Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Conditions
Keywords
Toll-like Receptor 7, Toll-like Receptor 8, WILLOW, Adults, SLE, CLE, Lupus, Discoid lupus erythematosus, Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, M5049, Enpatoran
Brief summary
The purpose of this Proof of Concept (PoC) and Dose-finding (DF) basket study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Enpatoran over 24 weeks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE; subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus \[SCLE\] and/or discoid lupus erythematosus \[DLE\]) participants in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, adaptive and dose-ranging setting. Study Duration: 33 weeks Visit Frequency: every 2 or 4 weeks Enpatoran is not available through an expanded access program.
Interventions
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a low dose orally, twice daily (BID) up to 24 weeks.
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a medium dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a high dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.
Participants will receive placebo matched to Enpatoran up to 24 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Active CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) with a CLE disease area and activity index (CLASI-A) \>= 8 * Active SLE with presence of: CLASI-A \>= 8 and BILAG 2004 1B, C, D (that is \[i.e.\], No BILAG 2004 A and No BILAG 2004 \>= 2B) or BILAG 2004 \>= 1A or 2B and 1 or 2 of the following: Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI \>= 6 at Screening Visit and confirmed clinical hybrid SELENA-SLEDAI \>= 4 (excluding laboratory parameters) at Day 1 Visit and/or CLASI-A \>= 8 * Receiving a stable dose of at least one of the following standards of care therapies for lupus: Immunomodulator/immunosuppressant, oral corticosteroids, and/or topical corticosteroids * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Exclusion criteria
* Autoimmune or rheumatic disease other than SLE or CLE * Dermatological diseases other than cutaneous manifestations of SLE or CLE * Uncontrolled medical conditions including significant cardiovascular events, active lupus nephritis, and active neurological disorder * Ongoing or active clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection * History of uncontrolled seizures or other neurological disorder * History of or positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B virus * History of malignancy * Other protocol defined
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16 | Baseline, week 16 | The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) was a validated instrument used to assess disease activity (CLASI-A) and damage in lupus erythematosus. The activity scale included erythema, scale/hypertrophy, active alopecia, recent hair loss, and mucous membrane disease, while the damage scale measured dyspigmentation, atrophy, and scarring. CLASI-A scores ranged from 0 to 70, with mild, moderate, and severe disease corresponding to scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70, respectively. Erythema and scale/hypertrophy sub-scores were computed across 13 body areas, with maximum scores of 39 and 26, respectively. The remaining 5 points reflected contributions from active alopecia (0-3), recent hair loss (0-1), and mucous membrane involvement (0-1), completing the total CLASI-A activity score. Directionality reflected worsening with higher scores and improvement with lower scores. |
| Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24 | At Week 24 | BILAG-based BICLA response is defined as participants meeting all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all organ systems with moderate or severe disease activity-i.e., all grade A scores (severe disease requiring high-dose therapy) must improve to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity); all grade B scores (moderate disease requiring moderate therapy) must improve to C or D; 2. No new BILAG A scores and no more than one new BILAG B score; 3. No worsening in total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; 4. No significant deterioration (≤10%) in physician's global assessment; and 5. No treatment failure, defined as initiation of non-protocol therapy. Directionality is toward clinical improvement and disease stabilization. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks) | 12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical importance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically important increases in QTCF findings were reported. |
| Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24 | The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). |
| Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24 | The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The score reflects the clinician's integrated judgment based on clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory findings, and patient-reported outcomes. PGA is used to quantify disease severity and monitor treatment response over time. Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity. |
| Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | At week 24 (BICLA Response) and Day 1 upto Week 24 (CS Reductions) | BICLA (BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment) defines response as improvement in all baseline BILAG A scores to B, C, or D and all B scores to C or D, with no new A scores and no more than one new B score. Responders must also show no worsening in SLEDAI-2K or Physician's Global Assessment (defined as ≥0.3-point increase). Corticosteroid (CS) reduction is defined as a decrease in daily prednisone-equivalent dose from ≥10 mg at Day 1 to ≤5 mg by Week 12, sustained through Week 24. BILAG grades reflect disease severity: A = severe disease requiring high-dose therapy; B = moderate disease requiring moderate therapy; C = mild stable disease; D = no current activity. |
| Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | Day 1 up to Week 24 | CS reduction is defined as the reduction of daily prednisone-equivalent dose from \>= 10 mg at Day 1 to \<= 5 mg by the Week 12 visit and sustained through Week 24. The number of participants with Clinically Meaningful CS Reduction were reported. |
| Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | At Week 16 and Week 24 | The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The number of participants with CLA-IGA score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 were reported. |
| Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24 | At Week 24 | SRI-4 response was defined as \>= 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). |
| Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 | At Week 24 | Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 is defined as meeting all of the following criteria at the specified time point: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems, no new disease activity compared to the previous assessment, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≤1, current prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day, and standard maintenance dosing of immunosuppressive therapies. The number of participants with LLDAS Attainment at Week 24 were reported. |
| Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed. |
| Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 | At Week 24 | The 28-joint count questionnaire assesses 14 joints on each side (28 joints overall) for both tenderness and swelling. The outcome for the assessment of each joint can be absent, present, replaced or unable to evaluate.Tender 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are tender. Swollen 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are swollen. The number of tender and swollen joints will be calculated as the count of joints which are both tender and swollen. Percentage of Participants with 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 was reported. |
| Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare | Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24 | Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of moderate or severe disease activity, as measured by the BILAG Index. The BILAG Index assesses clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) across 9 organ systems. Each organ system is scored alphabetically: A (severe disease), B (moderate disease), C (mild stable disease), D (inactive but previously active), and E (inactive and never affected). A moderate/severe flare is defined as the presence of at least one new or worsening BILAG A score (severe disease activity) or two or more new or worsening BILAG B scores (moderate disease activity) in any organ system, compared to the previous visit. Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare | Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24 | Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of a severe flare, as measured by the SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI). A severe flare is characterized by a ≥12-point increase in the SLEDAI score from the previous visit, accompanied by a ≥2.5-point increase in the physician's global assessment (on a 0-3 visual analogue scale), and a change in treatment such as initiation of corticosteroids at a dose \>0.5 mg/kg/day and/or the addition of a new immunosuppressive agent. Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | Baseline and at week 24 | The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The symptoms domain includes items measuring physical sensations such as itching, burning, stinging, and pain. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. |
| Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | Baseline and at Week 24 | The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The functioning domain assesses the impact of skin disease on daily activities, social interactions, and work. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never to 5 = all the time) and transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores reflect greater impairment in functioning. |
| Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | Baseline and at Week 24 | The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The emotion domain of the Skindex-29+3 assesses the psychological impact of skin disease in individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It includes items that measure feelings such as embarrassment, frustration, anger, sadness, and worry related to skin symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress. |
| Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | Baseline and at Week 24 | The Skindex-29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations. It includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific to lupus. Subscale scores are generated for the 3 original domains: symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms or lower functioning. The lupus-specific domain captures symptoms and concerns unique to cutaneous lupus, including sensitivity to sunlight, flares from environmental exposure, and emotional impact of lupus-related skin changes. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater symptom burden and disease impact. |
| Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | Baseline and at Week 24 | Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item, self-reported questionnaire designed to assess fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functioning in individuals with chronic illness, including systemic lupus erythematosus. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 4 = very much. Items are scored to ensure that 0 represents the worst and 4 the best possible outcome. The score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning. |
| Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24 | At Week 24 | Remission attainment was defined as a Clinical Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score of 0, Physician's Global Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus \<0.5 (0-3 scale), daily prednisolone-equivalent dose ≤5 mg, and stable use of immunosuppressive therapies including biologics. Number of participants who attained remission was reported. |
| Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks) | Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, Urinalysis, Renal Toxicity and Hepatotoxicity. Number of Participants with Abnormal laboratory parameters (severity of grade greater or equal to 3) were reported. Severity of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Colombia, Greece, Israel, Japan, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo Participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) (active subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus \[SCLE\] and/or discoid lupus erythematosus \[DLE\]) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with predominantly active lupus rash (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index \[CLASI-A\] greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks. | 26 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A \>= 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive 25 milligrams (mg) of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks. | 23 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A \>= 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive 50 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks. | 25 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A \>= 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive 100 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks. | 26 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group \[BILAG A/2B\]) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks during Part 1 and Part 2. | 94 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or SLEDAI \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive 25 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks. | 71 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or SLEDAI \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive 50 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks. | 74 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or SLEDAI \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive 100mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks during Part 1 and Part 2. | 114 |
| Total | 453 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Non-Compliance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 | 47 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 | 45 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 | 42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 | 42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 | 39 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 | 44 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 10 Participants | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 47 Participants | 37 Participants | 37 Participants | 51 Participants | 213 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 16 Participants | 14 Participants | 14 Participants | 15 Participants | 47 Participants | 34 Participants | 37 Participants | 63 Participants | 240 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 27 Participants | 22 Participants | 18 Participants | 28 Participants | 107 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 26 Participants | 16 Participants | 20 Participants | 27 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 14 Participants | 35 Participants | 24 Participants | 29 Participants | 51 Participants | 187 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 22 Participants | 17 Participants | 19 Participants | 19 Participants | 87 Participants | 69 Participants | 69 Participants | 110 Participants | 412 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 41 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 26 | 0 / 24 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 95 | 0 / 71 | 0 / 74 | 0 / 114 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 8 / 26 | 4 / 24 | 6 / 26 | 13 / 26 | 29 / 95 | 17 / 71 | 24 / 74 | 33 / 114 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 26 | 2 / 24 | 0 / 26 | 1 / 26 | 3 / 95 | 1 / 71 | 3 / 74 | 5 / 114 |
Outcome results
Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16
The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) was a validated instrument used to assess disease activity (CLASI-A) and damage in lupus erythematosus. The activity scale included erythema, scale/hypertrophy, active alopecia, recent hair loss, and mucous membrane disease, while the damage scale measured dyspigmentation, atrophy, and scarring. CLASI-A scores ranged from 0 to 70, with mild, moderate, and severe disease corresponding to scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70, respectively. Erythema and scale/hypertrophy sub-scores were computed across 13 body areas, with maximum scores of 39 and 26, respectively. The remaining 5 points reflected contributions from active alopecia (0-3), recent hair loss (0-1), and mucous membrane involvement (0-1), completing the total CLASI-A activity score. Directionality reflected worsening with higher scores and improvement with lower scores.
