Skip to content

Active Surveillance vs in Office Fulguration for Low Grade Bladder Cancer Tumors

Prospective Randomized Trial in Low Grade Bladder Tumors: Active Surveillance vs Endoscopic Fulguration.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05148728
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-12-08
Start date
2021-12-15
Completion date
2024-03-15
Last updated
2021-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer

Keywords

active surveillance, fulguration, bladder cancer

Brief summary

Biological behabiour of low grade bladder cancer tumors is well known. They have a very high rate of recurrences during their follow up but very low (less than 1%) risk of progression. Until now, the gold standard of any bladder recurrence for this patients is performing an immediate transurethral ressection of the tumor. This surgery has risk of complications and, due to the low risk of these subgroup of tumors, sometimes it becomes an overtreatment for the patients. This is the reason why new conservative or less invasive surgeries are proposed to follow up and treat these patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic fulguration

already included. WE will use Storz monopolar device for fulguration

Sponsors

Vall Hebron Insitut Recerca
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recurrent Ta-T1a (above muscularis mucosa) LOW GRADE bladder tumor * Accept cystoscopy surveillance * Main lession less than 10mm * Less than 7 lesions * Negative or low grade cytology * No solid aspect

Exclusion criteria

* previous High grade bladder cancer tumors * previous Cis * previous Upper Urinary Tract tumor * previous pelvic radiotherapy * hematuria * meatal localisation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression ratetwo yearsNumber of patients that progress during the follow up
Complications ratetwo yearsNumber and grade of complications in both arms. Clavien Dindo Scale will be used

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recurrence ratetwo yearsnumber of recurrences
quality of life measured with CAVICAVENMI questionnairetwo yearsquality of life of the patients in both subgroups. CAVICAVENMI questionnaire will be used

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026