Skip to content

Measuring Comfort and Clarity With Low Gain Feature in Pediatric Hearing Aid Users

Measuring Comfort and Clarity Using Low Gain Feature in Pediatric Hearing Aid Users

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05150964
Enrollment
16
Registered
2021-12-09
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2022-05-29
Last updated
2023-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

Comfort and clarity of speech will be measured in hearing impaired children age 8-17 using standard speech processing algorithm with a soft speech enhancer feature, referred to as the Adaptive Situational Gain (ASG) feature in study documents.

Interventions

receiver in the canal devices with custom earmolds

Sponsors

Arizona State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sonova AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or moderate-severe sensorineural hearing loss * Must use oral mode of communication * must speak English

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech Reception ThresholdInitial appointment (day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (Day 14 of study)A familiar spondee word list is presented at varying dB (decibel) levels. Threshold is defined as the lowest dB level at which a correct response occurs for two out of three ascending trials. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session, and counterbalanced across participants. Each session consisted of testing with the ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) feature on and off. The lower the number (dB level), the softer the participant is able to repeat the words correctly two out of three times.
Word Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.Initial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (day 14 of study)Familiar monosyllabic word list presented at 40 dB and 70 dB. Percentage of words correctly repeated is calculated. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off. The higher the score, the better the word recognition in each condition.
Multi-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPLInitial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (Day 14 of study)Out of a list of seven words, the participant repeats back as many words as they can recall. Percentage of correct words repeated back is calculated. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. One fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off. A higher percentage score indicates better multi-word recognition.
Nonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.Initial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (day 14 of study)A list of 10 3-word phrases are presented to the participant. The participant indicates if the phrase contains a nonsense word by selecting the numbered response button (i.e. 1, 2, or 3) that corresponds to the position oof the nonsense word in the phrase. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off. . The score is the percent correct, a higher score is better.
Rapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.Initial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (day 14 of study)A word learning task used to determine participant's ability to associate novel/nonsense words with novel images as rapidly as possible. Five nonsense words are paired with five novel images displayed on response buttons. The words are presented randomly 10 times each. The participant selects one picture per word. Scores are presented as percent correct. A higher percentage indicates better word learning. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off.
Subjective Preference for the Adaptive Situational Gain Feature With Each Fitting Formula2nd appointment (day 14 of study)Participants will rank preference for the ASG feature (either on or off) in each fitting (NAL and DSL) after listening to audio file.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
One group will be fit with commercially available hearing aids that will have different program settings Phonak Audeo hearing aid: receiver in the canal devices with non-custom earmolds
16
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental
Age, Continuous13.7 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Multi-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL

Out of a list of seven words, the participant repeats back as many words as they can recall. Percentage of correct words repeated back is calculated. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. One fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off. A higher percentage score indicates better multi-word recognition.

Time frame: Initial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (Day 14 of study)

Population: Participants who were fit with study hearing aids and completed at least one two-hour test session.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 40 dB for NAL fitting, ASG Off48 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 20
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 40 dB for NAL fitting, ASG On56 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 16
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 40 dB for DSL fitting, ASG Off51 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 16
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 40 dB for DSL fitting, ASG On54 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 16
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG Off66 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 17
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG On67 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 13
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 70 dB, DSL fitting, ASG Off63 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 13
ExperimentalMulti-word Recognition at 40 dB SPL and 70 dB SPL% correct at 70 dB, DSL fitting, ASG On67 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 13
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: Presentation level will have no effect on multi-word recognition scores.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: The ASG setting will have no effect on multi-word recognition scores.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: Hearing aid prescription will have no effect on multi-word recognition scores.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Nonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.

A list of 10 3-word phrases are presented to the participant. The participant indicates if the phrase contains a nonsense word by selecting the numbered response button (i.e. 1, 2, or 3) that corresponds to the position oof the nonsense word in the phrase. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off. . The score is the percent correct, a higher score is better.

Time frame: Initial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (day 14 of study)

Population: Participants who were fit with study hearing aids and completed at least one two-hour test session.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, DSL fitting, ASG On87 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 7
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, NAL fitting formula, ASG Off65 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 15
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, NAL fitting with ASG On68 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 13
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, DSL fitting, ASG Off73 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 18
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, DSL fitting, ASG On71 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 12
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG Off89 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 7
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG On87 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 7
ExperimentalNonword Detection Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, DSL fitting, ASG Off88 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 9
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: Presentation level will have no effect on Nonword Detection scores.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: Hearing aid prescription will have no effect on Nonword Detection scores.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: The ASG setting will have no effect on Nonword Detection scores.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Rapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.

A word learning task used to determine participant's ability to associate novel/nonsense words with novel images as rapidly as possible. Five nonsense words are paired with five novel images displayed on response buttons. The words are presented randomly 10 times each. The participant selects one picture per word. Scores are presented as percent correct. A higher percentage indicates better word learning. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off.

