Skip to content

Cost-effective Analysis of Two Approximation Devices in Closure of Gastrointestinal Defects

Cost-effective Analysis of Two Approximation Devices in Closure of Gastrointestinal Defects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05163665
Enrollment
82
Registered
2021-12-20
Start date
2022-08-23
Completion date
2023-09-11
Last updated
2024-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Keywords

Closure of GI defects

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized research trial that aims to evaluate the clinical results of two different approximation methods to close the tissue defect caused by removing gastrointestinal polyps.

Detailed description

Closure of GI defects after endoscopic resection decreases the rate of post resection bleeding. Traditionally, standard TTS clips have been used to close GI wall defects with some success. However, complete apposition of the resection wall edges occurs only 68% of the time. Endoscopic suturing with the traditional Overstitch device can achieve complete closure in almost 100% of defects. However, this device is costly, requires the use of a double channel therapeutic endoscope, and at times can be difficult to maneuver. Recently, a novel FDA approved TTS tissue helix and suture device (X-tack) was developed to overcome the challenges of the traditional Overstitch device. Animal models have demonstrated the X-tack system is superior to TTS in effecting large mucosal defects and maintain similar durability. At BCM, we have been using the X-tack system routinely in closure of GI defects.

Interventions

PROCEDUREClosure type

Patients will have their endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as per standard-of-care. Afterwards, patient will receive one of two intervention options for the closure of the GI defect following polyp removal.

Sponsors

Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is greater than or equal to 18 years of age. * Patient can provide informed consent. * Patient is referred for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric, small bowel, or colorectal lesion. * Post resection defect \> 3cm. * Lesion 2cm or greater from the dentate line.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is \< 18 years of age. * Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent. * Patient is pregnant. * Patient is currently incarcerated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of each closureDay 1Total cost amount for equipment used in closure of GI defect

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of complete closure of GI defectDay 1 (end of procedure)Complete closure achieved by assigned closure type as assessed by performing physician
Successful Tissue approximationDay 1 (End of procedure)Less than or equal to 15mm of visible resection bed at its widest portion after the device is used for tissue approximation

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026