Time frame: Baseline, week 16
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure,
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16 | -5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.94 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16 | -9.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16 | -10.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.77 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16 | -9.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.84 |
Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24
BILAG-based BICLA response is defined as participants meeting all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all organ systems with moderate or severe disease activity-i.e., all grade A scores (severe disease requiring high-dose therapy) must improve to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity); all grade B scores (moderate disease requiring moderate therapy) must improve to C or D; 2. No new BILAG A scores and no more than one new BILAG B score; 3. No worsening in total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; 4. No significant deterioration (≤10%) in physician's global assessment; and 5. No treatment failure, defined as initiation of non-protocol therapy. Directionality is toward clinical improvement and disease stabilization.
Time frame: At Week 24
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24 | 37 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24 | 41 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24 | 36 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24 | 56 Participants |
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item, self-reported questionnaire designed to assess fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functioning in individuals with chronic illness, including systemic lupus erythematosus. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 4 = very much. Items are scored to ensure that 0 represents the worst and 4 the best possible outcome. The score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 3.0 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 2.0 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 6.9 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 4.3 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 2.4 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 4.8 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 3.6 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24 | 5.1 scores on a scale |
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24
The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The symptoms domain includes items measuring physical sensations such as itching, burning, stinging, and pain. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and at week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -13.7 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -27.3 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -28.6 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -21.9 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -9.2 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -17.5 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -15.2 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 | -17.0 scores on a scale |
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24
The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The emotion domain of the Skindex-29+3 assesses the psychological impact of skin disease in individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It includes items that measure feelings such as embarrassment, frustration, anger, sadness, and worry related to skin symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress.
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -15.8 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -23.1 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -21.2 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -23.2 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -15.3 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -18.0 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -16.9 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24 | -16.3 scores on a scale |
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24
The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The functioning domain assesses the impact of skin disease on daily activities, social interactions, and work. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never to 5 = all the time) and transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores reflect greater impairment in functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -12.2 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -17.9 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -20.3 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -15.1 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -11.1 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -14.2 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -11.3 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24 | -15.4 scores on a scale |
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24
The Skindex-29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations. It includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific to lupus. Subscale scores are generated for the 3 original domains: symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms or lower functioning. The lupus-specific domain captures symptoms and concerns unique to cutaneous lupus, including sensitivity to sunlight, flares from environmental exposure, and emotional impact of lupus-related skin changes. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater symptom burden and disease impact.
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -15.5 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -19.9 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -21.1 scores on a scale |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -11.0 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -16.4 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -10.9 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -13.1 scores on a scale |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24 | -14.5 scores on a scale |
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, Urinalysis, Renal Toxicity and Hepatotoxicity. Number of Participants with Abnormal laboratory parameters (severity of grade greater or equal to 3) were reported. Severity of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.
Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters | 0 Participants |
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical importance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically important increases in QTCF findings were reported.
Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) | 0 Participants |
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction
CS reduction is defined as the reduction of daily prednisone-equivalent dose from \>= 10 mg at Day 1 to \<= 5 mg by the Week 12 visit and sustained through Week 24. The number of participants with Clinically Meaningful CS Reduction were reported.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 6 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 12 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 9 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 36 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 28 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 27 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 41 Participants |
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.
Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 12 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 15 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 15 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 21 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 61 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 42 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 47 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | TEAEs | 70 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | Serious TEAEs | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest | AESI | 3 Participants |
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24
The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.714 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 3.179 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 2.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Baseline | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The score reflects the clinician's integrated judgment based on clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory findings, and patient-reported outcomes. PGA is used to quantify disease severity and monitor treatment response over time. Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -23.9 millimeter | Standard Deviation 25.45 |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 61.4 millimeter | Standard Deviation 14.08 |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -25.3 millimeter | Standard Deviation 20.55 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -44.0 millimeter | Standard Deviation 21.97 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 61.8 millimeter | Standard Deviation 15.37 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -42.5 millimeter | Standard Deviation 23.67 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 56.3 millimeter | Standard Deviation 19.42 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -35.2 millimeter | Standard Deviation 25.7 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -41.2 millimeter | Standard Deviation 25.12 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 61.7 millimeter | Standard Deviation 18.04 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -49.1 millimeter | Standard Deviation 22.44 |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -42.0 millimeter | Standard Deviation 22.94 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -21.3 millimeter | Standard Deviation 18.35 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -16.7 millimeter | Standard Deviation 20.01 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 55.7 millimeter | Standard Deviation 17.08 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -33.0 millimeter | Standard Deviation 19.68 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -26.1 millimeter | Standard Deviation 17.62 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 56.1 millimeter | Standard Deviation 15.65 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -34.8 millimeter | Standard Deviation 20.06 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 56.7 millimeter | Standard Deviation 14.85 |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -30.7 millimeter | Standard Deviation 22.78 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 16 | -36.0 millimeter | Standard Deviation 22.08 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Baseline | 57.4 millimeter | Standard Deviation 17.42 |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24 | Week 24 | -39.1 millimeter | Standard Deviation 23.16 |
Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24
The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The number of participants with CLA-IGA score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 were reported.
Time frame: At Week 16 and Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | 11 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | 12 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 16 | 12 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 | Week 24 | 14 Participants |
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction
BICLA (BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment) defines response as improvement in all baseline BILAG A scores to B, C, or D and all B scores to C or D, with no new A scores and no more than one new B score. Responders must also show no worsening in SLEDAI-2K or Physician's Global Assessment (defined as ≥0.3-point increase). Corticosteroid (CS) reduction is defined as a decrease in daily prednisone-equivalent dose from ≥10 mg at Day 1 to ≤5 mg by Week 12, sustained through Week 24. BILAG grades reflect disease severity: A = severe disease requiring high-dose therapy; B = moderate disease requiring moderate therapy; C = mild stable disease; D = no current activity.
Time frame: At week 24 (BICLA Response) and Day 1 upto Week 24 (CS Reductions)
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 16 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 20 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 20 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction | 28 Participants |
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24
Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 is defined as meeting all of the following criteria at the specified time point: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems, no new disease activity compared to the previous assessment, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≤1, current prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day, and standard maintenance dosing of immunosuppressive therapies. The number of participants with LLDAS Attainment at Week 24 were reported.
Time frame: At Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 | 23 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 | 21 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 | 32 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 | 35 Participants |
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24
Remission attainment was defined as a Clinical Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score of 0, Physician's Global Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus \<0.5 (0-3 scale), daily prednisolone-equivalent dose ≤5 mg, and stable use of immunosuppressive therapies including biologics. Number of participants who attained remission was reported.
Time frame: At Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24 | 20 Participants |
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24
SRI-4 response was defined as \>= 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Time frame: At Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24 | 50 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24 | 44 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24 | 48 Participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24 | 77 Participants |
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24
The 28-joint count questionnaire assesses 14 joints on each side (28 joints overall) for both tenderness and swelling. The outcome for the assessment of each joint can be absent, present, replaced or unable to evaluate.Tender 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are tender. Swollen 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are swollen. The number of tender and swollen joints will be calculated as the count of joints which are both tender and swollen. Percentage of Participants with 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 was reported.
Time frame: At Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 | 68.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 | 77.6 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 | 79.1 percentage of participants |
Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare
Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of moderate or severe disease activity, as measured by the BILAG Index. The BILAG Index assesses clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) across 9 organ systems. Each organ system is scored alphabetically: A (severe disease), B (moderate disease), C (mild stable disease), D (inactive but previously active), and E (inactive and never affected). A moderate/severe flare is defined as the presence of at least one new or worsening BILAG A score (severe disease activity) or two or more new or worsening BILAG B scores (moderate disease activity) in any organ system, compared to the previous visit. Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare | NA days |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare | NA days |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare | NA days |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare | NA days |
Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare
Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of a severe flare, as measured by the SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI). A severe flare is characterized by a ≥12-point increase in the SLEDAI score from the previous visit, accompanied by a ≥2.5-point increase in the physician's global assessment (on a 0-3 visual analogue scale), and a change in treatment such as initiation of corticosteroids at a dose \>0.5 mg/kg/day and/or the addition of a new immunosuppressive agent. Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24
Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare | NA days |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg | Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare | NA days |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg | Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare | NA days |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg | Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare | NA days |