Skip to content

Effect of Physiotherapy in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department After a Fall

Effect of Physiotherapy in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department After a Fall. A Brief Intervention Focusing on Patient Reported Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05156944
Acronym
EPAC-I
Enrollment
104
Registered
2021-12-14
Start date
2022-01-06
Completion date
2023-08-11
Last updated
2024-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fear of Falling

Keywords

fall, Ground Level Fall (GLF), physiotherapy intervention, short International Falls efficacy scale (sFES-I)

Brief summary

The aim of this monocentric, block-randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study is to assess whether patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a fall within the past 7 days would benefit from a physiotherapy intervention, as compared to patients without physiotherapy intervention at the time of ED presentation. Primary objective of this study is to assess fear of falling 7 days after ED presentation with versus without a physiotherapy intervention.

Interventions

The intervention consists of a brief physiotherapeutic assessment, the short physical performance battery, a brief information on the expected course of the condition, a check of fall hazards at home using the Bundesamt für Unfallverhütung (bfu) checklist, and instructions on self-management (eg. staying active, adaptation of behavior and surrounding at home). Additionally, two exercises for daily self-guided therapy will be instructed, namely, sit-to-stand and balance performance exercises.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Age ≥65 * History of falls within the last 7 days * Presentation to the ED of the University Hospital Basel

Exclusion criteria

* Inpatient disposition after ED work-up * Immobilizing fractures of the lower extremities * Inability or contraindications to undergo the investigated intervention or follow the study procedures, e.g. due to certain neurological disorders (such as parkinsonism, hemiplegia, severe multiple sclerosis), language problems, psychological disorders, cognitive impairment * Prior enrolment in this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in short International Falls efficacy scale (sFES-I)At Day 0 and Day 7 ± 7 daysChange in the fear of falling between groups at day 7, measured by the short International Falls efficacy scale (sFES-I). It is a 7-item questionnaire where individuals are instructed to score their concern of falling during an activity on a 4 point Likert scale with 1 as not concerned at all and 4 as very concerned. The item scores are summed up to obtain a total, with a higher score indicating a higher fear of falling.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective functional levels in the intervention groupAt Day 0 and Day 7 ± 7 daysFunctional levels measured by SPPB in the intervention group
Satisfaction with ED work-upDay 7 ± 7 daysPatients' satisfaction with ED work-up assessed by questionnaire
Feasibility of the interventionAt Day 0Feasibility of the intervention assessed by a questionnaire filled out by the physiotherapist
Utilization of medical resourcesDay 7 ± 7 days, Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysComparison of the use of medical resources between both groups (ED visits, GP visits, hospitalization, physiotherapy, imaging; all since inclusion)
Occurence of fallsDay 7 ± 7 days, Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysOccurence of falls following randomization from patient recollection
Change in short International Falls efficacy scale (sFES-I)At Day 0, Day 7 ± 7 days, Day 21 ± 3 days, Day 42 ± 3 daysChange in the fear of falling, measured by the short International Falls efficacy scale (sFES-I). It is a 16-item questionnaire where individuals are instructed to score their concern of falling during an activity on a 4 point Likert scale with 1 as not concerned at all and 4 as very concerned. The item scores are summed up to obtain a total, with higher the score, higher being the concern for falling.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026