Skip to content

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Intercostal Block

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Intercostal Block for Rib Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05160155
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-12-16
Start date
2021-12-03
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2023-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rib Fractures, Serratus Anterior Plane Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block, Acute Pain

Keywords

Rib Fractures, Serratus Anterior Plane Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block

Brief summary

More than 50% of patients presenting with chest trauma experience rib fractures and these rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability. Many of these adverse outcomes result from poorly controlled pain that interferes with breathing, leading to atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure. Therefore, early provision of adequate analgesia is crucial in the management of these patients. The basic stones of analgesic therapy are oral and intravenous drugs such as paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids. However, patients with more significant injuries or comorbidities often require interventional procedures to provide adequate analgesia and avoid opioid-related side effects. Thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral blocks have traditionally been used, but these techniques are associated with side effects and may cause hemodynamic instability. Today, the use of ultrasonography (USG) guided block techniques such as erector spinae plane block (ESPB), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and intercostal block (ICB) has increased. These techniques are considered to be simpler and theoretically safer. Although ICB is frequently mentioned in the literature, the publications of new plane blocks such as ESPB and SAPB are new and few in number. In this study, SAPB and ICP to be performed with USG will be evaluated in terms of analgesic effect.

Interventions

PROCEDURESerratus Anterior Plane Block

Serratus anterior plane block will be performed unilaterally, under US guidance.

Intercostal Block will be performed unilaterally, under US guidance.

Sponsors

Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 65 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II-III * Body mass index between 18-30 kg/m2 * Patients with 6 or less rib fractures

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusing the procedure * History of chronic analgesic or opioid therapy * History of local anesthetic allergy * Infection in the intervention area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scores24 hours after blockPain will be assessed at rest and while coughing using the visual analog scale on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Pain assessment will be done at 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 16th and 24th hours after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for additional analgesia24 hours after blockWhether the patients need additional analgesia after the block and the amount of additional analgesia needed will be recorded.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026