Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficiency of Manual Therapy and Exercise in People With Mechanical Neck Pain

Comparison of the Efficiency of Manual Therapy and Exercise in People With Mechanical Neck Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05154526
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-12-13
Start date
2021-12-13
Completion date
2022-04-19
Last updated
2023-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mobility Limitation, Neck Pain

Keywords

neck pain, mechanical neck pain, manual therapy, exercise

Brief summary

Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is defined as neck pain that becomes evident with the posture of the cervical region, movement or palpation of the cervical region muscles, felt in the cervical, occipital or posterior scapular region without spreading to the upper extremity, and without any trauma or specific pathology underlying the complaints. Most of the MNP cases are due to muscular or paraspinal soft tissue problems and show improvement in the first 6 weeks with conservative treatment methods. Various manual therapy techniques and various exercises are reported to have positive effects on neck pain. However, the isolated effects of these techniques in people with MNP are not fully known. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effects of two different treatment programs in which the manual therapy technique and the exercise program are applied in individuals with MNP. In addition, comparing the effect of the treatment program in which manual therapy and exercise program are applied together with the isolated effects of these techniques is another aim.

Detailed description

Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is defined as neck pain that becomes evident with the posture of the cervical region, movement or palpation of the cervical region muscles, felt in the cervical, occipital or posterior scapular region without spreading to the upper extremity, and without any trauma or specific pathology underlying the complaints. MNP causes symptoms such as pain in the cervical region, increased sensitivity to pressure, decrease in active range of motion (ROM) of the cervical region, drowsiness, and dizziness. Most of the MNP cases are due to muscular or paraspinal soft tissue problems and show improvement in the first 6 weeks with conservative treatment methods. When the current treatment recommendations are examined according to the duration of neck pain accompanied by limitation of movement, an exercise program that includes thoracic region mobilization, cervical ROM exercises, and strengthening and stretching exercises for the scapulothoracic region and upper extremity muscles is recommended for acute neck pain. In addition, various manual therapy techniques can be applied to the cervical region. In subacute neck pain, an exercise program is applied to increase the endurance of the neck and upper extremity muscles. During this period, various manual therapy methods can be applied to the thoracic and cervical region. In chronic neck pain, combined treatment applications including various exercises, mobilization and manipulation techniques, dry needling, laser and intermittent manual/mechanical traction are recommended. It is stated that the high-velocity low-amplitude technique, which is among the manual therapy techniques and used in many musculoskeletal problems, can increase the ROM, decrease the pain and improve the function. Various manual therapy techniques and various exercises are reported to have positive effects on neck pain. However, the isolated effects of these techniques in people with MNP are not fully known. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effects of two different treatment programs in which the manual therapy technique and the exercise program are applied in individuals with MNP. In addition, comparing the effect of the treatment program in which manual therapy and exercise program are applied together with the isolated effects of these techniques is another aim.

Interventions

OTHERManual Therapy

Manual Therapy: High velocity-low amplitude technique

OTHERExercise Program

Exercise program

Sponsors

Tuğba Akgüller
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with MNP * Decrease in cervical region ROM * Ability to adapt to verbal, written and visual instructions

Exclusion criteria

* Spine surgery history * Neurological neck pain in the cervical region * Presence of tumor in the cervical region * Blood coagulation disorders * Vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency * Cervical region trauma history * Communicative/mental problems that prevent participation in treatment * Inflammatory rheumatological diseases affecting the cervical region * Physiotherapy and rehabilitation treatments for neck pain in the last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck Disability Index6 weeksThe neck function of the patients will be evaluated with the Neck Disability Index. The disability levels of the participants due to neck pain will be evaluated with the 'Neck Disability Index' . This scale consists of 10 items including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleep status and leisure activities. Each item was scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability).
Pain intensity6 weeksPain intensity of the patients at rest, during activity and at night was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In this evaluation, individuals were told that the number 0 on the 10 cm long horizontal line expresses no pain, and the number 10 indicates unbearable pain and that individuals should mark their intensity of pain on this line.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of Motion (ROM)6 weeksActive neck flexion-extension, right-left lateral flexion and right-left rotation ROM of the participants will be evaluated with cervical goniometer.
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)6 weeks lParticipants' PPTs will be evaluated with a pressure algometer (Baseline Push-Pull Force Gauge®, Fabrication Enterprises, Inc.) that can measure pressure in kilograms and pounds, with a 1 cm diameter circular rubber tip attached to the piston of the pressure gauge
36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)6 weeksPatients' quality of life will be evaluated with SF-36. This scale is a general health questionnaire that evaluates the person's perception of quality of life in the last four weeks under 8 sub-headings and 36 items. The sub-headings it includes; physical functions, physical roles, pain, social functions, mental health, emotional roles, energy and general health perception.
Patient satisfaction levelAt the end of 6-weeksPatient Satisfaction will be assessed with the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale. The scale to be used consists of 5 points (-2: I am much worse. -1: I am worse, 0: I am the same, +1: I am better, +2: I am much better).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026