Time frame: Initial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (day 14 of study)

Population: Participants who were fit with study hearing aids and completed at least one two-hour test session.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, NAL fitting, ASG Off68 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 23
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, NAL fitting, ASG On76 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 18
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, DSL fitting, ASG Off70 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 22
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, DSL fitting, ASG On73 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 20
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG Off69 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 18
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG On73 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 16
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, DSL fitting, ASG Off67 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 20
ExperimentalRapid Word Learning With Stimuli Presented at 40 dB SPL and at 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, DSL fitting, ASG On70 percentage of correct responsesStandard Deviation 21
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: The ASG setting will have no effect on Rapid Word Learning scores.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: Presentation level will have no effect on Rapid Word Learning scores.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null hypothesis: Hearing aid prescripton will have no effect on Rapid Word Learning scores.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Speech Reception Threshold

A familiar spondee word list is presented at varying dB (decibel) levels. Threshold is defined as the lowest dB level at which a correct response occurs for two out of three ascending trials. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session, and counterbalanced across participants. Each session consisted of testing with the ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) feature on and off. The lower the number (dB level), the softer the participant is able to repeat the words correctly two out of three times.

Time frame: Initial appointment (day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (Day 14 of study)

Population: Participants who were fit with study hearing aids and completed at least one two-hour test session.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalSpeech Reception ThresholdNAL Fitting with ASG Off27 dB HL (decibels hearing level)Standard Deviation 8
ExperimentalSpeech Reception ThresholdNAL Fitting with ASG ON27 dB HL (decibels hearing level)Standard Deviation 7
ExperimentalSpeech Reception ThresholdDSL Fitting with ASG Off24 dB HL (decibels hearing level)Standard Deviation 8
ExperimentalSpeech Reception ThresholdDSL Fitting with ASG On24 dB HL (decibels hearing level)Standard Deviation 6
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (NAL/National Acoustic Laboratory or DSL/Desired Sensation Level) and ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor.~Null hypothesis: The hearing aid fitting prescription will have no effect on the speech reception thresholds.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (NAL/National Acoustic Laboratory or DSL/Desired Sensation Level) and ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor.~Null hypothesis: The ASG setting will have no effect on the speech reception threshold.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Subjective Preference for the Adaptive Situational Gain Feature With Each Fitting Formula

Participants will rank preference for the ASG feature (either on or off) in each fitting (NAL and DSL) after listening to audio file.

Time frame: 2nd appointment (day 14 of study)

Population: Participants who were fit with study hearing aids and completed both two-hour test sessions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ExperimentalSubjective Preference for the Adaptive Situational Gain Feature With Each Fitting FormulaNumber of participants preferring ASG Off with NAL fitting2 Participants
ExperimentalSubjective Preference for the Adaptive Situational Gain Feature With Each Fitting FormulaNumber of participants preferring ASG On with NAL fitting2 Participants
ExperimentalSubjective Preference for the Adaptive Situational Gain Feature With Each Fitting FormulaNumber of participants preferring ASG Off with DSL fitting7 Participants
ExperimentalSubjective Preference for the Adaptive Situational Gain Feature With Each Fitting FormulaNumber of participants preferring ASG On with DSL fitting3 Participants
Primary

Word Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.

Familiar monosyllabic word list presented at 40 dB and 70 dB. Percentage of words correctly repeated is calculated. Testing was completed in two, two-hour test sessions occurring two weeks apart. A different fitting prescription, NAL (National Acoustic Laboratory) or DSL (Desired Sensation Level) was selected for each test session and counterbalanced across participants such that one test session consisted of testing with one prescription, either NAL or DSL, but with both levels (40 and 70 dB) and with both ASG (Adaptive Situational Gain) settings, on and off. The higher the score, the better the word recognition in each condition.

Time frame: Initial appointment (Day 1 of study) and 2nd appointment (day 14 of study)

Population: Participants who were fit with study hearing aids and completed at least one two-hour test session.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, NAL fitting, ASG Off52 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 24
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, NAL fitting, ASG On63 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 26
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, DSL fitting, ASG Off69 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 21
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct at 40 dB, DSL fitting, ASG On75 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 22
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG Off92 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 10
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, NAL fitting, ASG On95 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 5
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct at 70 dB, DSL fitting, ASG Off95 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 6
ExperimentalWord Recognition Score With Words Presented at 40 dB SPL (Decibel Sound Pressure Level) and 70 dB SPL.% correct, DSL fitting, ASG On96 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 7
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null Hypothesis: The ASG setting will have no effect on the Word Recognition Scores.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null Hypothesis: The presentation level will have no effect on the Word Recognition Scores.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A Linear Mixed Model Analysis was performed. The hearing aid prescription (DSL, NAL) and ASG setting (on, off) were entered as fixed factors while the individual participants were entered as a random factor. An additional fixed factor of presentation level (40, 70 dB SPL) was added to the analyses.~Null Hypothesis: Hearing aid prescription will have no effect on the Word Recognition Scores.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026