Study Comparing Classic Vaginal Hysterectomy to vNOTES Hysterectomy

Retrospective Study Comparing Classic Vaginal Hysterectomy to vNOTES Hysterectomy

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05150275

Acronym

H-vNOTES

Enrollment

200

Registered

2021-12-09

Start date

2021-12-31

Completion date

2022-12-31

Last updated

2021-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hysterotomy

Keywords

Hysterotomy, vNOTES, Laparoscopy, Vaginal route

Brief summary

vNOTES is a new surgical approach that has been used for less than 10 years. Several studies compare it to laparoscopy but none compare it to the classic vaginal route. The aim of the research is to analyze postoperative pain

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Adult woman (≥18 years old) * Woman having undergone a vaginal hysterectomy and by vNOTES at Strasbourg University Hospitals between 01/01/2017 and 05/31/2021 * Woman who did not express her opposition to the reuse of her data for the purposes of this research.

Exclusion criteria

* Woman who expressed her opposition to participating in the study * Surgical procedure associated with hysterectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Analysis of postoperative pain in patients who have had a vaginal hysterectomy	Files analysed retrospectively from January 01, 2017 to May 31, 2021 will be examined]

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactOlivier GARBIN, MD

olivier.garbin@chru-strasbourg.fr33 3 69 55 34 04

Backup ContactSaïd CHAYER, PhD, HDR

said.chayer@chru-strasbourg.fr

Outcome results