Skip to content

The WILLOW Study With M5049 in SLE and CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) (WILLOW)

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging, Parallel and Adaptive Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enpatoran in SLE and in CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) Participants Receiving Standard of Care (WILLOW)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05162586
Enrollment
456
Registered
2021-12-17
Start date
2022-03-31
Completion date
2024-11-20
Last updated
2025-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

Toll-like Receptor 7, Toll-like Receptor 8, WILLOW, Adults, SLE, CLE, Lupus, Discoid lupus erythematosus, Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, M5049, Enpatoran

Brief summary

The purpose of this Proof of Concept (PoC) and Dose-finding (DF) basket study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Enpatoran over 24 weeks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE; subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus \[SCLE\] and/or discoid lupus erythematosus \[DLE\]) participants in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, adaptive and dose-ranging setting. Study Duration: 33 weeks Visit Frequency: every 2 or 4 weeks Enpatoran is not available through an expanded access program.

Interventions

Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a low dose orally, twice daily (BID) up to 24 weeks.

DRUGEnpatoran medium dose

Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a medium dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.

Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a high dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive placebo matched to Enpatoran up to 24 weeks.

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) with a CLE disease area and activity index (CLASI-A) \>= 8 * Active SLE with presence of: CLASI-A \>= 8 and BILAG 2004 1B, C, D (that is \[i.e.\], No BILAG 2004 A and No BILAG 2004 \>= 2B) or BILAG 2004 \>= 1A or 2B and 1 or 2 of the following: Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI \>= 6 at Screening Visit and confirmed clinical hybrid SELENA-SLEDAI \>= 4 (excluding laboratory parameters) at Day 1 Visit and/or CLASI-A \>= 8 * Receiving a stable dose of at least one of the following standards of care therapies for lupus: Immunomodulator/immunosuppressant, oral corticosteroids, and/or topical corticosteroids * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

