Skip to content

A Peer-Driven Intervention to Increase PrEP Uptake Among Minority MSM

Peer-driven Intervention Promoting PrEP Uptake Among African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05161663
Enrollment
98
Registered
2021-12-17
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2024-12-23
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

pre-exposure prophylaxis

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to develop an effective peer-driven intervention (PDI) approach and assess its feasibility and efficacy on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among men who have sex with men.

Detailed description

This proposed study aims to assess the effect of a peer-driven intervention (PDI) on promoting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino men who have sex with men (MSM). PDI is based on respondent-driven sampling (RDS) or snowball sampling. PDI is a chain referral approach and includes both peer referral and peer education. Index peers will be purposefully sampled to reflect the diversity of our study population through local clinics, community organizations, and online. Index peers will receive a four-hour formal training about PrEP and HIV, educate members of their social network, and encourage them to initiate PrEP. Each index peers will be given three referral coupons. Referred peers will schedule a research visit to complete a short survey and then be referred to the local PrEP clinic if they are interested in starting PrEP. These referred individuals will also serve as index peers for the following wave of recruitment. We expect to achieve a robust sample of AA and H/L MSM within six waves of recruitment as peers will educate and recruit study participants through their social networks. Given the nature of RDS, the study design will include a concurrent non-randomized control group, which will be recruited using venue-based sampling (e.g. gay dance clubs, bars, and social organizations). This has been used in previous RDS studies as an appropriate study design and comparison group. We will identify appropriate venues that AA and H/L MSM frequent using one-to-one qualitative interviews in Specific Aim 1. Research staff will visit these venues at specific times to recruit AA and H/L MSM. MSM who are willing to participate in this study will receive PrEP and HIV education offered by research staff and complete a short survey during outreach. Individuals who are interested in PrEP uptake will be referred to the PrEP clinic. All study participants, regardless of PrEP status (initiated or not initiated), will be followed for six months. Each individual will complete three visits, including baseline, three-month, and six-month follow-ups. This study has two independent arms. Our primary outcome is PrEP uptake, which is defined as a binary variable (Yes vs. No). We will calculate the study power using the method for two independent proportions power analyses. Our local STD clinic data shows only 8% of AA and H/L MSM have used PrEP and we will assume that 8% of AA and H/L MSM recruited through venue-based sampling will initiate PrEP. We expect to observe at least a 14% increase in PrEP uptake in the PDI group. To have 80% of power (Type I error =0.05), we will recruit 100 participants (N=100, 50 AA, and 50 H/L MSM) in each group. PrEP uptake measured by receiving a prescription for the medication and filling a prescription at a pharmacy will be treated as time-to-event variables. We will perform survival analysis techniques (Kaplan-Meier models and Cox proportional hazards models) to assess the effect of the PDI on PrEP initiation. Self-reported PrEP adherence and drug concentration level (Yes vs. No) will be treated as binary variables and multivariate logistic regression will be performed.

Interventions

This peer-driven intervention (PDI), modified based on respondent-driven sampling (RDS) or snowball sampling, is a "chain referral" approach. Index peers will be purposefully selected to reflect the diversity of African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino (H/L) men who have sex with men (MSM) and are required to take a formal training about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and HIV. These index peers will educate members of their social networks and encourage them to initiate PrEP. Those referred peers will schedule an appointment to complete a short survey and will be referred to our PrEP clinic if they are interested in PrEP uptake. The referred peers will serve as index peers for the following wave of recruitment. It is expected to achieve a robust sample of AA and H/L within six waves of recruitment. This PDI approach is potential to engage AA and H/L who are most at risk of HIV acquisition in PrEP uptake and could contribute to reducing the concentrated HIV epidemic.

Sponsors

The Miriam Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No mask

Intervention model description

This peer-driven intervention (PDI), modified based on respondent-driven sampling (RDS) or snowball sampling, is a "chain referral" approach. Index peers will be purposefully selected to reflect the diversity of African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino (H/L) men who have sex with men (MSM) and are required to take a formal training about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and HIV. These index peers will educate members of their social networks and encourage them to initiate PrEP. Those referred peers will schedule an appointment to complete a short survey and will be referred to our PrEP clinic if they are interested in PrEP uptake. The referred peers will serve as index peers for the following wave of recruitment. It is expected to achieve a robust sample of AA and H/L within six waves of recruitment. This PDI approach is potential to engage AA and H/L who are most at risk of HIV acquisition in PrEP uptake and could contribute to reducing the concentrated HIV epidemic.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible for this study, participants must meet the following requirements: Age: 18 years of age or older. Gender/Sex: Assigned male at birth and currently identify as male. Sexual Orientation/Behavior: Having sex with men in the past three months. PrEP Status: Not currently on PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis). Language: English- or Spanish-speaking.

Exclusion criteria

Individuals meeting any of the following will be excluded: Age: Less than 18 years of age. Sexual Behavior: No history of having sex with men in the past three months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake0-6 monthsParticipant self-report of having initiated PrEP medication at any point between the baseline visit and the 6-month follow-up. Data represent the number of participants who provided a 'Yes' response to the assessment question: 'Have you started taking PrEP since your last visit?
Number of Participants With PrEP Persistence0-6 monthsThe number of participants who remained on PrEP medication without a gap of more than 30 days throughout the 6-month study period, as reported during follow-up interviews.
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence30 days prior to 6-month follow-up visitParticipant adherence to the prescribed PrEP regimen over the 30 days prior to the 6-month follow-up visit, measured via self-report. Adherence was calculated based on the frequency of doses taken per week. Participants were considered adherent if they reported taking at least 4 pills per week, which is the threshold associated with high levels of protection against HIV acquisition.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJun Tao

The Miriam Hospital

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment Period Dates: July 2022 - September 2024. Recruitment Methods The study used a two-arm recruitment strategy: Venue-Based (Control): In-person recruitment at an outpatient STI clinic in Rhode Island. Outreach at LGBTQ+ nightlife venues (bars, clubs) and a university LGBTQ+ center. Distribution of flyers and coasters with QR codes. Peer-Driven Intervention (PDI): Peer Educators recruited members of their social networks. Five electronic referral cards per peer educator.

Pre-assignment details

No significant events or deviations occurred between enrollment and group assignment; all participants proceeded directly to baseline assessments and standardized PrEP counseling as per protocol.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous24 Years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
PrEP use at Baseline39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male assigned at birth only
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 460 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 460 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 460 / 39

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026