Skip to content

Video Laryngoscope Versus USB Borescope in Difficult Intubation

Video Laryngoscope Versus a USB Borescope Aided Endotracheal Intubation in Adults With Anticipated Difficult Airway

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05158088
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-12-15
Start date
2021-12-20
Completion date
2022-04-01
Last updated
2022-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Keywords

Airway, Intubation, Videolaryngoscope, Borescope

Brief summary

Video Laryngoscope Versus a USB Borescope Aided Endotracheal Intubation in Adults With Anticipated Difficult Airway

Detailed description

For patients allocated to the USB-borescope technique, a proper size endotracheal tube will be placed over the USB-borescope (with an external diameter of 5.5 mm) which will be coated externally with water-soluble lubricant. The proper size laryngoscope blade will be inserted. The USB-borescope will be placed through the oral cavity and will be advanced while tracking it on a mobile phone, it will be advanced to the glottic opening. If needed, rotation of USB-borescope and/or external laryngeal manipulation will be used to align it with the vocal cord. For patients allocated to the intubation over Video Laryngoscope technique, video laryngoscope (Insighters insight is3) proper size blade will be placed and introduction of the Video Laryngoscope till viewing the glottis opening then insertion of a proper sized endotracheal tube

Interventions

DEVICEBorescope

Endotracheal intubation using borescope

Endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscope

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 1.American Society of Anesthesiologist ASA physical status I-II patients. 2.Both genders. 3.Age18-60 years old 4.BMI \<35 5.patients with El-Ganzouri score more than or equal to 4

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of pulmonary diseases * Uncontrolled hypertension * Ischemic heart disease * Cervical spine fracture * Limited mouth opening * known to have tumors or polyps in the upper airway * History of difficult intubation or difficult bag-mask ventilation * Patients with difficult bag-mask ventilation after induction of anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time of intubation5 minutesin seconds

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood pressure before intubation, every 5 minutes after intubation till 15 minutes after intubation15 minutesSystolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures
Heart rate Heart rate15 minutesHeart rate before intubation, every 5 minutes after intubation till 15 minutes after intubation
The degree of view clarity1 minuteCormack-Lehane grading
Incidence of complications48 hoursIncidence of complications as bleeding, failure
Number of trials for correct endotracheal intubation2 minutesNumber of trial till successful intubation

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026