Skip to content

Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses of Cisatracurium in the Early Management of Pediatric ARDS

Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses of Cisatracurium in the Early Management of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05153525
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-12-10
Start date
2022-01-06
Completion date
2022-08-05
Last updated
2022-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pediatric

Keywords

Cisatracurium, PARDS

Brief summary

The aim of this work is to compare continuous infusion vs on need intermittent boluses of Cisatracurium in the early management of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome

Detailed description

In the pediatric population, Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a high mortality rate of approximately 24%. In addition, there is a lack of high-quality data to guide the use of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in mechanically ventilated children. Hence, there is a need to evaluate its use in pediatrics.

Interventions

DRUGIntermittent boluses of Cisatracurium

Thirty children with ARDS will be treated with intermittent boluses of Cisatracurium (0.1-0.15 mg/kg/dose).

DRUGIntravenous infusion of Cisatracurium for 24 hours

Thirty children with ARDS will be treated with intravenous infusion of Cisatracurium titrated from 1 mic/kg/min till reaching the desired effect for 24 hours.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Children with mild, moderate, and severe ARDS diagnosed according to criteria of Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) in 2015. 2. Children of both sexes aged from one month to 18 years. 3. Children diagnosed with ARDS \<48 hours before enrollment

Exclusion criteria

1. Continuous neuromuscular blockade at enrollment 2. Children on phenytoin and carbamazepine 3. Severe liver cirrhosis 4. High-risk medical illness (Bone marrow transplantation within the last one-year, Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage from vasculitis, Chronic respiratory failure, Burns \> 70% total body surface) 5. Previous hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reaction to Cisatracurium 6. Neuromuscular conditions that may potentiate neuromuscular blockade and/or impair effective spontaneous ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration on mechanical ventilationUp to 10 daysTime from patient's intubation till extubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum Interleukin-8 assessment48 hoursAssessing serum interleukin 8 on admission and after 48 hours
Length of pediatric intensive care unit stay28 daysTime from start of ventilation till discharge from PICU
Length of hospital stay28 daysTime from start of ventilation till discharge from hospital
28-day mortality28 daysAll children died after mechanical ventilation till day 28
Organ failure free days to day 2828 daysOrgan failure according to SOFA scores
Ventilation follow-up7 daysOxygenation Index/Oxygen saturation index on study days 1, 3, 7
Mechanical ventilation complications follow-up28 daysDevelopment of pneumothorax during mechanical ventilation
Pediatric intensive care unit acquired weakness28 daysManual muscle strength testing (Oxford testing)

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Khaled Talaat, PharmD
mohamedktalaat@pharm.tanta.edu.eg00201067967640

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026