Skip to content

Effect of Physiotherapy in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Nonspecific Lower Back Pain

Effect of Physiotherapy in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Nonspecific Lower Back Pain. A Brief Intervention Focusing on Patient Reported Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05156957
Acronym
EPAC-II
Enrollment
126
Registered
2021-12-14
Start date
2022-01-05
Completion date
2023-08-11
Last updated
2024-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Back Pain

Keywords

physiotherapy intervention, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), nonspecific lower back pain

Brief summary

Physiotherapy is a long established therapy in lower back pain. It is unknown if physiotherapeutic interventions in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with nonspecific lower back pain are beneficial. The aim of this study is to assess whether patients presenting to the emergency department with non-specific low risk low back pain would benefit from a physiotherapy intervention, as compared to patients without physiotherapy intervention at time of ED presentation.

Interventions

The intervention consists of a brief physiotherapeutic assessment by a short physical performance battery, a brief information on the expected course of the condition and instructions on self-management regarding back friendly behaviour (eg. respecting the pain, staying active and back friendly movement strategies). Additionally, three exercises for daily self-guided therapy are included to the intervention: Turning in bed and coming to a sitting position, sit to stand and squats standing in front of a wall.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Experiencing nonspecific lower back pain * Presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) of the University Hospital Basel

Exclusion criteria

* Inpatient disposition after ED work-up * Red Flags at time of ED-presentation: 1. Major trauma in all patients 2. Fractures leading to immobilization 3. Severe or progressive sensory alteration or weakness 4. Bladder or bowel dysfunction 5. Evidence of neurological deficit on physical examination 6. Severe chronic disease, such as metastasized cancer, palliative care * Epidural steroid injections in the last 3 months * Inability or contraindications to undergo the investigated intervention or to follow the study procedures, e.g. due to certain neurological disorders, language problems, psychological disorders, cognitive impairment, physical inability etc. * Prior enrolment in this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)At Day 0 and at Day 7 ± 7 daysThis self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel. Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of the interventionAt Day 0The questionnaire was completed by the physiotherapist after the intervention and consisted of six questions about the feasibility of the physiotherapeutic intervention. Each question had a scale of 1 (= no, strongly disagree) to 6 (=yes, strongly agree) for possible answers.
Patient satisfactionAt Day 7 ± 7 daysThis self-completed questionnaire contains six questions about patient satisfaction with their ED visit on day 0. Each question could be answered with a score from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much).
Adherence to therapy recommendationsAt Day 7 ± 7 daysPatients were asked if they were able to adhere to the behavioral and exercise recommendations given to them on Day 0.
StarT Back Screening Tool (SBST)Day 0, Day 7 ± 7 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysThe SBST categorises back pain patients into 3 categories: low, medium and high risk. It consists of 9 items, each with a value of 0 or 1 points. The SBST Score is calculated by summing the points from each question, with a minimum score of 0 points and a maximum score of 9 points.
Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)At Day 0, Day 7 ± 7 days, Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysThe NRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain ('0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. no pain) to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. pain as bad as you can imagine))
Pain medication useAt Day 0, Day 7 ± 7 days, Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysQuestions about the use of pain medication and how long pain medication have been used.
Utilization of medical resourcesAt Day 7 ± 7 days, Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysPatients were asked if they had seen a physiotherapist, an emergency department, a general practitioner, a specialist, been hospitalized or had imaging since the last contact.
Ability to workAt Day 7 ± 7 days, Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysPatients were asked if they were going back to work.
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysThis self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel. Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026