Skip to content

Domiciliary Nasal High Flow and Patient Outcomes in Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure in the United Kingdom

Does Domiciliary Nasal High Flow (NHF) Therapy Improve Patient Outcomes in Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure (CHRF) in the United Kingdom (UK): A Pre and Post Interventional Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05167201
Enrollment
54
Registered
2021-12-22
Start date
2022-03-28
Completion date
2024-01-26
Last updated
2023-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS), Nasal High Flow, Health-related Quality of Life

Brief summary

Chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) in the context of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) is associated with increased mortality. The availability and effectiveness of domiciliary Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment (when indicated) is key as this treatment can improve quality of life and reduce health-care costs from associated burden of disease. The emerging obesity epidemic means that there is now increased home mechanical ventilation set-ups in patients with obesity related respiratory failure (ORRF), yet there are no alternative treatments for patients struggling with domiciliary NIV. Domiciliary NHF has been shown to improve health related quality of life in stable CHRF in patients with COPD and improve cost effectiveness yet there are no current studies looking at the use of domiciliary NHF and its outcomes in ORRF. The study aims to deliver a pre and post intervention study evaluating patient reported and clinical outcomes in patients using NHF over twelve weeks, who have either COPD or OHS and have been unable to use domiciliary NIV. The study wishes to address key outcomes such as quality of life, clinical effectiveness, compliance and acceptability with the use of domiciliary NHF in both of these patient populations.

Detailed description

This study is an investigator-initiated, unblinded, multi-centre, one arm pre and post interventional study evaluating the use of nasal high flow over twelve weeks, upon self-reported quality of life in adults aged 18 and above, with COPD or OHS and CHRF. This is not a comparator trial and will provide preliminary information on the intervention in a group of individuals who cannot comply with current guideline recommended therapy (with all strategies used to address any barriers to current treatment usage). This study will therefore aim to evaluate if this treatment offers effective outcomes in this difficult to treat population thus reflecting the variations in practice and choices that occur for this group of individuals in real practice. Ethical approval will be obtained from the research ethical committee of Brighton and Sussex. Informed consent will be obtained from all willing participants.

Interventions

High flow nasal cannula (NHF) is a device that delivers warmed and humid air through a high air flow rate, through the nose. It is used as a non-invasive ventilatory approach, which is relatively comfortable, in the management of respiratory failure and has been investigated in several studies evaluating the outcomes as domiciliary treatment in patients with COPD.

Sponsors

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Royal Free Charity
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single arm pre and post intervention study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. All patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who meet these criteria for domiciliary NIV: \- Diagnosis of COPD based on spirometry; The ration of the forced expiratory volume in the first one second (FEV1) to the forced vital capacity (FVC) of the lungs (FEV1/FVC ratio), of ⩽ 0.70 And either of: * i) Recent inpatient admission with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with persistent hypercapnia (pH ≥ 7.35 and PaCO2 ≥ 6 kilopascal (kPa)) 2-4 weeks after the acute episode or * ii) COPD with evidence nocturnal hypoventilation (sleep study demonstrating time under 90% saturations for 30% of the sleep time) or * iii) Stable CHRF (paO2 ⩽ 8 kPa and paCO2 ≥ 6 kPa) OR 2. All patients with OHS who meet these criteria for domiciliary NIV i) Diagnosis of OHS based on Body Mass Index \> 30 kg/m2, daytime hypercapnia (PaCO2 ≥ 6kPa) and significant nocturnal hypoventilation (saturations ⩽ 90% for 30% of the total sleep time) or ii) Inpatient admission with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring NIV referred for consideration of domiciliary treatment who have been offered treatment with NIV and have: 3\) * discontinued or demonstrated poor compliance with domiciliary NIV (defined as ⩽ 4 hours usage for 70% of the nights at 4 months with all reasonable measures taken to address barriers to treatment use) * evidence of sleep disordered breathing on a sleep study * over or equal to 18 years of age * able to provide informed consent * able to participate for the duration of the study * have an expected survival for greater than three months All patients must meet inclusion criteria for 1 or 2 and all of 3

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable psychiatric disease * Unable to return for review appointments e.g due to move home or lives a long distance from the study site * Pregnancy * Receiving home NIV treatment at time of inclusion to study * Receiving home NIV treatment for other medical illnesses, for example neuromuscular disease * Unable to read English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) measured by the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI)Twelve weeksSRI is a validated tool to assess HRQOL in patients with chronic respiratory failure receiving home mechanical ventilation, and has been shown to be applicable to different respiratory diseases. It consists of eight subscales measuring different aspects of health status with lower scores (0 to 100) indicating poorer health or higher disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Excessive Daytime Sleepiness measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)Twelve weeksThe ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions and respondents are asked to rate, on a 4 point scale (0-3), their usual chances of dosing off or falling asleep. The ESS score can range from 0 to 24 and the higher the score, the higher that person's average sleep propensity in daily life or their 'daytime sleepiness'. The aim is to compare this from baseline to the end of the study.
Mean overnight arterial oxygenation (PaO2)Twelve weeksThe aim to is to evaluate the efficacy of NHF regarding overnight arterial oxygenation and all participants will have overnight oximetry performed twice on nasal high flow during the study, which will be compared to their baseline off treatment.
Mean overnight transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring (PaCO2)Twelve weeksThe aim is to evaluate the efficacy of NHF regarding overnight arterial carbon dioxide monitoring and all participants will have overnight carbon dioxide monitoring performed twice on nasal high flow during the study which will be compared to their baseline off treatment.
Self-reported breathlessness measured by the Modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale (MBD scale)Twelve weeksThe Modified Borg Dyspnoea scale measures the perceived rate of difficulty of breathing on a 0 to 10 rated numerical score, which can be used during submaximal exercise in addition. A higher score indicates higher perceived breathlessness and the aim is to compare this from baseline to the end of the study.
Tolerability of Nasal High FlowTwelve weeksAssessing tolerability of nasal high flow use.
Acceptability of Nasal High FlowTwelve weeksAssessing the overall experience of using nasal high flow at home.
Health Care Utilisation QuestionnaireTwelve weeksWe will collect health resource usage by a health utilisation questionnaire based on the 10 core items of Standardised Resource Use Measure to capture core items of health resource use. from hospital admissions, to general practice and community settings, as well as home visits and medications. This will allow us to present simple cost consequence data of nasal high flow and to review how it compares from baseline to the end of the study.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026