Skip to content

Use Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Somatic Symptom Disorder

Use Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Somatic Symptom Disorder: A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Crossover Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05161819
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-12-17
Start date
2022-08-29
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Somatic Symptom Disorder

Keywords

somatic symptom disorder, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, somatic distress, health anxiety

Brief summary

This is a randomized double-blind sham-controlled crossover study; the interventions are high-frequency rTMS stimulation on left DLPFC and sham control. The study population is the patient with somatic symptom disorder. The primary outcomes are somatic distress and health anxiety.

Detailed description

Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) is a psychiatric diagnosis featured with somatic distress and health anxiety. It is overlapped with functional disorders. Whether it has effective treatment is a clinically important issue. Current evidence indicates that pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy are both helpful for SSD. Among other treatment options, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is attached important in psychiatric field; it can cause activation or inhibition of specific brain regions via magnetic stimulation. Previous studies have disclosed that rTMS is helpful for depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-stroke rehabilitation, etc. Regarding functional disorders, fibromyalgia has been found to be benefited from rTMS; the effective approaches include giving high-frequency stimulation on left M1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Chronic tinnitus was also found to have response to rTMS. SSD and fibromyalgia are highly overlapped; SSD and depression are often comorbid. Therefore, SSD may also be benefited from left DLPFC high-frequency stimulation. Our previous study revealed that dysfunction of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is associated with persistent interference of the somatic discomforts; stimulation on DLPFC can cause ACC activation. This study program was designed based on the above information. It is a randomized double-blind sham-controlled crossover study; the interventions are high-frequency rTMS stimulation on left DLPFC and sham control. The primary outcomes are somatic distress and health anxiety. There is not study about rTMS on SSD in literature; the investigators expect this study to be able to provide more understanding on this field.

Interventions

DEVICERepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

High-frequency stimulation (10Hz), 120% motor threshold, 40 trains, 1600 pulses

DEVICESham stimulation

High-frequency stimulation (10Hz), 120% motor threshold, 40 trains, 1600 pulses (with sham coil)

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with somatic symptom disorder (confirmed by psychiatrists) * Age 20-70

Exclusion criteria

* Having psychotic symptoms or cognitive impairment * Having potentially lethal illness * Using cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators * Currently pregnant or having plans to become pregnant within the next three months * Received rTMS treatment within three months * Cannot read the questionnaires by oneself * Having to take the following medications persistently: bupropion \>300 mg/day、TCA、clozapine、chlorpromazine、foscarnet、ganciclovir、ritonavir、theophylline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scores of Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)Week 3 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of somatic distress. Score range is 0 to 30; higher score means more severe somatic distress
Scores of Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ)Week 3 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of health anxiety. Score range is 0 to 63; higher score means more severe health anxiety

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scores of Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)Week 1, 2 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of somatic distress. Score range is 0 to 30; higher score means more severe somatic distress
Scores of Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ)Week 1, 2 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of health anxiety. Score range is 0 to 63; higher score means more severe health anxiety
Scores of Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)Week 1, 2, 3 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of depression. Score range is 0 to 63; higher score means more severe depression
Scores of Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)Week 1, 2, 3 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of anxiety. Score range is 0 to 63; higher score means more severe anxiety
Scores of Cognitions About Body and Health Questionnaire (CABAH)Week 1, 2, 3 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of cognitions about health. Score range is 0 to 117; higher score means more severe cognitive distortion about health
Heart rate variabilityWeek 1, 2, 3 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of parasympathetic activity
Skin conductanceWeek 1, 2, 3 (comparing with the data in week 0) of the two sections (rTMS and sham)Measurement of sympathetic activity

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

CONTACTWei-Lieh Huang, MD, PhD
weiliehhuang@gmail.com886-5-5323911
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWei-Lieh Huang, MD, PhD

National Taiwan University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026