Skip to content

PSMA PET Additive Value for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Men With Negative/Equivocal MRI

Prospective Multi-centre Randomised Trial of the Additive Diagnostic Value of PSMA PET in Men With Negative/Equivocal MRI in the Diagnosis of Significant Prostate Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05154162
Acronym
PRIMARY2
Enrollment
660
Registered
2021-12-10
Start date
2022-03-02
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Prostate, Cancer, PSMA PET

Brief summary

This clinical trial will evaluate PSMA PET additive value for significant prostate cancer (sPCa) diagnosis in men with negative/equivocal MRI

Detailed description

This open label, phase III, multi-centre, randomised trial with a non-inferiority objective will evaluate the additive diagnostic value of PSMA PET for men with negative/equivocal MRI in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer. Patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer with PI-RADS 2 or 3 on MRI, meeting all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomised into experimental and control arms. Patients in the experimental arm would be subjected to Pelvic PSMA PET/CT, wherein the PSMA negative patients would not undergo biopsy as opposed to PSMA positive patients who will be subjected to Transperineal targeted prostate biopsy. Whereas patients in the control arm will only receive Standard of Care (SOC) with no additional imaging (PSMA PET) and will undergo Transperineal template prostate biopsy. The co-primary objectives are to assess (1) the percentage of men with sPCa in the experimental arm (transperineal targeted biopsy) compared to the control arm (transperineal template biopsy) defined as the presence of a single biopsy core indicating disease Gleason score (GS) 3+4(\>10%)=7, grade group (GG) 2, and (2) the percentage of men who avoid transperineal prostate biopsy between both arms. The secondary objectives include determining the percentage of clinically insignificant PCa on targeted biopsy (experimental arm) versus transperineal template biopsy (control arm); estimating the difference in complications from transperineal prostate biopsy between both arms; the health economics impact between the experimental and control arms; estimating the mean difference between both arms in change from baseline in health-related quality of life (QoL); estimating the mean difference between both arms at each time point in generalised anxiety and cancer worry.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPSMA PET/CT

PSMA PET/CT (limited to the pelvis)

PROCEDURETransperineal template prostate biopsy

Transperineal template prostate biopsies will be performed as per treating urologist's usual practice. No specific template for biopsy is prescribed for the purposes of the study. However, template sampling of the prostate is required, with a minimum of 12 cores, dependent on prostate volume. MRI will be available for any additional targeted biopsies required. Transperineal template biopsies must be labelled appropriately and sent for histopathological analysis.

PROCEDURETransperineal targeted prostate biopsy

If the PSMA PET/CT is normal, transperineal prostate biopsy would be omitted If the PSMA PET/CT is abnormal, transperineal prostate biopsies would be performed targeting the MRI (done prior to study) and PSMA PET/CT images