* Autoimmune or rheumatic disease other than SLE or CLE * Dermatological diseases other than cutaneous manifestations of SLE or CLE * Uncontrolled medical conditions including significant cardiovascular events, active lupus nephritis, and active neurological disorder * Ongoing or active clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection * History of uncontrolled seizures or other neurological disorder * History of or positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B virus * History of malignancy * Other protocol defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16Baseline, week 16The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) was a validated instrument used to assess disease activity (CLASI-A) and damage in lupus erythematosus. The activity scale included erythema, scale/hypertrophy, active alopecia, recent hair loss, and mucous membrane disease, while the damage scale measured dyspigmentation, atrophy, and scarring. CLASI-A scores ranged from 0 to 70, with mild, moderate, and severe disease corresponding to scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70, respectively. Erythema and scale/hypertrophy sub-scores were computed across 13 body areas, with maximum scores of 39 and 26, respectively. The remaining 5 points reflected contributions from active alopecia (0-3), recent hair loss (0-1), and mucous membrane involvement (0-1), completing the total CLASI-A activity score. Directionality reflected worsening with higher scores and improvement with lower scores.
Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24At Week 24BILAG-based BICLA response is defined as participants meeting all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all organ systems with moderate or severe disease activity-i.e., all grade A scores (severe disease requiring high-dose therapy) must improve to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity); all grade B scores (moderate disease requiring moderate therapy) must improve to C or D; 2. No new BILAG A scores and no more than one new BILAG B score; 3. No worsening in total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; 4. No significant deterioration (≤10%) in physician's global assessment; and 5. No treatment failure, defined as initiation of non-protocol therapy. Directionality is toward clinical improvement and disease stabilization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical importance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically important increases in QTCF findings were reported.
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The score reflects the clinician's integrated judgment based on clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory findings, and patient-reported outcomes. PGA is used to quantify disease severity and monitor treatment response over time. Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity.
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) ReductionAt week 24 (BICLA Response) and Day 1 upto Week 24 (CS Reductions)BICLA (BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment) defines response as improvement in all baseline BILAG A scores to B, C, or D and all B scores to C or D, with no new A scores and no more than one new B score. Responders must also show no worsening in SLEDAI-2K or Physician's Global Assessment (defined as ≥0.3-point increase). Corticosteroid (CS) reduction is defined as a decrease in daily prednisone-equivalent dose from ≥10 mg at Day 1 to ≤5 mg by Week 12, sustained through Week 24. BILAG grades reflect disease severity: A = severe disease requiring high-dose therapy; B = moderate disease requiring moderate therapy; C = mild stable disease; D = no current activity.
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) ReductionDay 1 up to Week 24CS reduction is defined as the reduction of daily prednisone-equivalent dose from \>= 10 mg at Day 1 to \<= 5 mg by the Week 12 visit and sustained through Week 24. The number of participants with Clinically Meaningful CS Reduction were reported.
Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24At Week 16 and Week 24The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The number of participants with CLA-IGA score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 were reported.
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24At Week 24SRI-4 response was defined as \>= 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24At Week 24Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 is defined as meeting all of the following criteria at the specified time point: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems, no new disease activity compared to the previous assessment, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≤1, current prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day, and standard maintenance dosing of immunosuppressive therapies. The number of participants with LLDAS Attainment at Week 24 were reported.
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFrom screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24At Week 24The 28-joint count questionnaire assesses 14 joints on each side (28 joints overall) for both tenderness and swelling. The outcome for the assessment of each joint can be absent, present, replaced or unable to evaluate.Tender 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are tender. Swollen 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are swollen. The number of tender and swollen joints will be calculated as the count of joints which are both tender and swollen. Percentage of Participants with 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 was reported.
Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) FlareBaseline (Day 1) through Week 24Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of moderate or severe disease activity, as measured by the BILAG Index. The BILAG Index assesses clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) across 9 organ systems. Each organ system is scored alphabetically: A (severe disease), B (moderate disease), C (mild stable disease), D (inactive but previously active), and E (inactive and never affected). A moderate/severe flare is defined as the presence of at least one new or worsening BILAG A score (severe disease activity) or two or more new or worsening BILAG B scores (moderate disease activity) in any organ system, compared to the previous visit. Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.
Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe FlareBaseline (Day 1) through Week 24Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of a severe flare, as measured by the SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI). A severe flare is characterized by a ≥12-point increase in the SLEDAI score from the previous visit, accompanied by a ≥2.5-point increase in the physician's global assessment (on a 0-3 visual analogue scale), and a change in treatment such as initiation of corticosteroids at a dose \>0.5 mg/kg/day and/or the addition of a new immunosuppressive agent. Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24Baseline and at week 24The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The symptoms domain includes items measuring physical sensations such as itching, burning, stinging, and pain. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24Baseline and at Week 24The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The functioning domain assesses the impact of skin disease on daily activities, social interactions, and work. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never to 5 = all the time) and transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores reflect greater impairment in functioning.
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24Baseline and at Week 24The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The emotion domain of the Skindex-29+3 assesses the psychological impact of skin disease in individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It includes items that measure feelings such as embarrassment, frustration, anger, sadness, and worry related to skin symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress.
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24Baseline and at Week 24The Skindex-29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations. It includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific to lupus. Subscale scores are generated for the 3 original domains: symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms or lower functioning. The lupus-specific domain captures symptoms and concerns unique to cutaneous lupus, including sensitivity to sunlight, flares from environmental exposure, and emotional impact of lupus-related skin changes. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater symptom burden and disease impact.
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24Baseline and at Week 24Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item, self-reported questionnaire designed to assess fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functioning in individuals with chronic illness, including systemic lupus erythematosus. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 4 = very much. Items are scored to ensure that 0 represents the worst and 4 the best possible outcome. The score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning.
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24At Week 24Remission attainment was defined as a Clinical Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score of 0, Physician's Global Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus \<0.5 (0-3 scale), daily prednisolone-equivalent dose ≤5 mg, and stable use of immunosuppressive therapies including biologics. Number of participants who attained remission was reported.
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory ParametersFrom screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, Urinalysis, Renal Toxicity and Hepatotoxicity. Number of Participants with Abnormal laboratory parameters (severity of grade greater or equal to 3) were reported. Severity of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Colombia, Greece, Israel, Japan, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A: Placebo
Participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) (active subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus \[SCLE\] and/or discoid lupus erythematosus \[DLE\]) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with predominantly active lupus rash (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index \[CLASI-A\] greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks.
26
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mg
Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A \>= 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive 25 milligrams (mg) of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks.
23
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mg
Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A \>= 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive 50 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks.
25
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mg
Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A \>= 8) were enrolled in Cohort A to receive 100 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks.
26
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo
Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group \[BILAG A/2B\]) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks during Part 1 and Part 2.
94
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mg
Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or SLEDAI \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive 25 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks.
71
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mg
Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or SLEDAI \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive 50 mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks.
74
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mg
Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A \>= 8 and/or SLEDAI \>= 6 were enrolled in Cohort B to receive 100mg of Enpatoran twice daily for 24 weeks during Part 1 and Part 2.
114
Total453

