Skip to content

CENtral Blood Pressure Targeting: A Pragmatic RAndomized Pilot triaL in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

CENtral Blood Pressure Targeting: A Pragmatic RAndomized Pilot triaL in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05163158
Acronym
CENTRAL-CKD
Enrollment
116
Registered
2021-12-20
Start date
2022-05-24
Completion date
2025-07-30
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Diseases, Hypertension

Keywords

Central blood pressure, Central hypertension, Chronic kidney disease, Hypertension, Arterial stiffness

Brief summary

Background: Emerging data favors aortic blood pressure (BP) over brachial cuff BP in predicting CV and renal complications, as this BP directly impacts the heart, brain and kidneys. In parallel, central BP measuring devices have been developed that are more accurate towards aortic BP and easy to use without training. In no other condition than advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is BP control as important, since undertreatment is associated with adverse CV events and progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), while overtreatment similarly leads to adverse CV events and injurious falls but also acute kidney injury which can precipitate ESKD. To this day, standard BP management relies on brachial cuff BP, which is an imprecise surrogate marker of aortic BP, more so in the advanced CKD population. Considering that these patients have a high risk of CV morbidity and mortality and is a group where brachial BP may be the least reliable, it can be beneficial to manage hypertension in this population using central BP measurements. With the development of affordable and easy to use central BP devices, routine use of central BP in hypertension would now become a reality. However, the superiority of central BP to traditional brachial cuff BP in regard to clinical outcomes will first need to be demonstrated. Objectives: To demonstrate that targeting central BP in advanced CKD patients as opposed to brachial cuff BP is feasible and results in lower arterial stiffness after 12 months of follow-up. Methods: The CENTRAL-CKD trial is an investigator-initiated prospective parallel-group 1:1 randomized double-blinded multicenter pragmatic pilot trial. Patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 (n=116) will be randomized to either a central systolic BP target \< 130 mmHg (intervention) or brachial systolic BP target \< 130 mmHg (standard care). Central and brachial BP will be concomitantly measured, with treating physicians, patients and investigators blinded towards allocation. As this trial is of a pragmatic design, all other aspects of BP and CKD management, including anti-hypertensive treatment-related decisions, diastolic BP targets, and clinical and laboratory follow-ups will be at the discretion of the attending Nephrologist. The primary outcomes include feasibility of large-scale trial using prespecified criteria and aortic stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) at 12 months. Other cardiovascular, renal, quality of life and safety outcomes will be evaluated. Importance: CENTRAL-CKD is designed as a pilot trial aimed at providing the framework and justification to proceed to a large-scale trial with adequate power to detect the impact of the proposed intervention on clinically important outcomes.

Interventions

OTHERCentral vs brachial systolic blood pressure targeting

Participants will be randomized to either a central BP target (intervention) or a brachial BP target (standard care). For each group, the source of the BP (central or brachial) will be blinded and only the BP values will be provided to the attending Nephrologist. In both cases, the target SBP will be \<130 mmHg.

Sponsors

Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Over 18 years of age; 2. eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2 as determined by the CKD-EPI equation (within 30 days of screening); 3. Office brachial cuff systolic blood pressure between 120 and 160 mmHg (using automated office blood pressure).

Exclusion criteria

1. Already taking 5 or more anti-hypertensive medications (any class) 2. Unwillingness to change anti-hypertensive medication by the attending Nephrologist or patient 3. Recent acute kidney injury (\>50% increase in serum creatinine in preceding 30 days) 4. Previous kidney replacement therapy (kidney transplant, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) 5. Recent myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure (in preceding 30 days) 6. Recent injurious fall requiring hospitalisation (in preceding 30 days) 7. Concomitant major illness / comorbidity that may result in death in the next 6 months 8. Participation in another study that is likely to affect BP levels 9. Inability to provide consent due to cognitive impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility: Consent rateBaselineProportion of participants who provide consent relative to the number approached for participation. Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<30% / 30-60% / \>60%
Feasibility: Recruitment rateBaselineProportion of randomized participants relative to the number of screened participants. Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<40% / 40-80% / \>80%
Feasibility: Achieved BP target rate12 monthsProportion of randomized participants who achieve BP target at 12 months Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<30% / 30-60% / \>60%
Feasibility: Completion rate12 monthsProportion of randomized participants who complete the trial Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<40% / 40-80% / \>80%
Feasibility: Recruitment pace12 months after activation of last siteNumber of participants recruited after 24 months of activation for all sites Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<54 / 54-81 / \>81
Feasibility: Divergent treatment decision rate12 monthsProportion of divergent treatment decision based on central BP compared to brachial BP Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<10% / 10-30% / \>30%
Feasibility: Therapeutic inertia rate12 monthsProportion of therapeutic inertia Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \>60% / 60-30% / \<30%
Difference in aortic stiffness12 monthsCarotid-femoral pulse wave velocity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in eGFR decline12 months
Change in albuminuria12 months
Difference in Daily Defined Doses of blood pressure drugs12 months
Quality of life (KDQOL-SF questionnaire)12 monthsScore 0 to 100. Higher score represents better quality of life

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRemi Goupil, MD MSc

Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026