Sponsors

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
Lead SponsorOTHER
St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must meet all the following criteria for study entry: 1. Males aged ≥ 18 years at the time of consent 2. No previously diagnosed prostate cancer 3. No previous prostate biopsy 4. Having undergone MRI within 9 months prior to randomisation and meet one of the following criteria: * PI-RADS 2 AND ≥1 red flag defined as: * PSA density \>0.1 * Abnormal DRE * Strong family history (1 first degree relative or ≥2 second degree) * BRCA mutation * PSA \>10 * PSA doubling time \<36 months * PSA velocity \>0.75/year * PI-RADS 3 5. Intention for prostate biopsy 6. Willing and able to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from study entry: 1. Having a PSA \>20ng/ml 2. Having ≥ cT3 on DRE 3. Significant morbidity that, in the judgement of the investigator, would limit compliance with study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of sPCa on prostate biopsyWhen histology results are available, at an expected average of 14 days post-biopsysPCa defined as Gleason score 3+4(\>10%)=7, Grade group 2 Patients without biopsy (negative PSMA PET) are considered not to have sPCa.
Number of men who avoid transperineal prostate biopsy in the experimental armWhen the PSMA PET result is available, at most 28 days after randomisationIn the experimental arm, if PSMA PET is negative, the patient does not have biopsy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of insignificant prostate cancer (isPCa) on prostate biopsyWithin 3 months following randomisationisPCa defined as GS 3+3=6, GG 1 or GS 3+4(≤10%)=7, GG 2
Cost per quality adjusted life yearThrough study completion, estimated up to 2 yearscost-effectiveness analysis to assess the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained associated with the use of PSMA PET in addition to MRI compared with MRI alone for the diagnosis of sPCa. Importantly, this analysis will take into consideration the impact on costs and QoL associated with the hypothesised reduction in unnecessary biopsies arising from the improved accuracy of PSMA+MRI and the comparative interventions).
Health-related quality of life as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30.Within 7 days of randomisation and every 6 months ± 30 days after randomisationQuality of life (QoL) will be assessed using QLQ-C30, which contains 30 items across five functional scales, three symptom scales, global health status, and six single items. Participant responses are collected using a four-point response scale ranging from 'Not at all' to "Very much". Higher scores indicate better QoL and function, while high scores for the symptom scale represent a high level of symptoms.
Anxiety as measured by the GAD7 in the diagnosis of PCa.Within 7 days following randomisation and every 6 months ± 30 days after randomisationThe generalized anxiety disorder Scale (GAD-7)14 is a 7-item, patient-rated questionnaire for screening and severity measuring of generalised anxiety disorder. The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.
Cancer worry in the diagnosis of PCa.Within 7 days following randomisation and every 6 months ± 30 days after randomisationThe modified Cancer Worry Scale adaptation of Cancer Worry Scale is a 3-item questionnaire used in context of cancer worry in abnormal PSA levels in men participating in community screening program. The score is calculated by assigning scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4, to the categories 'not at all or rarely', 'sometimes', 'often', and 'a lot', respectively, and adding together the scores for the 3 questions. A final question asks about feelings of distress related to cancer risk.
Number of biopsy coresWithin 3 months following randomisationExperimental arm: For patients with a positive PSMA PET, the images, the report and a simplified template will be made available to the treating urologist. Up to four identified lesions on PSMA PET and/or MRI will be targeted with each lesion having a minimum 5 cores. Control arm: Transperineal template prostate biopsies will be performed as per treating urologist's usual practice. No specific template for biopsy is prescribed for the purposes of the study. However, template sampling of the prostate is required, with a minimum of 12 cores,dependent on prostate volume.
Incidence of complications following transperineal prostate biopsy.Within 7 days following randomisation and at 3 and 6 months after randomisationComplications following biopsy will be assessed with a modified questionnaire validated in the PRECISION trial. Part 1 following randomisation is a 9 item questionnaire. Part 2 is a 23 item questionnaire administered at 3 and 6 months to assess complications from transperineal prostate biopsy. The following complications will be assessed via these forms: fever, blood in urine, blood in semen, blood in stool, acute urinary retention, erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, urinary tract infection and pain in the perineum.
Incidence of erectile dysfunction following transperineal prostate biopsyWithin 7 days following randomisation and at 3 and 6 months after randomisationThe Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) is an adapted version of the 5 item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score, developed to diagnose the presence and severity of erectile dysfunction. This validated questionnaire has a range of scores from 1 to 25, grading erectile dysfunction into 5 categories (none, mild, mild to moderate, moderate and severe).
Number of men who have sPCa detected only with PSMA PET (MRI PI-RADS 2)Within 28 days following randomisationMeasured in the experimental arm in patients with positive PSMA PET and negative MRI (PIRADS 2). sPCa defined as Gleason score 3+4(\>10%)=7, Grade group 2

Countries

Australia

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Hofman

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLouise Emmett

St Vincent's Sydney

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMark Frydenberg

Cabrini Health

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSze-Ting Lee

Austin Health

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMatthew Roberts

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYang Du

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026