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyAdverse Event20124152
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy00001001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00002002
Overall StudyNon-Compliance01001001
Overall StudyOther00001022
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20007622

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgTotal
Age, Continuous49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants9 Participants11 Participants11 Participants47 Participants37 Participants37 Participants51 Participants213 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants14 Participants14 Participants15 Participants47 Participants34 Participants37 Participants63 Participants240 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants27 Participants22 Participants18 Participants28 Participants107 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants26 Participants16 Participants20 Participants27 Participants121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants6 Participants6 Participants3 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants11 Participants12 Participants14 Participants35 Participants24 Participants29 Participants51 Participants187 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants17 Participants19 Participants19 Participants87 Participants69 Participants69 Participants110 Participants412 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants6 Participants6 Participants7 Participants7 Participants2 Participants5 Participants4 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 240 / 260 / 260 / 950 / 710 / 740 / 114
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 264 / 246 / 2613 / 2629 / 9517 / 7124 / 7433 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 262 / 240 / 261 / 263 / 951 / 713 / 745 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16

The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) was a validated instrument used to assess disease activity (CLASI-A) and damage in lupus erythematosus. The activity scale included erythema, scale/hypertrophy, active alopecia, recent hair loss, and mucous membrane disease, while the damage scale measured dyspigmentation, atrophy, and scarring. CLASI-A scores ranged from 0 to 70, with mild, moderate, and severe disease corresponding to scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70, respectively. Erythema and scale/hypertrophy sub-scores were computed across 13 body areas, with maximum scores of 39 and 26, respectively. The remaining 5 points reflected contributions from active alopecia (0-3), recent hair loss (0-1), and mucous membrane involvement (0-1), completing the total CLASI-A activity score. Directionality reflected worsening with higher scores and improvement with lower scores.

Time frame: Baseline, week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure,

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.94
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16-9.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16-10.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.77
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16-9.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.84
Primary

Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24

BILAG-based BICLA response is defined as participants meeting all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all organ systems with moderate or severe disease activity-i.e., all grade A scores (severe disease requiring high-dose therapy) must improve to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity); all grade B scores (moderate disease requiring moderate therapy) must improve to C or D; 2. No new BILAG A scores and no more than one new BILAG B score; 3. No worsening in total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; 4. No significant deterioration (≤10%) in physician's global assessment; and 5. No treatment failure, defined as initiation of non-protocol therapy. Directionality is toward clinical improvement and disease stabilization.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 2437 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 2441 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 2436 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 2456 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item, self-reported questionnaire designed to assess fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functioning in individuals with chronic illness, including systemic lupus erythematosus. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 4 = very much. Items are scored to ensure that 0 represents the worst and 4 the best possible outcome. The score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 243.0 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 242.0 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 246.9 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 244.3 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 242.4 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 244.8 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 243.6 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 245.1 scores on a scale
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24

