult patients in the emergency department of either a non-trauma center or a Level III/IV trauma center in the United States.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Deliberate PracticePercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Completed 3 coaching sessions28 Participants
Deliberate PracticePercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Completed 2 coaching sessions2 Participants
Deliberate PracticePercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Completed 1 coaching session0 Participants
Deliberate PracticePercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Not assigned to coaching sessions6 Participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Not assigned to coaching sessions36 Participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Completed 3 coaching sessions0 Participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Completed 1 coaching session0 Participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Who Signed up for the Intervention That Completed All 3 Coaching Sessions.Completed 2 coaching sessions0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.

Derived from semi-structured interviews conducted by members of the investigative team at the conclusion of the 3 week training period. These interviews will focus on participant perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention.

Time frame: 2- weeks post intervention

Population: Participants assigned to receive the deliberate practice intervention who completed an interview after the training sessions.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Deliberate PracticeNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants who received the intervention and did not describe it as acceptable.2 Participants
Deliberate PracticeNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants who did not receive the intervention6 Participants
Deliberate PracticeNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants received the intervention and who described it acceptable26 Participants
Deliberate PracticeNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants who received the intervention but did not complete an interview2 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants who did not receive the intervention36 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants who received the intervention and did not describe it as acceptable.0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants who received the intervention but did not complete an interview0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Describe Coaching as Acceptable.Participants received the intervention and who described it acceptable0 Participants
Secondary

Under-triage

Proportion of severely injured patients NOT transferred to trauma centers/total number of severely injured patients evaluated during a validated virtual simulation

Time frame: 3 weeks post-intervention (deliberate practice) or 3 weeks post-enrollment (control)

Population: Physicians who used the virtual simulation. We excluded physicians enrolled in the trial but who did not provide outcome data for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Deliberate PracticeUnder-triage0.85 proportion of patients under-triagedStandard Deviation 0.36
ControlUnder-triage0.51 proportion of patients under-triagedStandard Deviation 0.5
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.76, 69.6]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026