Skip to content

Replication of the LEAD-2 Diabetes Trial in Healthcare Claims Data

Replication of the LEAD-2 Diabetes Trial in Healthcare Claims Data

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05162183
Enrollment
3474
Registered
2021-12-17
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2021-09-01
Last updated
2023-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Brief summary

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Detailed description

This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the RCT DUPLICATE initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to replicate, as closely as possible in healthcare insurance claims data, the trial listed below/above. Although many features of the trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the trial. Randomization is also not replicable in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates through standard practice. Investigators assume that the RCT provides the reference standard treatment effect estimate and that failure to replicate RCT findings is indicative of the inadequacy of the healthcare claims data for replication for a range of possible reasons and does not provide information on the validity of the original RCT finding.

Interventions

DRUGGlimepiride

Glimepiride dispensing claim is used as the reference group.

DRUGLiraglutide

Liraglutide dispensing claim is used as the exposure group.

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes mellitus \[0,0\] days * 3 or more recorded HbA1c values \[-365, 0\] days * At least two dispensing claims for metformin \[-180,0\] days * 1 or more recorded HbA1c values \[-90,0\] days * Age between 18-80 \[0,0\] days

Exclusion criteria

* Cancer, malignant neoplasm, or MEN2 \[-1,825,0\] days * Use of other anti-diabetic medications \[-180,0\] days * Cirrhosis or Hepatic decompensation \[-180,0\] days * Viral hepatitis B or C \[-180,0\] days * Stage 5 CKD, ESRD, dialysis or renal transplant \[-180,0\] days * MI or HF \[-180,0\] days * Treatment with Anti-VEGFi or Photocoagulation \[-180,0\] days * Hypertensive crisis or uncontrolled hypertension \[-180,0\] days * Two diagnoses of hypoglycemia \[-180,0\] days * Alcohol/drug abuse/dependence \[-180,0\] days * Dementia and brain damages or non-compliance \[-180,0\] days * Pregnancy \[-180,0\] days * Type 1 DM, DKA, or other metabolic acidosis \[-180,0\] days * Systemic corticosteroids \[-90,0\] days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Hazard of change in HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment (end of follow-up)26-week follow-up window with a median follow-up time of 99 [84, 148] daysClaims-based algorithm: relative hazard of change in HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment (end of follow-up)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026