The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The symptoms domain includes items measuring physical sensations such as itching, burning, stinging, and pain. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and at week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-13.7 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-27.3 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-28.6 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-21.9 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-9.2 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-17.5 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-15.2 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24-17.0 scores on a scale
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24

The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The emotion domain of the Skindex-29+3 assesses the psychological impact of skin disease in individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It includes items that measure feelings such as embarrassment, frustration, anger, sadness, and worry related to skin symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-15.8 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-23.1 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-21.2 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-23.2 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-15.3 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-18.0 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-16.9 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24-16.3 scores on a scale
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24

The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The functioning domain assesses the impact of skin disease on daily activities, social interactions, and work. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never to 5 = all the time) and transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores reflect greater impairment in functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-12.2 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-17.9 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-20.3 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-15.1 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-11.1 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-14.2 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-11.3 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24-15.4 scores on a scale
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24

The Skindex-29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations. It includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific to lupus. Subscale scores are generated for the 3 original domains: symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms or lower functioning. The lupus-specific domain captures symptoms and concerns unique to cutaneous lupus, including sensitivity to sunlight, flares from environmental exposure, and emotional impact of lupus-related skin changes. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater symptom burden and disease impact.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible.Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-15.5 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-19.9 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-21.1 scores on a scale
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-11.0 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-16.4 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-10.9 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-13.1 scores on a scale
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24-14.5 scores on a scale
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters

Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, Urinalysis, Renal Toxicity and Hepatotoxicity. Number of Participants with Abnormal laboratory parameters (severity of grade greater or equal to 3) were reported. Severity of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.

Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters0 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)

12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical importance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically important increases in QTCF findings were reported.

Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)0 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction

CS reduction is defined as the reduction of daily prednisone-equivalent dose from \>= 10 mg at Day 1 to \<= 5 mg by the Week 12 visit and sustained through Week 24. The number of participants with Clinically Meaningful CS Reduction were reported.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction6 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction7 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction12 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction9 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction36 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction28 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction27 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction41 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.

Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs1 Participants
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI0 Participants
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs12 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs15 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs2 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs15 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs0 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs21 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs1 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI2 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs3 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs61 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI3 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI1 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs42 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs1 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs3 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs47 Participants
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI0 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestTEAEs70 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestSerious TEAEs5 Participants
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestAESI3 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24

The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.714
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline3.179 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Baseline2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 16-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24Week 24-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Secondary

Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24

The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The score reflects the clinician's integrated judgment based on clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory findings, and patient-reported outcomes. PGA is used to quantify disease severity and monitor treatment response over time. Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure, while number analyzed refers to those evaluable at specific timepoints. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-23.9 millimeterStandard Deviation 25.45
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline61.4 millimeterStandard Deviation 14.08
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-25.3 millimeterStandard Deviation 20.55
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-44.0 millimeterStandard Deviation 21.97
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline61.8 millimeterStandard Deviation 15.37
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-42.5 millimeterStandard Deviation 23.67
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline56.3 millimeterStandard Deviation 19.42
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-35.2 millimeterStandard Deviation 25.7
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-41.2 millimeterStandard Deviation 25.12
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline61.7 millimeterStandard Deviation 18.04
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-49.1 millimeterStandard Deviation 22.44
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-42.0 millimeterStandard Deviation 22.94
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-21.3 millimeterStandard Deviation 18.35
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-16.7 millimeterStandard Deviation 20.01
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline55.7 millimeterStandard Deviation 17.08
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-33.0 millimeterStandard Deviation 19.68
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-26.1 millimeterStandard Deviation 17.62
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline56.1 millimeterStandard Deviation 15.65
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-34.8 millimeterStandard Deviation 20.06
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline56.7 millimeterStandard Deviation 14.85
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-30.7 millimeterStandard Deviation 22.78
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 16-36.0 millimeterStandard Deviation 22.08
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Baseline57.4 millimeterStandard Deviation 17.42
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24Week 24-39.1 millimeterStandard Deviation 23.16
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24

The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates clear skin and 4 represents severe disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The number of participants with CLA-IGA score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 were reported.

