Skip to content

In-Home Technology for Caregivers of People With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Wearables

Commercializing In-Home Supportive Technology for Dementia Caregivers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05159557
Enrollment
63
Registered
2021-12-16
Start date
2022-08-22
Completion date
2024-03-25
Last updated
2025-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Caregivers, Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's disease, Technology, Wearables

Brief summary

This study aims to develop, evaluate, and commercialize an in-home supportive technology that is designed to alleviate anxiety, burden, and loneliness in spousal and familial caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment by integrating wearable devices (e.g., Apple Watches).

Detailed description

This study aims to develop, refine, evaluate, and commercialize a hardware/software system designed to integrate in-home sensors and devices, Internet-of-Things technologies (i.e., devices that can be controlled and communicated with via the internet), and social networking to create a more safe and supportive home environment for caregivers and people who have Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment. The system monitors troublesome behaviors in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (e.g., wandering), and targets mechanisms (e.g., worry, social isolation) thought to link behavioral symptoms in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment with adverse caregiver outcomes (declines in health and well-being). The system is designed to minimize demands on caregivers' limited time and energy and to provide a platform for data collection that can be used by researchers and care professionals. Hypotheses: 1. Caregivers in the active treatment condition will have better health and well-being (i.e., less caregiver depression, anxiety, loneliness, and burden) and greater user satisfaction compared to those in the control condition. 2. The magnitude of the difference in health and well-being benefits for caregivers in the active treatment condition compared to those in the control condition will increase over time (reflecting additional bot learning and adjustment to changing caregiver needs). 3. In the active treatment condition, greater utilization of features related to warnings (e.g., activating warnings, receiving warnings), social connection (e.g., adding Trusted Circle members), and information (e.g., accessing on-line resources through app) will be associated with greater decreases in depression and anxiety and greater increases in well-being.

Interventions

Intelligent bots monitor the in-home sensors, learn typical patterns, and provide caregivers with text messages and alerts via cell phone when worrisome behaviors occur. Caregivers are able to: (a) select services (e.g., warnings for falls, wandering, late night activity); (b) access daily reports (summaries of daily activities that can also be shared with health care providers); and (c) obtain support (e.g. Caregiver Support Groups that connect caregivers with knowledgeable experts and other caregivers, Caregiver Events that provide virtual meetings about relevant topics, and Trusted Circle task management to distribute the caregiving work load).

Intelligent bots monitor the in-home water leak sensor and provide caregivers with text messages and alerts via cell phone when worrisome conditions occur.

Sponsors

People Power Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Berkeley
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment arms by People Power. Identical systems are self-installed by caregivers in all homes regardless of treatment arm. Initiating the features of the system appropriate to the assigned treatment arm is done remotely by a member of the People Power staff following the installation. All participants complete the same questionnaires at the same intervals.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Caregivers are fluent/literate in English * Caregivers currently reside in the United States with spouse/family member who has received a medical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, other dementia, or mild cognitive impairment * Caregivers primarily use a smartphone (e.g., iPhone, Android) * Caregivers have internet and WiFi service

Exclusion criteria

* Caregivers providing care for individuals with known non-neurodegenerative conditions affecting behavior and cognition * Caregivers providing care for individuals with longstanding Axis I psychiatric disorder Caregivers providing care for individuals with metabolic disorder or major organ dysfunction * Caregivers providing care for individuals with alcohol abuse or dependence (within 5 years of dementia onset) * Caregivers providing care for individuals with head trauma with loss of consciousness greater than 30 minutes * Caregivers providing care for individuals with contraindications to MRI imaging * Caregivers providing care for individuals with large confluent white matter lesions * Caregivers providing care for individuals with significant systemic medical illness * Caregivers providing care for individuals who use a medication likely to affect central nervous system functions adversely

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)3 months after baselineQuestionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)6 months after baselineQuestionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form3 months after baselineQuestionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form6 months after baselineQuestionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)3 months after baselineQuestionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)6 months after baselineQuestionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale3 months after baselineQuestionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale6 months after baselineQuestionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Note that outcomes are only assessed regarding caregiver health and well-being. Patients did not provide any information; therefore, all information reported for demographics and measures is only regarding caregivers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
In-Home Technology System
The full system \[(a) 1 gateway that connects with home internet to communicate/control the equipment; (b) 5 indoor motion sensors; (c) 3 door/cabinet entry sensors; (d) 1 water leak sensor; (e) 1 call for help button; (f) 2 motion-activated LED night lights; (g) 1 Apple Watch to detect falls and activity outside the home\] will be self-installed by caregivers (N=60) in their homes. Monitoring of sensors, provision of warnings, messaging, and social networking features will be activated remotely for those participants who have been randomly assigned to this arm. Participation will extend over a 6 month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 3 times (at the time of installation and every 3 months thereafter). In-Home Technology System: Intelligent bots monitor the in-home sensors, learn typical patterns, and provide caregivers with text messages and alerts via cell phone when worrisome behaviors occur. Caregivers are able to: (a) select services (e.g., warnings for falls, wandering, late night activity); (b) access daily reports (summaries of daily activities that can also be shared with health care providers); and (c) obtain support (e.g. Caregiver Support Groups that connect caregivers with knowledgeable experts and other caregivers, Caregiver Events that provide virtual meetings about relevant topics, and Trusted Circle task management to distribute the caregiving work load).
31
Limited In-Home Technology System
The full system \[(a) 1 gateway that connects with home internet to communicate/control the equipment; (b) 5 indoor motion sensors; (c) 3 door/cabinet entry sensors; (d) 1 water leak sensor; (e) 1 call for help button; (f) 2 motion-activated LED night lights\], with the exception of the Apple Watch that those in the experimental condition receive will be self-installed by caregivers (N=60) in their homes. Only monitoring of the water leak and associated warnings will be activated remotely for those participants who have been randomly assigned to this limited (sham comparator) arm. Limited In-Home Technology: Intelligent bots monitor the in-home water leak sensor and provide caregivers with text messages and alerts via cell phone when worrisome conditions occur.
32
Total63

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLimited In-Home Technology SystemTotalIn-Home Technology System
Age, Continuous59.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.25
60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68
62.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82
Beck Anxiety Inventory8.91 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.66
9.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.55
9.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.57
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale14.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
16.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.89
18.19 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.83
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
27 Participants50 Participants23 Participants
Satisfaction with Life21.59 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.23
20.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.09
18.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants41 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants22 Participants14 Participants
Zarit Burden Inventory20.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
20.91 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.97
21.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.01

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 311 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 311 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.

Time frame: 3 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.21
Limited In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Primary

3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.

Time frame: 3 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.34
Limited In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)14.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.73
Primary

3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale

Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.

Time frame: 3 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale18.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.84
Limited In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Primary

3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form

Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Time frame: 3 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form21.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Limited In-Home Technology System3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form19.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Primary

6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)9.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
Limited In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)7.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.11
Primary

6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)16.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.96
Limited In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)13.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.41
Primary

6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale

Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale18.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.76
Limited In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale20.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.85
Primary

6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form

Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form22.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.76
Limited In-Home Technology System6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form18.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.39

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026