Skip to content

Serranator Recoil Study

Recoil Feasibility Study for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Infrapopliteal Arteries Comparing Serration Angioplasty (Serranator® Device) vs. Plain Balloon Angioplasty (POBA)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05161039
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-12-16
Start date
2021-11-15
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2022-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease, Critical Limb Ischemia

Brief summary

The study objective is to assess the ability to define and measure post treatment recoil in infrapopliteal arteries. Preliminary evidence as to the differences between serration angioplasty and standard balloon angioplasty as defined by post treatment recoil, lumen gain, and dissection will be collected.

Detailed description

Multi-center, feasibility study treating up to 20 atherosclerotic lesions in the infrapopliteal arteries. The study will capture angiographic imaging (pre, during, post, and post 15 mins) for all lesions, and a subset (up to 10) of IVUS imaging data (pre, post, and post 15 mins), to compare serration angioplasty vs standard angioplasty and its effects on vessel recoil and final diameter stenosis.

Interventions

Serranator® PTA Serration Balloon Catheter manufactured by Cagent Vascular

DEVICEPOBA

Plain balloon angioplasty device

Sponsors

Cagent Vascular LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female of \>18 years old. 2. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test within 7 days of index procedure. 3. Subject or subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and comply, and has signed the consent form. 4. Subject has Rutherford Clinical Category 3, 4, 5, or 6. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: 1. Target lesion(s) has stenosis \>70% by visual assessment; 2. De-novo, or non-stented re-stenotic lesions; 3. Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm, inclusive; 4. Target lesions involve infrapopliteal tibial arteries including pedal; 5. A target lesion may consist of one long or multiple serial lesions that are up to and including 12 cm in length; 6. If a second lesion is identified in another vessel, the second lesion can also be treated and if treated will be treated with the alternate treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Evidence of aneurysm or acute thrombus in the target vessel. 2. Subject has an allergy to contrast medium that cannot be pretreated. 3. Subject is pregnant or breastfeeding. Angiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of post treatment recoil15 minutes post procedureObtain preliminary data on post treatment recoil in infrapopliteal arteries utilizing angiographic and IVUS data following serration angioplasty and standard angioplasty.

Countries

Germany, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactRobert Giasolli
rgiasolli@cagentvascular.com610.688.2006

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026