Skip to content

Michigan Genetic Hereditary Testing (MiGHT)

Methods for Increasing Genetic Testing Uptake in Michigan

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05162846
Acronym
MiGHT
Enrollment
793
Registered
2021-12-17
Start date
2022-04-21
Completion date
2025-11-21
Last updated
2026-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, History of Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Genetic testing, Genetic susceptibility to malignant neoplasm

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare three interventions, two experimental and one standard of care (usual care), to see if the experimental interventions will increase the likelihood of a participant obtaining guideline-concordant genetic testing. Eligible participants will be randomized (assigned) to one of the following interventions: 1) Virtual genetics navigator, a mobile-optimized website, designed by the investigators, that delivers tailored messages and content; 2) two motivational interviewing (MI) telephone calls delivered by trained genetics health coaches; or 3) usual care.

Detailed description

This trial will be conducted in partnership with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) and a network of oncology practices in Michigan, the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC). As of April 2023 we were approved by our IRB to expand our inclusion criteria and recruitment cohort. This expansion will enhance our reach to individuals who are not in the acute stages of clinical care as well as individuals who are not in oncology care currently yet still qualify for genetic testing based on their family history of cancer alone or in combination with any personal cancer history. These expansions will also support the unburdening of oncology practices - who continue to face downstream, resource-limiting affects from the COVID-19 pandemic - across the state. The goal and aims of the study remain the same.

Interventions

OTHERPublicly available genetic testing resources

Participants may view the publicly available Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) website as they wish.

BEHAVIORALVirtual genetics navigator

A mobile-optimized website/online genetic tool developed by investigators from the University of Michigan's Center for Health Communications Research (CHCR).

BEHAVIORALMotivational interviewing (MI)

At least 2 phone calls delivered by trained genetic health coaches using motivational interviewing and providing genetic testing information.

Sponsors

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Able to speak and read English * Access to the internet * Completed the Family Health History Tool (FHHT) * Meeting clinical criteria for genetic evaluation due to any of the below: 1. Personal history of Breast cancer either: * i. Diagnosed under 50 * ii. Personal or family history of triple negative breast cancer * iii. Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry * iv. Male proband * v. 1st or 2nd degree relative with ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer diagnosed under 50, or male breast cancer 2. Personal history of prostate cancer either: * i. Diagnosed under 50 * ii. Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry * iii. 1st or 2nd degree relative with ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer diagnosed under 50, or male breast cancer 3. Personal history of any cancer or no personal history of cancer with either: * i. PREMM score ≥ 2.5% * ii. 1st degree relative with pancreatic, or male breast cancer * iii. 1st or 2nd degree relative with ovarian cancer * iv. 1st degree relative with any of these cancers diagnosed under 50: colon, endometrial, or breast * v. Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry and 1st or 2nd degree relative with breast cancer 4. Personal history of endometrial cancer diagnosed under 50 5. Personal history of colorectal cancer diagnosed under 50 6. Personal history of renal cancer diagnosed under 46 7. Personal history of sarcoma diagnosed under 46 and a 1st or 2nd degree relative with sarcoma, breast cancer, or brain cancer diagnosed under 56 8. Personal history of brain cancer diagnosed under 46 and a 1st or 2nd degree relative with sarcoma, breast cancer, or brain cancer diagnosed under 56 9. Personal history of any two of the following cancers with at least one of them diagnosed under 46: breast, sarcoma, or brain 10. Personal history of ovarian cancer 11. Personal history of pancreatic cancer 12. Personal history of adrenal cortical carcinoma

Exclusion criteria

* Prior clinical germline genetic testing for cancer or already have an upcoming appointment scheduled with a genetics provider

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Complete Clinical Genetic Testing at Six Months After Randomization6 months after enrollment/randomizationThe primary outcome is completion of genetic testing (yes/no) at 6 months after randomization by patient self-report.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motivators of Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Completed Genetic Testing6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomizationParticipants who have completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 5-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific motivators for future testing. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all; 5=extremely). The mean score for each question, across all participants who completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the motivators in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific motivator.
Barriers to Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Completed Genetic Testing6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomizationParticipants who have completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 7-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific barriers that were identified in a previous, observational study. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all; 5=extremely). The mean score for each question, across all participants who completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the barriers in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific barrier.
Barriers to Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Did Not Yet Complete Genetic Testing6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomizationParticipants who have not yet completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 23-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific barriers that were identified in a previous, observational study. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all, 5=strongly agree). The mean score for each question, across all participants who have not yet completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the barriers in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific barrier.
Motivators of Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Did Not Yet Complete Genetic Testing6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomizationParticipants who have not yet completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 5-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific motivators for future testing. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all, 5=strongly agree). The mean score for each question, across all participants who have not yet completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the motivators in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific motivator.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORElena Stoffel, MD, MPH

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous62 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
241 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
71 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
665 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
793 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
165 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
98 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Other
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2670 / 2650 / 261
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2670 / 2650 / 261
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2670 / 2650 / 261

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 19, 2026