Time frame: At Week 16 and Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 164 Participants
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 247 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 2411 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 1610 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 1610 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 2412 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 1612 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24Week 2414 Participants
Secondary

Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction

BICLA (BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment) defines response as improvement in all baseline BILAG A scores to B, C, or D and all B scores to C or D, with no new A scores and no more than one new B score. Responders must also show no worsening in SLEDAI-2K or Physician's Global Assessment (defined as ≥0.3-point increase). Corticosteroid (CS) reduction is defined as a decrease in daily prednisone-equivalent dose from ≥10 mg at Day 1 to ≤5 mg by Week 12, sustained through Week 24. BILAG grades reflect disease severity: A = severe disease requiring high-dose therapy; B = moderate disease requiring moderate therapy; C = mild stable disease; D = no current activity.

Time frame: At week 24 (BICLA Response) and Day 1 upto Week 24 (CS Reductions)

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction16 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction20 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction20 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction28 Participants
Secondary

Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24

Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 is defined as meeting all of the following criteria at the specified time point: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems, no new disease activity compared to the previous assessment, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≤1, current prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day, and standard maintenance dosing of immunosuppressive therapies. The number of participants with LLDAS Attainment at Week 24 were reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 2423 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 2421 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 2432 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 2435 Participants
Secondary

Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24

Remission attainment was defined as a Clinical Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score of 0, Physician's Global Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus \<0.5 (0-3 scale), daily prednisolone-equivalent dose ≤5 mg, and stable use of immunosuppressive therapies including biologics. Number of participants who attained remission was reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 2410 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 247 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 248 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 2420 Participants
Secondary

Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24

SRI-4 response was defined as \>= 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 2450 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 2444 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 2448 Participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 2477 Participants
Secondary

Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24

The 28-joint count questionnaire assesses 14 joints on each side (28 joints overall) for both tenderness and swelling. The outcome for the assessment of each joint can be absent, present, replaced or unable to evaluate.Tender 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are tender. Swollen 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are swollen. The number of tender and swollen joints will be calculated as the count of joints which are both tender and swollen. Percentage of Participants with 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Overall number of participants analyzed refers to those evaluable for the outcome measure. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 2468.8 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 2472.2 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 2477.6 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 2479.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare

Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of moderate or severe disease activity, as measured by the BILAG Index. The BILAG Index assesses clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) across 9 organ systems. Each organ system is scored alphabetically: A (severe disease), B (moderate disease), C (mild stable disease), D (inactive but previously active), and E (inactive and never affected). A moderate/severe flare is defined as the presence of at least one new or worsening BILAG A score (severe disease activity) or two or more new or worsening BILAG B scores (moderate disease activity) in any organ system, compared to the previous visit. Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) FlareNA days
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) FlareNA days
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) FlareNA days
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) FlareNA days
Secondary

Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare

Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of a severe flare, as measured by the SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI). A severe flare is characterized by a ≥12-point increase in the SLEDAI score from the previous visit, accompanied by a ≥2.5-point increase in the physician's global assessment (on a 0-3 visual analogue scale), and a change in treatment such as initiation of corticosteroids at a dose \>0.5 mg/kg/day and/or the addition of a new immunosuppressive agent. Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized in the cohort to which they were eligible. Participants who were randomized in error were excluded from FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: PlaceboCohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe FlareNA days
Cohort A: Enpatoran 25 mgCohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe FlareNA days
Cohort A: Enpatoran 50 mgCohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe FlareNA days
Cohort A: Enpatoran 100 mgCohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe FlareNA days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026