Skip to content

Validation of Plantar Orthoses for Abnormal Plantar Arch Using a New Non-invasive Clinical Imaging System

Validation of Plantar Orthoses for Abnormal Plantar Arch Using a New Non-invasive Clinical Imaging System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05163418
Enrollment
65
Registered
2021-12-20
Start date
2021-10-08
Completion date
2024-02-02
Last updated
2025-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Flat Feet, High Arched Foot

Brief summary

The goal of this project is to validate a new non-invasive clinical imaging system to evaluate the efficacy of plantar orthotics and to assess the biomechanical efficiency of plantar orthotics for people with flat or high arch feet. The Cryovizion system should detect changes in participants' posture with an accuracy of 95%, while orthotics should improve the body's postural symmetry index.

Interventions

DEVICEFoot orthosis for flat feet

Plantar orthotics based on a unique process of footprinting, software design and orthotic printing to create custom 3D printed orthotics.

DEVICEFoot orthoses for high arches feet

Plantar orthotics based on a unique process of footprinting, software design and orthotic printing to create custom 3D printed orthotics.

Sponsors

Cryos Technologies Inc.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
TOPMED
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* BMI\<30 * No pain * No musculoskeletal disorders * No balance disorders * No pathologies linked to the central nervous system * No use of drugs affecting the balance

Exclusion criteria

* People with foot pathology other than the arch; * People with diabetes ; * People with severe obesity ; * People wearing high heel shoes regularly ; * People with degenerative disease ; * People with neuromuscular pathology ; * People with a circulatory disorder ; * People who have had major lower body surgery; * Inability to walk 30 minutes continuously.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 2 MonthsBaseline and 2 monthsChange in body's postural symmetry index(SSIM gray) at 2 months after the beginning of the intervention. This index is calculated from the full body image based on the Cryovision topographic color imaging system. Index values can range from -1 to 1. 0 indicates no symmetry, 1 indicates perfect symmetry and -1 indicates perfect anti-symmetry.
Change From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsChange in body's postural symmetry index(SSIM gray) at 6 months after the beginning of the intervention. This index is calculated from the full body image based on the Cryovision topographic color imaging system. Index values can range from -1 to 1. 0 indicates no symmetry, 1 indicates perfect symmetry and -1 indicates perfect anti-symmetry.
Change From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 12 MonthsBaseline and 12 monthsChange in body's postural symmetry index(SSIM gray) at 12 months after the beginning of the intervention. This index is calculated from the full body image based on the Cryovision topographic color imaging system. Index values can range from -1 to 1. 0 indicates no symmetry, 1 indicates perfect symmetry and -1 indicates perfect anti-symmetry.
Change From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 MonthsChange between directly after 2 months of intervention and baseline valuesChange from baseline in absolute asymmetry values of flexion/extension angle of lower body joints during gait at 2 months. The reported values are means of the absolute value of left side flexion/extension joint angle minus right side flexion/extension joint angle. Value=abs(Left joint angle - Right joint angle ). Joint angle values were calculated according to International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) recommandations. Values are reported for hip, knee and ankle asymmetry for gait with shoes but without foot orthotics.
Change From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 MonthsChange between directly after 6 months of intervention and baseline valuesChange from baseline in absolute asymmetry values of flexion/extension angle of lower body joints during gait at 6 months. The reported values are means of the absolute value of left side flexion/extension joint angle minus right side flexion/extension joint angle. Value=abs(Left joint angle - Right joint angle ). Joint angle values were calculated according to International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) recommandations. Values are reported for hip, knee and ankle asymmetry for gait with shoes but without foot orthotics.
Change From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 MonthsChange between directly after 12 months of intervention and baseline valuesChange from baseline in absolute asymmetry values of flexion/extension angle of lower body joints during gait at 12 months. The reported values are means of the absolute value of left side flexion/extension joint angle minus right side flexion/extension joint angle. Value=abs(Left joint angle - Right joint angle ). Joint angle values were calculated according to International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) recommandations. Values are reported for hip, knee and ankle asymmetry for gait with shoes but without foot orthotics.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Flat Feet
People with flat feet according to foot posture index (validated by clinical assessment) Foot orthoses for high arches feet: Plantar orthotics based on a unique process of footprinting, software design and orthotic printing to create custom 3D printed orthotics.
34
High Arches Feet
People with high arches feet according to foot posture index (validated by clinical assessment) Foot orthosis for flat feet: Plantar orthotics based on a unique process of footprinting, software design and orthotic printing to create custom 3D printed orthotics.
11
Normal Arches Feet (Control Group)
Control group. This group only completed the baseline visit, therefore no data is reported for the change from baseline outcome measures.
20
Total65

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFlat FeetHigh Arches FeetNormal Arches Feet (Control Group)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
34 Participants11 Participants20 Participants65 Participants
Asymetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthothics
Ankle asymmetry
2.72 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43
4.41 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.06
3.77 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.11
3.34 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46
Asymetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthothics
Hip asymmetry
1.84 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
1.90 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.16
1.95 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
1.89 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
Asymetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthothics
Knee asymmetry
2.97 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27
3.14 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.76
3.09 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62
3.04 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47
Body's postural symmetry index0.348 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.037
0.411 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.046
0.358 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.039
0.361 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.039
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
34 Participants11 Participants20 Participants65 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
34 participants11 participants20 participants65 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants7 Participants13 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants4 Participants7 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 340 / 110 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 344 / 110 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 110 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 Months

Change from baseline in absolute asymmetry values of flexion/extension angle of lower body joints during gait at 12 months. The reported values are means of the absolute value of left side flexion/extension joint angle minus right side flexion/extension joint angle. Value=abs(Left joint angle - Right joint angle ). Joint angle values were calculated according to International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) recommandations. Values are reported for hip, knee and ankle asymmetry for gait with shoes but without foot orthotics.

Time frame: Change between directly after 12 months of intervention and baseline values

Population: Participants who completed the overall study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 MonthsHip asymmetry-0.02 degreesStandard Deviation 1.1
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 MonthsKnee asymmetry0.10 degreesStandard Deviation 0.94
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 MonthsAnkle asymmetry-0.14 degreesStandard Deviation 1.16
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 MonthsHip asymmetry0.28 degreesStandard Deviation 0.6
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 MonthsKnee asymmetry0.47 degreesStandard Deviation 1.05
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 12 MonthsAnkle asymmetry0.92 degreesStandard Deviation 1.87
Primary

Change From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 Months

Change from baseline in absolute asymmetry values of flexion/extension angle of lower body joints during gait at 2 months. The reported values are means of the absolute value of left side flexion/extension joint angle minus right side flexion/extension joint angle. Value=abs(Left joint angle - Right joint angle ). Joint angle values were calculated according to International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) recommandations. Values are reported for hip, knee and ankle asymmetry for gait with shoes but without foot orthotics.

Time frame: Change between directly after 2 months of intervention and baseline values

Population: Participants who completed the overall study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 MonthsHip asymmetry0.04 degreesStandard Deviation 0.97
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 MonthsKnee asymmetry0.14 degreesStandard Deviation 1.67
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 MonthsAnkle asymmetry0.20 degreesStandard Deviation 1.72
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 MonthsHip asymmetry0.41 degreesStandard Deviation 0.33
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 MonthsKnee asymmetry0.33 degreesStandard Deviation 0.81
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 2 MonthsAnkle asymmetry0.28 degreesStandard Deviation 1.85
Primary

Change From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 Months

Change from baseline in absolute asymmetry values of flexion/extension angle of lower body joints during gait at 6 months. The reported values are means of the absolute value of left side flexion/extension joint angle minus right side flexion/extension joint angle. Value=abs(Left joint angle - Right joint angle ). Joint angle values were calculated according to International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) recommandations. Values are reported for hip, knee and ankle asymmetry for gait with shoes but without foot orthotics.

Time frame: Change between directly after 6 months of intervention and baseline values

Population: Participants who completed the overall study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 MonthsHip asymmetry0.09 degreesStandard Deviation 0.91
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 MonthsKnee asymmetry0.27 degreesStandard Deviation 1.68
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 MonthsAnkle asymmetry0.79 degreesStandard Deviation 1.81
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 MonthsHip asymmetry0.43 degreesStandard Deviation 0.51
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 MonthsKnee asymmetry0.37 degreesStandard Deviation 1.59
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Asymmetry of Flexion/Extension Angle of Lower Body Joints During Gait Without Foot Orthotics at 6 MonthsAnkle asymmetry0.18 degreesStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Change From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 12 Months

Change in body's postural symmetry index(SSIM gray) at 12 months after the beginning of the intervention. This index is calculated from the full body image based on the Cryovision topographic color imaging system. Index values can range from -1 to 1. 0 indicates no symmetry, 1 indicates perfect symmetry and -1 indicates perfect anti-symmetry.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: The normal arches control group only completed the baseline visit, therefore change from baseline outcome measures are not reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 12 Months0.041 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.079
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 12 Months0.006 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.057
Primary

Change From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 2 Months

Change in body's postural symmetry index(SSIM gray) at 2 months after the beginning of the intervention. This index is calculated from the full body image based on the Cryovision topographic color imaging system. Index values can range from -1 to 1. 0 indicates no symmetry, 1 indicates perfect symmetry and -1 indicates perfect anti-symmetry.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 months

Population: The normal arches control group only completed the baseline visit, therefore change from baseline outcome measures are not reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 2 Months-0.031 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.054
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 2 Months0.010 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.061
Primary

Change From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 6 Months

Change in body's postural symmetry index(SSIM gray) at 6 months after the beginning of the intervention. This index is calculated from the full body image based on the Cryovision topographic color imaging system. Index values can range from -1 to 1. 0 indicates no symmetry, 1 indicates perfect symmetry and -1 indicates perfect anti-symmetry.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: The normal arches control group only completed the baseline visit, therefore change from baseline outcome measures are not reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Flat FeetChange From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 6 Months0.020 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
Experimental: High Arches FeetChange From Baseline in Body's Postural Symmetry Index(SSIM Gray) at 6 Months-0.016 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.076

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026